Synagelides forkiforma Yang, Zhu & Song, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1153 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4D3CCD86-6CA9-42A6-BFFA-EABC6797C045 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4329863 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B35987D7-145C-8328-FE73-AD770A48FC36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Synagelides forkiforma Yang, Zhu & Song, 2007 |
status |
|
Synagelides forkiforma Yang, Zhu & Song, 2007 View in CoL
Figs 3–4 View Fig View Fig , 17B View Fig
Synagelides forkiforma Yang, Zhu & Song, 2007: 2 View in CoL , figs 2a–d (d = ♂).
Differential diagnosis
The male of Synagelides forkiforma can easily be distinguished from all other congeners by the presence of a short spine-shaped prong on the ventral surface of the retrolateral tibial apophysis. The female of S. forkiforma resembles that of S. lushanensis Xie & Yin, 1990 ( Xie & Yin 1990: figs 8–15) in having an anterior epigynal hood and a pair of lateral arcuated rims, but differs in: 1) epigynal hood is about one-third as long as epigynum in S. forkiforma ( Fig. 4A View Fig ), whereas about one-fifth as long as epigynum in S. lushanensis ( Xie & Yin 1990: fig. 14); 2) median septum is almost triangular in S. forkiforma ( Fig. 4A View Fig ), whereas trapeziform in S. lushanensis ( Xie & Yin 1990: fig. 14).
Material examined
CHINA • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Yunnan Province, Fugong County, Maji Township, Flum above Gaxai R. near, Majimi Village , Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve ; 27°24.18′ N, 98°49.47′ E; ca 1500 m a.s.l.; 28 Apr. 2004; C. Griswold and D.H. Kavanaugh leg.; HNU-20040428-01–03 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (HNU-20040428-01)
Total length 4.04. Carapace 1.81 long, 1.37 wide. Abdomen 2.15 long, 1.04 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.42, ALE 0.24, PLE 0.22, AREW 1.33, PERW 1.41, EFL 1.02. Legs: I 7.25 (2.39, 3.90, 0.57, 0.39), II 3.53 (1.12, 1.34, 0.68, 0.39), III 3.70 (1.12, 1.34, 0.85, 0.39), IV lost. Carapace ( Fig. 4D View Fig ) stippled, yellow, with a pair of dark patches anteriorly, covered by sparse hairs. Eye base black except the AME base brown. Fovea oval, hollowed. Chelicerae ( Fig. 4G View Fig ) yellow, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth fissident. Endites ( Fig. 4E View Fig ) pale yellow, slightly longer than wide, the inner margin with hairs. Labium ( Fig. 4E View Fig ) colored as labium, with dense hairs apically. Sternum ( Fig. 4E View Fig ) pale yellow, scutiform. Legs pale yellow to yellow. Spination of leg I ( Fig. 4H View Fig ): femur v2- 2-2-2-1; metatarsus v0-2-2. Abdomen ( Fig. 4 View Fig D–E) elongated; dorsum brown, with a pale transverse band and two pairs of muscle depressions medially, herringbone stripes indistinct; venter gray-white, with irregular brown patches median-posteriorly. Palp ( Figs 3 View Fig A–D, 17B): patella slightly longer than wide in retrolateral view; retrolateral tibial apophysis slender and more than half as long as cymbium, with a ventral, short spine-shaped prong; the second retrolateral tibial apophysis paliform; cymbium hairy, with dorsal and prolateral apophyses; bulb inflated, with sperm duct sinuous in retrolateral view; embolus spiraling and tapering to a slightly pointed tip that reaches cymbium apex; median apophysis complicated, with processes.
Female (HNU-20040428-02)
Total length 4.41. Carapace 1.98 long, 1.47 wide. Abdomen 2.34 long, 1.25 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.41, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.22, AREW 1.33, PERW 1.54, EFL 1.11. Legs: I 5.39 (1.66, 2.71, 0.63, 0.39), II 3.44 (1.05, 1.32, 0.68, 0.39), III 3.59 (1.05, 1.30, 0.85, 0.39) IV 5.02(1.37, 2.02,
1.22, 0.41). Habitus ( Fig. 4F View Fig ) similar to that of male except paler and lacking the pale transverse band on the dorsum of abdomen. Epigyne ( Fig. 4 View Fig A–C) longer than wide, with an anterior hood about 2.5 times longer than wide and a pair of lateral arcuated rims; atrium large, separated by a triangular median septum; copulatory openings located postero-laterally; copulatory ducts almost S-shaped, terminating with gland ducts, which almost extend transversely; spermathecae reniform, touching each other anteriorly; fertilization ducts slightly longer than gland ducts, extending antero-obliquely.
Distribution
China (Yunnan) ( Fig. 18 View Fig ).
Comments
The known drawings of the holotype of S. forkiforma are difficult to interpret due to poor print quality. Although the type specimens were not examined in the present contribution, the clear, original drawings of the holotype provided by Prof. Zi-Zhong Yang, who described the species, were compared with the specimens examined here from Fugong County. The male from Fugong is almost indistinguishable from the holotype, and the female from Fugong shares similar markings with the Fugong male. Fugong County is also near the type locality (the distance between the collecting site in Fugong and type locality is less than 150 kilometers) and both localities belong to Gaoligong Mountain and have similar climatic and environmental conditions. Based on the above evidence, the specimens collected from Fugong County are identified here as new material of S. forkiforma .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Synagelides forkiforma Yang, Zhu & Song, 2007
Wang, Cheng, Mi, Xiao-Qi, Irfan, Muhammad & Peng, Xian-Jin 2020 |
Synagelides forkiforma
Yang Z. Z. & Zhu M. S. & Song D. X. 2007: 2 |