Palpimanus persicus, Zamani & Marusik, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1054.70408 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B67B23AA-E055-4911-BAC5-00C32921139D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/966664CC-AAFC-42AC-B3F8-D0BD28E26BA2 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:966664CC-AAFC-42AC-B3F8-D0BD28E26BA2 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Palpimanus persicus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Palpimanus persicus sp. nov.
Figures 13B, C View Figure 13 , 14C-F View Figure 14 , 15D-F View Figure 15 , 16A-D View Figure 16 , 17A-F View Figure 17
Type material.
Holotype ♂ (NHMW), Iran: Hormozgan Province: 40 km NW of Bandar Abbas, 7.4.1972 (G. Pretzmann). Paratype: 1♂ (NHMW), Hormozgan Province: 26 km S of Minab, 7.1974 (G. Pretzmann).
Other material examined.
Iran: Hormozgan Province: 1♀ (NHMW), 28 km N of Bandar Abbas, 28.3.1972 (G. Pretzmann) .
Etymology.
The specific epithet is an adjective of “Persian” or "of Persia", referring to the historical region of the Middle East, located in the east of Mesopotamia (nowadays Iran).
Diagnosis.
The male of this species differs from the closely related Palpimanus carmania sp. nov. by having the embolic stalk originating in the proximal half of the bulb (vs distal) and the stalk wider, not tapering, and its tip not pointed (cf. Fig. 16A and E View Figure 16 ). Endogyne of the new species is similar to that of P. sogdianus Charitonov, 1946 and specimens identified as P. cf. sogdianus from Azerbaijan (see Marusik and Guseinov 2003: figs 35-36), but it differs by having the anterior and posterior halves of the receptacles subequal in length (vs anterior halves longer). In addition, females of the new species differ from specimen from Azerbaijan by having the copulatory opening (Co) more arched.
Description.
Male (holotype). Habitus as in Figures 13C View Figure 13 , 14C View Figure 14 . Total length 5.20. Carapace 2.60 long, 1.95 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.21, ALE: 0.11, PME: 0.07, PLE: 0.13. Carapace, labium, chelicera, maxilla and sternum dark reddish, coated with white setae. Leg I dark orange, legs II-IV yellowish-brown, without annulations. Metatarsus I and metatarsi and tarsi II-IV with a distinct ventral hair tuft. Abdomen cream-colored, with scattered long dark setae and a ventral scutum, two long diagonal and two dot-like scutula (Fig. 14D View Figure 14 ). Spinnerets unicolourous. Measurements of legs: I: 5.57 (1.77, 1.46, 1.27, 0.57, 0.50), II: 4.74 (1.44, 0.92, 1.10, 0.72, 0.56), III: 4.23 (1.29, 0.76, 1.03, 0.70, 0.45), IV: 5.01 (1.53, 0.93, 1.20, 0.91, 0.44).
Palp as in Figures 15D-F View Figure 15 , 16A-D View Figure 16 ; tibia swollen, as wide as long; cymbium 1.6 times longer than wide; embolic stalk (Es) originates in proximal half of bulb, wide, not tapering, tip not pointed.
Female. Habitus as in Figures 13B View Figure 13 , 14E View Figure 14 . Total length 6.55. Carapace 3.00 long, 2.27 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.17, ALE: 0.11, PME: 0.07, PLE: 0.11. Coloration and somatic features as in male. Postgaster with 3 pairs of scutula (Fig. 14F View Figure 14 ). Measurements of legs: I: 6.78 (2.17, 1.80, 1.62, 0.61, 0.58), II: 5.71 (1.76, 1.16, 1.32, 0.83, 0.64), III: 5.06 (1.50, 0.93, 1.17, 0.86, 0.60), IV: 6.77 (2.04, 1.19, 1.66, 1.32, 0.56).
Endogyne as in Figure 17A-F View Figure 17 ; copulatory opening (Co) arched in ventral view and squared in posterior view; endogyne weakly sclerotized, receptacles about 3.5 times longer than wide, each with cylindrical posterior part and subglobular anterior part, posterior parts converging, receptacles lacking distinct accessorial or pore glands; fine threads (Ft) originate near copulatory opening; grape-shaped glands (Gg) poorly distinct, about 5 on each side.
Comment.
As the single female specimen treated here was collected separately from the males and in a different locality (although all from the same province and from sites relatively close to one another), it was not considered within the type material; the conspecificity of these specimens shall be confirmed when both sexes are collected together.
Distribution.
Known only from the listed localities in Hormozgan Province, southern Iran.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |