Icochilus trilineatus Ameghino, 1894a

Fernández, Mercedes, Fernicola, Juan Carlos & Cerdeño, Esperanza, 2019, On the type materials of the genera Interatherium Ameghino, 1887 and Icochilus Ameghino, 1889 (Interatheriidae, Notoungulata, Mammalia) from early Miocene of the Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, Zootaxa 4543 (2), pp. 195-220 : 211

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:11F546CD-109F-4CBC-B87D-EA8D1AD0B96F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5931299

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B0798797-FFAA-2878-72CB-CFA3FE32FA40

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Icochilus trilineatus Ameghino, 1894a
status

 

Icochilus trilineatus Ameghino, 1894a

Syntypes. MACN-A 3633 ( Fig. 5 B View FIGURE 5 ), fragmented left maxilla with M2; and MACN-A 3651 to MACN-A 3657 ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 C–H), isolated cheek teeth .

Age and provenance of the type material. Santacrucian SALMA, early Miocene , Santa Cruz Province ( Argentina).

Original description ( Ameghino 1894a: 16). “ Cette espèce est de la même taille que l’ I. extensus , dont elle se distingue facilement aussi bien que des autres espèces, par la forme de ses molaires et prémolaires supérieures. Chacune de ces dents porte sur sa face externe un sillon large et profond qui la divise en deux lobules, et sur chaque lobule il y a un sillon étroit et profond qui le divise en deux colonnettes verticales; on voit ainsi sur la face externe de chaque dent, quatre colonnettes séparées par trois sillons, dont celui du milieu beaucoup plus large et les autres deux très étroits ”.

English translation. This species has the same size as Ic. extensus , from which it is easily distinguished, as well as from the other species, by the morphology of its upper molars and premolars. Each tooth presents a broad and deep groove on its external face, which divides it into two lobules, and on each lobule there is a narrow and deep groove that divides it into two vertical columns; as a result, the external face of each tooth exhibits four columns separated by three grooves, the second being the widest whereas the other two are very narrow.

Comments. Ameghino (1894a) did not illustrate this species. According to Ameghino’s catalogue and Mones (1986), MACN-A 3633, a small maxillary fragment with M2, is the type specimen of the species. The ectoloph of this M2 exhibits three perpendicular grooves, one in the middle and one at each lateral lobe, resulting in an ectoloph with four columns as indicated by Ameghino (1894a). Nonetheless, when describing the species, Ameghino (1894a: 16) alluded to the form of its upper molars and premolars, which implies that he had more than one tooth at hand, and therefore MACN-A 3633 cannot be the only type specimen. In this context, in the Ameghino Collection, the lot MACN-A 3651 to MACN-A 3657 contains six isolated teeth (instead of seven as corresponding inventory numbers), five of which (two M3, and three upper molariforms, probably P4 and/or M1/2) show the characteristics mentioned by Ameghino (1894a); thus, we consider them as part of the type series. As the specimens in the lot lack individual labels, it is not possible to identify which is the missing seventh tooth. Therefore, MACN-A 3633 and MACN-A 3651 to MACN-A 3657 (one currently missing) are considered the syntypes of Ic. trilineatus .

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF