Thorius munificus, Hanken & Wake, 1998
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13259133 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC57066A-FFDC-C678-F5E5-75FCFDA1F8FB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thorius munificus |
status |
|
Thorius munificus View in CoL ** (SMO)
Thorius spilogaster ** (TVB) Notophthalmus meridionalis (GCL, SMO) Gerrhonotus ophiurus* (SMO, TVB) Ophisaurus incomptus* (TVB) Laemanctus longipes (GCL, TVB) Norops alvarezdeltoroi* (GCL)
Sceloporus cyanogenys (SMO) Plestiodon tetragrammus (SMO) Gonatodes albogularis (GCL) Lepidophyma sylvaticum* (GCL, SMO) Lepidophyma zongolica* (SMO, TVB) Xenosaurus rectocollaris* (SMO) Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus* (SMO) Conopsis acuta* (GCL)
Ficimia streckeri (GCL, SMO) Lampropeltis triangulum (GCL) Leptophis ahaetulla (GCL) Masticophis flagellum (GCL) Masticophis schotti (GCL, SMO) Pantherophis emoryi (GCL, SMO) Pituophis lineaticollis (SMO, TVB) Salvadora grahamiae (SMO, TVB) Stenorrhina freminvillii (TVB)
Diadophis punctatus (SMO, TVB)
Geophis chalybeus ** (SMO)
Rhadinaea cuneata* (GCL, SMO, TVB)
Rhadinaea quinquelineata* (SMO)
Nerodia rhombifer (GCL, SMO, TVB)
Storeria storerioides* (SMO, TVB)
Thamnophis marcianus (SMO, TVB)
Thamnophis pulchrilatus* (SMO)
Agkistrodon taylori* (GCL, SMO)
Cerrophidion petlalcalensis* (SMO, TVB)
Crotalus totonacus* (SMO, TVB)
Forty-nine of these 93 species (52.7%) are country endemics, 13 (14.0%) are state endemics, and 31 (33.3%) are non-endemics. Thus, 62 species (66.7%) are endemic, but are not represented within the protected areas of the state.
Additional surveys are necessary to determine which of these 93 species might be located in one or more of the existing protected areas, and which would require protection in newly-established areas. The numbers of these species recorded in the four physiographic regions of the state are as follows: GCL (35), SLT (0), SMO (57), and TVB (38). Interestingly, the largest proportion of these 93 species that are not represented in existing protected areas is in the SMO (61.3%), a region that currently does not contain any designated protected areas. This fact provides an additional reason why protected areas should be established in the limited portion of the state occupied by elements of the SMO.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.