Smeringopina ngungu, Huber, Bernhard A., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162115 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFD5-FFAB-B990-C768FCCC3AFE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smeringopina ngungu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smeringopina ngungu View in CoL new species
Figs. 842–855 View FIGURES 842 – 849 View FIGURES 850 – 855
Type. ♂ holotype from Congo D.R., Bas Congo Province, Thysville [=Mbanza-Ngungu; 5°15’S, 14°52’E, ~ 600 m a.s.l.], in large cave (1500 m), 6.x.1938 (M. Bequaert), in MRAC (1374-82, part).
Other material examined. Congo D.R.: Bas Congo: Grottes de Thysville, 1955 (Elias), 1♀ in MRAC (81948).
Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from known congeners by large clypeus projection with subdistal branch on posterior side and huge male cheliceral apophyses ( Figs. 847 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , 850 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ), by distinctive shape of procursus (slender distal element directed toward dorsally; Figs. 851, 852 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ), and by very small epigynum consisting of anterior sclerotized arc and posterior plate projecting into and largely filling this arc ( Figs. 848 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , 854 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ).
Male (holotype). Total body length 4.5, carapace width 1.6. Leg 1: 12.8 + 0.7 + 13.1, metatarsus broken, tibia 2: 8.8, tibia 3: 6.0, tibia 4: 8.5; tibia 1 L/d: 99. Distance PME-PME 195 µm, diameter PME 135 µm, distance PME- ALE 70 µm, distance AME-AME 45 µm, diameter AME 105 µm. Entire specimen apparently bleached, mostly pale ochre-yellow, carapace, clypeus and sternum without clear darker pattern, legs without darker rings, abdomen with barely visible darker pattern, ventral dark bands without lateral constriction. Habitus as in Fig. 842 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with very indistinct ‘pseudo-lenses’; clypeus with very strong and large median apophysis with subdistal branch on posterior side ( Figs. 847 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , 850 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ); deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Figs. 847 View FIGURES 842 – 849 and 850 View FIGURES 850 – 855 , with extremely long lateral proximal apophyses, pointed distal apophyses, without modified hairs. Palps as in Figs. 844–846 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , very small in relation to body size; coxa unmodified; trochanter with blunt ventral projection; femur with retrolatero-ventral apophysis directed toward ventrally and distally, without prolateral modification; prolateral femur-patella joint only slightly shifted toward ventrally; tarsus with few slightly stronger hairs dorsally (partly lost); procursus very simple, slender distal part curved toward dorsally, without hinge ( Figs. 851–852 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ); bulb with weakly sclerotized conical embolus ( Fig. 853 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs (most hairs missing), retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae. Gonopore apparently with two epiandrous spigots (not confirmed by SEM).
Female. In general similar to male; clypeus unmodified. Tibia 1: 11.5. Epigynum very small relative to abdomen ( Fig. 843 View FIGURES 842 – 849 ), consisting of anterior sclerotized arc and posterior plate projecting into and largely filling this arc ( Figs. 848 View FIGURES 842 – 849 , 854 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ); anteriorly with pair of membranous bulges arising medially and bent toward laterally, each filled with lamellar structures reminding of book-lung lamellae ( Fig. 855 View FIGURES 850 – 855 ; book-lungs situated more laterally and apparently not connected to these lamellae); internal genitalia as in Figs. 849 View FIGURES 842 – 849 and 855 View FIGURES 850 – 855 .
Distribution. Known from type locality only ( Fig. 293 View FIGURE 293 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |