Xestaspis kandy Eichenberger, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3160.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5248338 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B12087C5-FFB7-FF93-E3DD-32BE05D11D96 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Xestaspis kandy Eichenberger |
status |
sp. nov. |
Xestaspis kandy Eichenberger View in CoL View at ENA n. sp.
( Figs. 35–37 View FIGURE 35 View FIGURE 36 View FIGURE 37 )
Type material: Holotype male ( PBI_OON 00031918 ): Sri Lanka: Kandy, about 600 m, forest and waterworks, 7-11 August 1981 ( RMNH). Female paratype ( PBI_OON 00031413 ): collected with male holotype ( RMNH). Male paratype ( PBI_OON 00031412 ): collected with male holotype ( RMNH). Two male paratypes ( PBI_OON 00031925 ; PBI_OON 00031445 ): Sri Lanka: Horton Plains, 2200 m, forest litter, 13-15 August 1981 ( RMNH). Male paratype ( PBI_OON 00031446 ): Sri Lanka, Horton Plains, 2200 m, forest litter, 13-15 August 1981 ( NMBE). View Materials
Etymology: The species epithet refers to the town Kandy in Sri Lanka which is the type locality.
Diagnosis: Sternum with rows of large, droplike or rather channel-like, narrow pits between coxae I-II, II-III and III-IV (fig. 35. D). Resembles X. paulina n. sp. but male palpal conductor, distal part without dorsal tooth-like projection (fig. 37. C). Resembles X. biflocci n. sp. but carapace without posterolateral hair tufts of long, needle-like hairs (fig. 35. F).
Description: Description based on 6 males and 2 females.
MALE: Body length 2.38 mm. Uniformely orange-brown or red-brown colored species (figs. 35. A–C). Carapace pars cephalica strongly elevated in lateral view (fig. 35. C), posterolateral spikes and pits absent (fig. 35. F), lateral margin straight from dorsal view, cephalic setae u-shaped in single to double row. Anterior lateral eyes separated from edge of carapace by their radius or more, eye group by less than diameter of anterior lateral eyes narrower than clypeus (fig. 35. E). Anterior margin of sternum with continuous transverse groove, posterior extension laterally indented (fig. 35. D). Chelicerae inner margin with enlarged setae, labium anterior margin barely indented at middle. Abdomen scuto-pedicel region with paired curved to straight scutal ridge (psr) in addition with a second, upper, semicircular ridge (usr), (fig. 36. A), pedicel tube with tiny blunt, dorsolateral extensions (fig. 36. A), booklung covers (boc) small, elliptical, border elevated from surface (figs. 36. B, D–E); postepigastric scutum with short, posteriorly directed lateral apodemes. Legs patella plus tibia I shorter than carapace. No detailed description on promarginal chelicerae setae, serrula, grooves on lateral margin of sternum, trichobothria hood structure, tarsal organ and scopula between claws. Male genitalia: With a long slender, lamellar embolus (em), adjacent to an embolic accessory appendage (ma) and a lamellar conductor (co) (figs. 37. A–C). All appendages distally rounded, mesal embolic accessory appendage curved ventrally, conductor straight, without dorsal, tooth-like projection (fig. 37. C). Bulbus distally tapering into a pointed conical extension (ce) (figs. 37. A–B). Cymbium not extending beyond distal tip of bulb.
FEMALE: Body length 2.7 mm. Chelicerae inner margin without pairs of elongated setae. Female genitalia: Ventral view (fig. 36. C): Without external features. Dorsal view (figs. 37. D–E): receptaculum (re) ovoid, elongated, secretory sac (ssa) ovoid, globular appendix (gap) narrow, slightly shorter than 0.5 times the length of receptaculum, pore field of receptaculum (pof) distributed widely along the globular appendix, with an anterior paddlelike sclerite (psc) and a nail-like process (na), with lateral sclerites functioning as muscle attachments (A1). With lateral apodemes (lap) originating from the posterior spiracles.
Intraspecific variation:
Booklung covers anterolateral edge unmodified or with pointed tubercle (fig. 36. D–E); sternum row of large round pits between coxae III and IV well pronounced or reduced but not absent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.