Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7630433 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7630660 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC0E341D-FF91-8361-FFB5-5976FB4FFD66 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl. |
status |
|
Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl. View in CoL Orient. 1: 71. 1843.
Type: “[Boissier] Hab. in regione alpinâ montium Lydiae et Cariae ad umbram Juniperorum, Mesogis, Cadmus, Tmolus. Floret Junio ”.
Lectotypus (first step designated by POLATSCHEK, 2011: 401; second step designated here): TURKEY: “In dumosis Cadmi ad orientum Denislah”, VI.1842, Boissier s.n. ( G-BOIS [ G00332155 ]; isolecto-: C [ C10008844 ], GH [ GH00055746 ], GOET [ GOET002595 View Materials ], K [ K000075607 , K000075608 ], NY [ NY00689139 , NY00689140 ]) . Syntypi: TURKEY: “Tmolus supra Bozdagh ad rivus Lydia”, VII.1842, Boissier s.n. ( G-BOIS [ G00332157 ]) ; “Tmolus”, s.d., Boissier s.n. ( G-BOIS [ G00332153 ]) ; “Caria”, 1843, Pinard s.n. ( W [ W0026657 ]) .
= Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. View in CoL Nov.: 10. 1842.
Notes. – POLATSCHEK (2011) erroneously lectotypified the name on the unicate W0026657, which was not annotated by Boissier, and attributed its collection to Boissier instead of Pinard. The duplicates in C, GH, GOET, and NY that he cited were Boissier’s collections listed above as isolectotypes.
BOISSIER (1843) based his species description almost exclusively on his own collections in G-BOIS that Polatschek did not examine or cite. Therefore, a second step is necessary to designate the lectotype in G-BOIS.
The lectotype has only the month and not the year, but all the isolectotypes have “Tmolus et Cadmus . VI. 1842 ” indicated.
Erysimum pulchellum var. microphyllum Boiss., Fl. View in CoL Orient. 1: 207. 1867.
Cheiranthus rupestris Sm. View in CoL in Sibth., Fl. Graec. Prodr. 2: 23. 1813.
= Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. View in CoL Nov.: 10. 1842.
Note. – This is a renaming at the varietal rank of Cheiranthus rupestris View in CoL (holotype: Sibthorp s.n., probably at OXF).
Erysimum pulchellum var. calvertii (Boiss. & A. Huet) Boiss., Fl. View in CoL Orient. 1: 207. 1867.
Erysimum rupestre var. calvertii Boiss. & A. Huet View in CoL in Boiss., Diagn. Pl. Orient. ser. 2, 5: 22. 1856.
Type: “Hab. in Armeniâ propè Messiré in valle Kassuklu cl. Huet, in monte Techdagh cl. Calvert”.
Lectotypus (designated here): TURKEY: “Tech Dagh”, 1853, Calvert 38 ( G-BOIS [ G00332160 ]) . Syntypi: TURKEY: “In valle Kassuklu. Inter Baibout et Erzeroum”, V.1853, Huet du Pavilion s.n. ( G [ G00446068 ], K [ K000075603 , K000075605 ], W [ W18890010515 ]) ; “Ad viam propè Messiré. Inter Trapezuntem et Baibout”, V.1853, Huet du Pavilion s.n. ( GOET, K [ K000075602 , K000075606 ], W) .
= Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. View in CoL Nov.: 10. 1842.
Note. – POLATSCHEK (2011) did not typify the variety, though he cited the syntypes under E. pulchellum View in CoL .
C |
University of Copenhagen |
GH |
Harvard University - Gray Herbarium |
GOET |
Universität Göttingen |
K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
NY |
William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden |
W |
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien |
G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl.
AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle 2019 |
Erysimum pulchellum var. microphyllum
Boiss., Fl. 1867: 207 |
Erysimum pulchellum var. calvertii
Boiss. & A. Huet 1867: 207 |
Erysimum rupestre var. calvertii
Boiss. & A. Huet 1856: 22 |
Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.)
J. Gay 1842: 10 |
Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.)
J. Gay 1842: 10 |
Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.)
J. Gay 1842: 10 |