Dima assoi Pérez Arcas, 1872
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4412.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22C58CA7-7D33-4D75-BB10-D52A37379902 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5985453 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A648DA77-9149-9B33-FF51-17CDFA42DA77 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Dima assoi Pérez Arcas, 1872 |
| status |
|
Dima assoi Pérez Αrcas, 1872: 131. Celox assoi: Schimmel (1996a): 139 .
Type depository. Syntype, sex undetermined (MNCN).
Type locality. Spain: Moncayo.
Distribution. Spain.
Literature. Pérez Arcas (1872): original description; Marseul (1886): note; Candèze (1891a): catalogue; Heyden et al. (1891): catalogue; Schwarz (1906): catalogue; Fleutiaux (1916): comparison with other species; Schenkling (1927): catalogue; Fuente (1929): catalogue; Cobos (1961): review; Sánchez-Ruiz (1996): catalogue; Schimmel (1996a): catalogue; Cate (2007): catalogue; Schimmel & Platia (2008): review; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz (2012, 2013, 2014): catalogue; Löbl & Smetana (2013): taxonomic note; Gilgado et al. (2015): ecology, distribution.
Remark. This species was placed as a synonym under Dima dima (Schaufuss, 1862) by some authors (e.g., Candèze 1891a, Schimmel 1996a, Cate 2007), however both species are currently treated as valid ( Cobos 1961; Sánchez-Ruiz 1996; Schimmel & Platia 2008; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz 2012, 2013, 2014; Löbl & Smetana 2 013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |