Macrobiotus alekseevi, Tumanov, Denis V., 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.171402 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5619013 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE0CF010-1A11-FFF3-FEC6-FB41FDD1167C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macrobiotus alekseevi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Macrobiotus alekseevi View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs. 1–21 View FIGURES 1 – 7 View FIGURES 8 – 16 View FIGURES 17 – 23 , Table 1 View TABLE 1 )
Type Material: Holotype: Sex indet., slide number 201(2). Collected by Dr. V. R. Alekseev (Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St.Petersburg) 0 1.02.2003, Thailand. Paratypes, slide’s numbers 201(1, 3–7, 10, 12–14, 17–20, 22–25) from the same locality. Holotype and paratypes are preserved at the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. One paratype (slide number 201(27)) preserved in the collection of Binda and Pilato (Department of Animal Biology, University of Catania, Italy).
Type locality. Thailand, NamNao National Park (Phetchabun province and Chaiyaphum province), near the park's headquarters, fallen bamboo leaves in a pit near a little stream. Ninetyeight adult and juveniles (8 in simplex stage) and 39 eggs (8 with developed embryos) were found.
Etymology. This species is dedicated to Dr. V. R. Alekseev, who kindly collected the material for me in Thailand.
Description. Body length of adult animals 365.8–551.9 m ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Body normally white, only specimens in the simplex stage are pinkish. Without eye spots. Cuticle smooth without pores, with fine granulation on hind legs. Buccopharyngeal apparatus of Macrobiotus type ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 8 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) (for all dimensions see Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). Buccal cavity with ten peribuccal lamellae, wide anterior band of fine teeth, a posterior crown of triangular teeth and a system of three dorsal and three ventral transverse ridges; lateroventral ridges usually with denticulate anterior margin, medioventral ridge always subdivided into 3–5 triangular or rounded teeth ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 9, 10 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ). Buccal tube wide with typical strengthening bar. Pharyngeal bulb with apophyses, three macroplacoids and a small microplacoid well separated from the third macroplacoid. A thin cuticular connection between the third macroplacoid and the microplacoid is present. Third macroplacoid with a distinct preterminal constriction. Claws of hufelandi type ( Figs. 5, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 11, 12 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) with minute stalk, poorly marked distal part of the basal portion and long common tract. Primary and secondary branches diverge above half of claw height, main branches with well developed accessory points. Claws of fourth pair of legs longer than claws of first three pairs of legs. All claws with lunules, which are slightly larger and provided with small teeth on the fourth pair of legs. Two small and indistinct cuticular thickenings are present below claw bases of first three pairs of legs. In the largest specimens hind legs with zone of thickened cuticle near their bases ( Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 21 View FIGURES 17 – 23 ).
Character Holotype Smallest Largest Mean (Range) Standard
specimen specimen error
body length (m) 538.7 365.8 552.0 452.3 (365.8–552.0) 11.83 Ss = distance from cephalic end of buccal tube to insertion point of stylet supports.
Supplementary measurements for holotype: length of strengthening bar on buccal tube: above 31.1 m, lunulae on claws of the fourth pair of legs: 2.2 x 6.7 m
Eggs spherical, white, ornamented and laid freely ( Figs. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 13–16 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ). Chorion with truncoconical processes and areolated surface. Chorion processes with caplike vesicular structures on their apices and transverse annulation in their apical parts. Surface of processes with dense reticulation, the meshes are isodiametric near the process base and become longitudinally elongated in the central part of the process. Meshes with slightly sinuous margins. Ten–twelve areolae surround the base of each process. Ridges delimiting the areolae with indistinct reticulation, better developed near the process bases. Areolae with poorly developed reticulate sculpture. Proportions of the chorion processes are very variable, along with the typically looking eggs two kinds of abnormal eggs were found – with extremely shortened (2 eggs) and strongly elongated (3 eggs) processes ( Figs. 17– 20 View FIGURES 17 – 23 ). Ridges delimiting the areolae on the egg surface are also very variable in width. Diameter of eggs (without processes): 59.2–82.8 m; height of processes (10–12 in the optical section): 11.8–21.8 m, their basal diameter: 13.3–22.9 m (including abnormal eggs).
Remarks. Macrobiotus alekseevi sp. nov. belongs to the richtersi group. It differs from all species of this group by having egg processes with vesicular caplike structures. It also differs from other species of this group in following features:
From Macrobiotus corgatensis Pilato, Binda & Lisi, 2002 View in CoL in absence of eyes, longer (related to the buccal tube length) claws of the hind legs (pt value 28.0– 34.3 in M. alekseevi View in CoL and 25.7 in M. corgatensis View in CoL holotype), smaller eggs, shorter egg processes, less sculptured areolae, less developed reticulation on ridges, delimiting the areolae ( Pilato et al. 2002).
From Macrobiotus danielae Pilato, Binda, Napolitano & Moncada, 2001 View in CoL in absence of eyes, egg processes with smaller basal diameter, with transverse annulation on the process apices, sculptured areolae (Pilato et al. 2001).
From Macrobiotus gerlachae Pilato, Binda & Lisi, 2004 in egg processes of different shape with transverse annulation ( Pilato et al. 2004b).
From Macrobiotus lorenae Biserov, 1996 View in CoL in shorter egg processes of different shape and sculptured areolae ( Biserov 1996).
From Macrobiotus peteri Pilato, Claxton & Binda, 1989 View in CoL in longer (related to the buccal tube length) claws of the hind legs (pt value 28.0– 34.3 in M. alekseevi View in CoL and 23.0–26.0 in M. peteri View in CoL ), larger egg processes of different shape, sculptured areolae ( Pilato et al. 1989a).
From Macrobiotus . priviterae Binda, Pilato, Moncada & Napolitano, 2001 in absent eyes, relatively thinner buccal tube, smaller eggs, egg processes of different shape, lesser density of the egg processes reticulation, more numerous and less sculptured areolae (Binda et al. 2001).
From Macrobiotus View in CoL . richtersi Murray, 1911 View in CoL in egg processes of different shape with subapical annulation and sculptured areolae.
From Macrobiotus savai Binda & Pilato, 2001 View in CoL in absence of eyes, slightly longer (related to the buccal tube length) claws of the hind legs (pt value 28.0– 34.3 in M. alekseevi View in CoL and 24.7–27.9 in M. savai View in CoL ), different reticulation pattern of egg processes, presence of subapical annulation on processes, sculptured areolae (Binda & Pilato 2001).
From Macrobiotus vanescens Pilato, Binda & Catanzaro, 1991 View in CoL in stylet supports inserted on the buccal tube in a more caudal position (pt values: 78.1–81.0 in M. alekseevi View in CoL and 77.3–79.4 in M. vanescens View in CoL ), smaller eggs with lesser basal diameter of processes ( Pilato et al. 1991, 2001).
buccal tube length (m) | 53.3 | 41.4 | 54.8 | 47.1 (39.2–55.5) | 0.90 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ss (m) | 42.2 | 32.6 | 43.7 | 37.3 (31.1–44) | 0.71 |
pt Ss (%) | 79.2 | 78.6 | 79.7 | 79.3 (78.1–81) | 0.13 |
outer buccal tube width (m) | 10.4 | 6.9 | 11.1 | 8.4 (6.3–11.5) | 0.28 |
pt of outer buccal tube width (%) | 19.4 | 16.6 | 20.3 | 17.9 (15–20.7) | 0.31 |
Placoid row length (m) | 38.5 | 26.6 | 42.9 | 30.9 (22.9–42.9) | 0.94 |
pt of placoid row length (%) Macroplacoid row length (m) | 72.2 30.3 | 64.3 20.4 | 78.4 33.3 | 65.3 (58.5–78.4) 24.1 (18.5–33.3) | 0.87 0.72 |
pt of macroplacoid row length (%) | 56.9 | 49.1 | 60.8 | 51.1 (45.5–60.8) | 0.68 |
1st macroplacoid length (m) | 8.9 | 6.3 | 11.1 | 7.5 (5.2–11.1) | 0.23 |
pt of 1st macroplacoid length (%) | 16.7 | 15.2 | 20.3 | 16 (13.2–20.3) | 0.26 |
2nd macroplacoid length (m) | 6.7 | 4.4 | 7.0 | 5.5 (3.9–7.4) | 0.19 |
pt of 2nd macroplacoid length (%) | 12.5 | 10.7 | 12.8 | 11.7 (9.8–14.5) | 0.24 |
3rd macroplacoid length (m) | 10.4 | 7.4 | 11.1 | 8.2 (5.9–11.1) | 0.26 |
pt of 3rd macroplacoid length (%) | 19.4 | 17.9 | 20.3 | 17.4 (14.9–20.3) | 0.30 |
Microplacoid length (m) | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 (1.9–3) | 0.06 |
pt of microplacoid length (%) | 4.2 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 4.8 (4–6.2) | 0.11 |
External claw height, leg I (m) | 13.3 | 9.6 | 13.3 | 11.7 (9.6–13.7) | 0.22 |
pt of external claw height, leg I (%) | 25.0 | 23.2 | 24.3 | 24.8 (22.7–28.7) | 0.30 |
External claw height, leg III (m) | 14.1 | 10.7 | 14.1 | 12.2 (10.7–14.1) | 0.21 |
pt of external claw height, leg III (%) | 26.4 | 25.9 | 25.7 | 26.1 (22.7–30.2) | 0.34 |
External claw height, leg IV (m) | 15.5 | 11.8 | 15.9 | 14.3 (11.8–16.3) | 0.26 |
pt of external claw height, leg IV (%) | 29.2 | 28.6 | 29.1 | 30.4 (28–34.3) | 0.31 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Macrobiotus alekseevi
Tumanov, Denis V. 2005 |
Macrobiotus corgatensis
Pilato, Binda & Lisi 2002 |
Macrobiotus danielae
Pilato, Binda, Napolitano & Moncada 2001 |
Macrobiotus savai
Binda & Pilato 2001 |
Macrobiotus lorenae
Biserov 1996 |
Macrobiotus vanescens
Pilato, Binda & Catanzaro 1991 |
Macrobiotus peteri
Pilato, Claxton & Binda 1989 |
richtersi
Murray 1911 |