Playfordiidae, Dzik, 2002
|
publication ID |
1732-2421 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B3474D00-872D-A513-FCF7-3AAAFCFE1F93 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Playfordiidae |
| status |
|
Family Playfordiidae nov.
Diagnosis.—Elements of the apparatus with very thin, finely denticulated blades and very wide basal cavity; little shape differentiation within the apparatus.
Remark.—Despite its originally suggested icriodontid affinities, the apparatus of Playfordia primitiva ( Bischoff and Ziegler, 1957) is basically different from those of the icriodontids in not showing distinction between the platform series and the symmetry transition series elements, as discussed above ( Fig. 15). Some remote similarities to the Early Carboniferous Eotaphrus can be traced, but there is too long time hiatus separating these genera. Symmetrical elements of Playfordia resemble superficially Ancyrognathus ancyrognathoideus ( Ziegler, 1958) (see Wang 1994: pl. 10: 1) but to make them homologous would require to assume that the basal cone of Playfordia is an extremely thin platform derived from that of Ancyrognathus . They also differ in surface ornamentation (see Figs. 15B and 28), which in the ancyrognathids, as well as in Dinodus , is covered with cell imprints and not finely tuberculated. Moreover, the stratigraphic occurrence of Playfordia makes it derivation from Ancyrognathus unlikely.
Genera included.—Only Playfordia Glenister and Klapper, 1966 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
