Psyttalia incisi (Silvestri, 1916)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.629.10167 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FED331ED-C3CF-493A-861B-29F6FB8CDAB5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ACF041B1-CB9E-C121-36D0-99291E136950 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Psyttalia incisi (Silvestri, 1916) |
status |
|
Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Braconidae
Psyttalia incisi (Silvestri, 1916) View in CoL Figs 28-32
Opius incisi Silvestri, 1916: 164-165; Beardsley 1961: 357; Wharton and Gilstrap 1983: 738; Ji et al. 2004: 144-145.
Psyttalia incisi : Wharton 1997: 23, 2009: 353.
Material.
4 ♀ 4 ♂ (RMNH, ZJUH), "S. China: Fujian, Fuzhou, reared in lab for release, 6.vi.2012, C. v. Achterberg, RMNH’ 12, Psyttalia incisi (Silvestri)". The released reared specimens originate from locally collected stock ( Ji et al. 2004).
Comparative diagnosis.
Psyttalia incisi shares with the very similar Psyttalia makii and Psyttalia fletcheri the long vein r of fore wing (Fig. 28) and the short temple (Fig. 32). Psyttalia incisi can be separated by having vein 2-SR+M of fore wing 3.5-4.0 times as long as wide (Fig. 28; vs about twice as long as wide in Psyttalia makii and Psyttalia fletcheri ) and vein m-cu of fore wing weakly curved or straight (vs strongly curved in Psyttalia makii and Psyttalia fletcheri ).
Distribution.
China (Fujian), India, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines (Luzon). Introduced in U.S.A. (Hawaii, Florida), Mexico, Fiji, Guam and Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia) ( Yu et al. 2012).
Biology.
Parasitoid of Tephritidae : Carpomyia vesuvuana Costa, Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi), Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet), Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera incisa (Walker), Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel), Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera tuberculata (Bezzi), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and Dacus ciliatus Loew.
Notes.
The series reared in the lab has either the basal half of pterostigma entirely dark brown and similar to its apical half (Fig. 28; males) or its basal half is yellow and contrasting with its dark brown apical half (females). The latter is considered to be typical ( Wharton and Gilstrap 1983) but can be used only for females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |