Strobliellini
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4250.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FCB5489C-4358-45D6-9A11-D7DBC8260569 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6010542 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD14BB2D-9D12-1C42-32DD-1818FCB1F954 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Strobliellini |
status |
|
Tribe Strobliellini View in CoL Kieffer
Edwards (1938) was first to shed light on this enigmatic tribe, which at that time contained a single species, Strobliella intermedia Kieffer. Most important for subsequent students of Strobliellini , Edwards (1938: fig. 7) studied and figured the holotype male of S. intermedia , which now seems to be lost ( Jaschhof 1999). Another stroblielline genus, Groveriella , was introduced by Mamaev (1978), again for a single species, G. carpathica , known from a single male. A second species of Groveriella , G. baltica , was described by Spungis and Jaschhof (2000). These three species, of which G. baltica and S. intermedia are treated in more detail below, are apparently the only true Strobliellini . Both Amedia floridana Jaschhof and Amediella involuta Jaschhof should be regarded as provisionally classified in this tribe (see Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2009: 86); Eleniella kyseluci Berest was recently recognized as being identical with Monardia obsoleta Edwards , a species of Micromyini ( Jaschhof 2016) ; and Strobliella brachycornis Spungis & Jaschhof is a species of the genus Catocha , tribe Catochini , as shown above.
Morphological traits of adults (larvae are unknown) indicate that the phylogenetic position of Strobliellini is between Catochini and Campylomyzini ( Edwards 1938; Jaschhof 1998; Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2009: fig. 104). The fact that specimens of Strobliellini are rare items in museum collections complicates their analysis, which is demonstrated below using the example of Strobliella intermedia . The tribe is defined by the wing venation, which includes an unbranched M1+2 and a basally free M4 ( Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2009: fig. 15D), and by the augmented number of flagellomeres, which in both sexes is more than 14.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.