Heterometrus serratus ( Pocock, 1900 ), 1945
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.18590/euscorpius.2016.vol2016.iss220.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DD0DF45D-F63A-4AA2-8EFF-03CF99E297EF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7124598 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B07187DF-A87B-FFE0-FEE1-FAB89FB4F90F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Heterometrus serratus ( Pocock, 1900 ) |
status |
|
Heterometrus serratus ( Pocock, 1900)
( Figs. 15 View Figures 12–15 , 508–534 View Figures 504–511 View Figures 512–515 View Figures 516–519 View Figures 520–525 View Figures 526–529 View Figures 530–534 , 571, 574 View Figures 571–574 )
Palamnaeus serratus Pocock, 1900: 86 , 97.
Heterometrus serratus: Takashima, 1945: 94 .
Heterometrus (Srilankametrus) serratus: Tikader & Bastawade, 1983: 555–561 , figs. 1483–1496; Fet, 2000: 448.
Heterometrus indus indus (in part): Couzijn, 1981: 121– 123, fig. 35 (in part).
Heterometrus indus (in part): Kovařík, 2004: 17–20 View Cited Treatment , fig. 16; Kovařík, 2009: 38.
T YPE LOCALITY AND TYPE REPOSITORY. Ceylon, now Sri Lanka; BMNH.
TYPE MATERIAL EXAMINED. Sri Lanka, Ceylon, 1♂ (holotype, fig. 16 in Kovařík, 2004: 19), leg. Dr. Ondaatje, BMNH No. 1888.55.
OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED. Sri Lanka, Southern Province, Matara District, Kekanadura village , 05° 58'28.2"N 080°36'20.5"E, 40 m a.s.l. (Locality 15CP, Fig. 594 View Figures 592–594 ), 30.IV.2015, 1♂ ( Figs. 509–513 View Figures 504–511 View Figures 512–515 , 516, 518 View Figures 516–519 , 520–522 View Figures 520–525 , 571 View Figures 571–574 ) 1♀ ( Figs. 508 View Figures 504–511 , 514–515 View Figures 512–515 , 517, 519 View Figures 516–519 , 523– 529 View Figures 520–525 View Figures 526–529 , 574 View Figures 571–574 ), FKCP, 1♀ im., UPSL, leg. Kovařík et al GoogleMaps .; Uva Province, Monaragala District, Monaragala , 06°52' 30.7"N 081°21'17"E, 288 m a.s.l. (Locality 15CQ, Fig. 595 View Figures 595–596 ), 2.–3.V.2015, 2♀, FKCP, leg. Kovařík et al GoogleMaps .
DIAGNOSIS. Total length 100–130 mm long. Color of adults uniformly reddish black to greenish black. Pectinal teeth number 12–15 in both sexes. Male with slightly narrower chela than female; chela length/ width ratio 1.79–1.94 in males, 1.69 in female. Chela hirsute, lobiform, without carinae on dorsoexternal surface, but may bear rows of granules. Chela length/ width ratio 1.8–2.0 in adults. Entire manus covered by rounded granules that may merge and appear as rows. Pedipalp patella without pronounced internal tubercle. Carapace smooth, glossy medially, with granules at margins. Second metasomal segment approximately as long as wide. Fifth segment of metasoma about as long pedipalp femur, fourth segment of metasoma shorter than pedipalp femur. Dorsal and dorsolateral carinae of metasomal segments granulated. Vesicle of telson usually longer than aculeus. Spination formula of tarsomeres II of legs: 3-4/4-6: 4/4-5: 4/5-6: 4/5-7.
COMMENTS. Palamnaeus serratus Pocock, 1900 was synonymized with H. indus by Couzijn (1981: 121). The first author ( Kovařík, 2004: 17 and Kovařík, 2009: 38) accepted the synonymy, whereas Tikader & Bastawade (1983: 555) considered H. serratus a valid species. Examination of additional specimens collected during the Sri Lankan expedition of 2015 convinced us that H. serratus is in fact a valid species. Pocock (1900: 86) differentiated H. serratus and H. indus as follows: 1) dorsal and dorsolateral carinae of metasomal segments granulated in H. serratus ( Fig. 574 View Figures 571–574 ), smooth in H. indus ( Fig. 573 View Figures 571–574 ). We found other minor differences: 2) sexual dimorphism in proportions of pedipalps not noticeable in H. indus , male with slightly narrower chela than female in H. serratus (chela length to width ratio 1.79–1.94 in males, 1.69 in the females); 3) carapace smooth and glossy, only occasionally with granules at margins in H. indus ( Figs. 486–487 View Figures 486–489 ); carapace smooth and glossy medially, always with more granules at margins in H. serratus ( Figs. 516–517 View Figures 516–519 ); 4) spination formula of tarsomeres II of legs: 3/4: 2-4/3-4: 4/4-5: 4/ 5 in H. indus ; 3-4/4-6: 4/4-5: 4/5-6: 4/ 5-7 in H. serratus .
The distribution of H. serratus was previously unknown, as the type locality was imprecise and the holotype male was the only known specimen. We collected additional specimens at localities cited here as 15CP ( Fig. 594 View Figures 592–594 ) and 15CQ ( Fig. 595 View Figures 595–596 ). Our data suggest that H. serratus is distributed in the southern part, and H. indus in the central part of Sri Lanka ( Fig. 15 View Figures 12–15 ).
DISTRIBUTION. Sri Lanka.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Heterometrus serratus ( Pocock, 1900 )
Kovařík, František, Lowe, Graeme, Ranawana, Kithsiri B., Hoferek, David & Š, V. A. 2016 |
Heterometrus (Srilankametrus) serratus: Tikader & Bastawade, 1983: 555–561
FET 2000: 448 |
TIKADER B. K. & D. B. BASTAWADE 1983: 561 |
Heterometrus serratus: Takashima, 1945: 94
TAKASHIMA, H. 1945: 94 |
Palamnaeus serratus
POCOCK, R. I. 1900: 86 |