Smeringopina mohoba, Huber, Bernhard A., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6161977 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFEB-FF95-B990-C6B3FCCD3A6A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smeringopina mohoba |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smeringopina mohoba View in CoL new species
Figs. 120–124 View FIGURES 115 – 124 , 164, 174 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 190–196 View FIGURES 190 – 196
Type. ♂ holotype from Gabon, Ogooué-Ivindo, near Mohoba Mozeye (0°16.8’N, 13°20.9’E), 510 m a.s.l., forest along road, 17.viii.2011 (B.A. & S.R. Huber), in ZFMK (Ar 10192).
Other material examined. GABON: Ogooué-Ivindo: near Mohoba Mozeye, same data as holotype, 1♀ together with holotype; same data, 1♀ 2 juvs. in pure ethanol, in ZFMK (Gab 167).
Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from congeners by distinctive process of clypeus (cylindrical, weakly sclerotized; Fig. 190 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ) and frontal apophyses on male chelicerae ( Figs. 194 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ; similar S. lekoni but much shorter), by sclerotized bulbal process ( Fig. 193 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ) and by oval anterior epigynal plate with pair of round, heavily sclerotized areas ( Figs. 164 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 195 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ).
Male (holotype). Total body length 2.9, carapace width 1.0. Leg 1: 23.8 (5.7 + 0.4 + 5.9 + 10.3 + 1.5), tibia 2: 3.7, tibia 3: 2.5, tibia 4: 4.0; tibia 1 L/d: 67. Distance PME-PME 90 µm, diameter PME 105 µm, distance PME- ALE 45 µm, distance AME-AME 25 µm, diameter AME 80 µm. Carapace ochre-yellow with brown triangular mark posteriorly and brown lateral margins; ocular area posteriorly brown, clypeus with indistinct brown pattern, sternum dark brown; legs light brown, femora with indistinct darker rings subdistally, tibiae with indistinct darker rings proximally and subdistally; abdomen ochre-gray with dark pattern dorsally, laterally, and ventrally, ventral dark bands with lateral constriction. Habitus as in Figs. 120–121 View FIGURES 115 – 124 , ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with indistinct ‘pseudo-lenses’; clypeus with cylindrical, weakly sclerotized process near rim ( Fig. 190 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ); deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 194 View FIGURES 190 – 196 , with lateral apophyses in very distal position, with distinctive, strongly ridged frontal apophyses, without modified hairs. Palps as in Figs. 122–124 View FIGURES 115 – 124 ; coxa with retrolateral apophysis; trochanter with strong but simply rounded ventral apophysis; femur with large retrolateral apophysis directed toward ventrally, with small apophysis at prolateral trochanter-femur joint, without slender ventral projection distally; prolateral femur-patella joint strongly shifted toward ventrally (hidden by bulb in Fig. 122 View FIGURES 115 – 124 ); tarsus with some longer and slightly stronger hairs dorsally; procursus as in Figs. 191–192 View FIGURES 190 – 196 , with complex membranous and sclerotized structures ventrally, without hinge; bulb with distinctive sclerotized process ( Fig. 193 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ; sperm duct opening not seen). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs (many hairs missing); retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae; pseudosegments barely visible.
Female. In general similar to male; clypeus unmodified. Tibia 1: 4.0. Epigynum anterior plate oval with pair of round, heavily sclerotized areas ( Fig. 164 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 195 View FIGURES 190 – 196 ); posterior plate laterally with overhanging folds; internal genitalia as in Figs. 174 View FIGURES 163 – 183 and 196 View FIGURES 190 – 196 .
Natural history. Litter-dwelling species.
Distribution. Known from type locality only ( Fig. 114 View FIGURE 114 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |