Diaporthe diospyrina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.98.104156 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AFCF6F28-04FD-5CEB-90C7-BBBC070E20C3 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaporthe diospyrina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaporthe diospyrina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan sp. nov.
Fig. 3 View Figure 3
Etymology.
Named after the host genus on which it was collected, Diospyros .
Description.
Sexual morph not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, conical, immersed in bark, scattered, erumpent through the surface, with a solitary locule. Locule undivided, 250-430 μm diam. Conidiophores cylindrical, attenuate towards the apex, hyaline, phialidic, unbranched, slightly curved, 10.0-27.0 × 0.5-2.0 μm (av. = 16.5 ± 4 × 1.3 ± 0.5 μm, n = 50). Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, phialidic, subcylindrical to cylindrical, 4.5-8.0 × 1.0-2.0 µm (av. = 6.2 ± 1.2 × 1.3 ± 0.2 µm, n = 50). Alpha conidia hyaline, aseptate, oval, one guttulate at each end, 7.5-9.0 × 2.0-3.5 μm (av. = 8.2 ± 0.6 × 2.8 ± 0.3 μm, n = 50), L/W = 2.0-3.5 (av. = 2.7 ± 0.4, n = 50). Beta conidia not observed.
Culture characteristics.
Colonies with felty aerial mycelium initially white, growing to 80 mm after 3 days, with a uniform texture and regular edge, becoming umber after 9 days. Conidiomata black, distributed randomly at the marginal area.
Specimens examined.
China, Beijing City, Yanqing Distinct, Yeya Lake , 40°25'31.25"N, 115°51'36.34"E, from branches of Diospyros kaki , 14 Jun 2022, Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan (holotype BJFC CF202212147, ex-type living culture: CFCC 58820; other living culture: CFCC 58821) GoogleMaps .
Notes.
Diaporthe diospyrina and D. diospyricola were isolated from the same host genus Diospyros ( Crous et al. 2013). Although D. diospyricola only has a sequence of the ITS locus, D. diospyrina can be distinguished from D. diospyricola by ITS (20/460). Morphologically, alpha conidia of D. diospyrina (7.5-9.0 μm) are longer than D. diospyricola (5.5-7.0 μm) ( Crous et al. 2013). Therefore, the current two isolates (CFCC 58820 and 58821) were identified as a new species, D. diospyrina .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |