Omalus timidus ( Nurse, 1902 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1290857D-36E6-47DE-81C7-70CBD7C0AE01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4544726 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96A8877-B428-FFB8-64CD-F52DFDD38921 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Omalus timidus ( Nurse, 1902 ) |
status |
|
( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 A–15F)
Ellampus timidus Nurse, 1902: 305 . Lectotype ♂ designated by Kimsey 1986: 107; Pakistan: Peshin (NHMUK). Bingham 1908: 347 (Assam).
Omalus (Philoctetes) timidus: Jonathan et al. 1977: 85 ( India: Delhi).
Omalus timidus: Rosa et al. 2015c: 68 View Cited Treatment (key), 73 (descr.), 74 (diagn., fig. 4).
Distribution. India (Assam; Delhi). Palaearctic: Pakistan ( Rosa et al. 2015c). Oriental: China (Guandong) ( Rosa et al. 2014).
Remarks. Kimsey & Bohart (1991) transferred Ellampus timidus in the genus Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 . Rosa et al. (2015c) transferred this species in the genus Omalus Panzer, 1801 . du Buysson (in Nurse 1904) synonymised Omalus timidus with Pseudomalus hypocrita ( du Buysson, 1893) . However, based on type specimens, these two species belong to separate genera.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Omalus timidus ( Nurse, 1902 )
Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan 2021 |
Omalus (Philoctetes) timidus:
Jonathan, J. K. & Roy, S. B. & Dhar, M. 1977: 85 |
Ellampus timidus
Kimsey, L. S. 1986: 107 |
Bingham, C. T. 1908: 347 |
Nurse, G. C. 1902: 305 |