Hesperis kotschyi Boiss., Diagn. Pl.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7630433 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5729586 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC0E341D-FFF8-830B-FCFC-5E24FD7AFE16 |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Hesperis kotschyi Boiss., Diagn. Pl. |
| status |
|
Hesperis kotschyi Boiss., Diagn. Pl. View in CoL View at ENA Orient. ser. 2, 5: 21. 1856.
Type: “Hab. in praeruptis calcareis ad latus orientale montis Gisyl tepe Tauri Cilicici cl. Kotschy”.
Holotypus: TURKEY: “Iter Cilicicum in Tauri alpes ‘Bulgar Dagh.’ Loca praerupta in devexis orientalibus calcariis montis Gisyl Deppe”, 20.VII.1853, Kotschy 236g ( G-BOIS [ G00332211 ]; iso-: GOET [ GOET002616 View Materials ], KW [ KW000127978 ], P [ P00234974 , P02272569 ], W [ W0075692 ], WAG [ WAG0004247 About WAG ]) .
Notes. – It is certain that BOISSIER (1856) drafted the species description on the unicate in his herbarium alone and, therefore, it is safe to treat that unicate as the holotype.
Furthermore, he did not cite a collection number in that publication, though Boissier in Flora Orientalis listed Kotschy 256, an obvious typographical error for 236g, when he synonymized H. kotschyi under the later-published H. humilis (see below).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Hesperis kotschyi Boiss., Diagn. Pl.
| AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle 2019 |
Hesperis kotschyi
| Boiss., Diagn. Pl. 1856: 21 |