Conidiocarpus Woron.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10011275 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9-F259-FFE5-FF30-FEF8EE63FDEB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Conidiocarpus Woron. |
status |
|
Conidiocarpus Woron. View in CoL View at ENA
Conidiocarpus View in CoL View at ENA was initially identified as the asexual form of Phragmocapnias ( Hughes 1976) View in CoL and considered as a synonym for Phragmocapnias View in CoL ( Chomnunti et al. 2011, 2014, Hongsanan et al. 2015). Bose et al. (2014) followed Hughes (1976) and transferred Phragmocapnias species View in CoL to Conidiocarpus View in CoL View at ENA following the rules of nomenclatural priority. However, Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020) recognized them as separate genera based on morphology and phylogeny. There are 14 epithets listed in Index Fungorum (2023) for Conidiocarpus View in CoL View at ENA . However, sequence data is available for only four species: Co. asiaticus , Co. caucasicus View in CoL , Co. plumeriae View in CoL , and Co. siamensis . Moreover, Co. philippinensis View in CoL is classified as a member of Chaetocapnodium View in CoL , and Co. betle View in CoL is placed within Phragmocapnias ( Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020) View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Conidiocarpus Woron.
Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S. & Hongsanan, Sinang 2023 |
Chaetocapnodium
Hongsanan & K.D.Hyde 2015 |