Cakile maritima var. integrifolia Boiss., Fl.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7630433 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7631096 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC0E341D-FF24-83D4-FF4C-5D24FC77FE76 |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Cakile maritima var. integrifolia Boiss., Fl. |
| status |
|
Cakile maritima var. integrifolia Boiss., Fl. Orient. 1: 365. 1867.
Type: “Hab. in Aegypto ad Alexandriam (Samar!), in Euxino ad Moeotidem (Stev!)”.
Lectotypus (designated here): EGYPT: “Inter Alexandriam et Ramole”, 26.VIII.1855, Samaritani 3054 ( G-BOIS [ G00332568 ]) . Syntypus: TURKEY: “Taur. Littor.”, 1820, Steven s.n. ( G-DC [ G00202895 ]) .
= Cakile maritima Scop., Fl. Carniol. View in CoL ed. 2, 2: 35. 1772.
Notes. – RODMAN (1974) did not examine the two syntypes above and did not lectotypify the taxon.
The only specimen of this species in the G herbaria that was collected by Steven is the one listed above. Its locality is different from that in the protologue, and it is not known if there is another specimen that has been misplaced or there is some error in the original listing of the locality. Therefore the problem of this syntype remains unresolved.
The G-BOIS specimen is more complete and designated as the lectotype .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Cakile maritima var. integrifolia Boiss., Fl.
| AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle 2019 |
Cakile maritima var. integrifolia
| Boiss., Fl. 1867: 365 |