Frontipodopsis cf. reticulatifrons Szalay, 1945
Pešić, Vladimir, Smit, Harry & Saboori, Alireza, 2012, 3330, Zootaxa 3330, pp. 1-67 : 59
publication ID |
11755334 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A6418788-BC58-7068-D098-FEFFFBBADF5D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Frontipodopsis cf. reticulatifrons Szalay, 1945 |
status |
|
Frontipodopsis cf. reticulatifrons Szalay, 1945
( Figs. 46A – E)
Material examined. Iran, Hormozgan Province, IR22-2011, Rudan city N of Bandar Abbass, 5 km N of Rudan, Rudan stream, interstitial dig, 27º 28.748 N, 57º 15.648 E, 210 m asl, 21.vii.2011 1/0/0 (mounted); same data as holotype, surface water, 0/0/1 (mounted) GoogleMaps .
Morphology. Male — Idiosoma ( Fig. 46A) L/H 491/256 (ratio 1.92). Genital field fused with the secondary sclerotization at posterior ventral shield margin. Three pairs of Ac, distance between outer margins of Ac-1 and Ac- 3, 63. Ejaculatory complex ( Fig. 46C) L 86. Palp ( Fig. 46B): total L 178, dL: P-1, 20; P-2, 51; P-3, 29; P-4, 52; P- 5, 26; L P-2/P-4 ratio 0.98; palp morphology as illustrated in Fig. 46B. Legs: dL of I-L-4-6 ( Fig. 43D): 43, 59, 75; segments of IV-L expanded and flattened ( Fig. 46E); dL of IV-L: 109, 38, 84, 88, 95, 75.
Remarks. In having the idiosoma proportionally longer and lower (L/H ratio> 1.5), and the proportionally shorter segments of the fourth leg, especially IV-L-5 and -6 (proportionally longer in Indian subspecies F. reticulatifrons indicus , see Cook 1967), the specimen reported here is most similar to the European subspecies F. reticulatifrons reticulatifrons , but differs from typical specimens in the IV-L segments being more expanded and flattened.
A further subspecies, F. reticulatifrons persicus Schwoerbel & Serpasgozarian, 1980 , decribed from a single female from northern Iran (Mazandaran Province), is similar in having more expanded segments of the fourth leg (especially IV-L-4-6), but differs in having the idiosoma proportionally much higher (idiosoma L/H ratio 1.4, data taken from Schwoerbel & Sepasgosarian 1980).
Information about the variability of diagnostic characters of these subspecies is lacking. For this reason, we are convinced that it is best to postpone a decision on the taxonomic state of this specimen, probably a representative of an undescribed (sub) species, until the variability in additional specimens is known.
Habitat. Interstitial waters associated with sand and gravel deposits of stream.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |