Satureja boissieri Hausskn. ex Boiss.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/adansonia2024v46a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11072781 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B4697C4F-FF87-FFDD-FC15-2324FE6876D7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Satureja boissieri Hausskn. ex Boiss. |
status |
|
Satureja boissieri Hausskn. ex Boiss. View in CoL
Flora Orientalis 4: 565 ( Boissier 1879). —
Type: Turkey • Anatolia, in monte Akdagh Cataonia inter Malatya et Adiaman ; 13.IX.1865; Haussknecht s.n.; holo-, G [ G00786097 image!]; iso-, JE [ JE00013746 image!]) .
SPECIMEN EXAMINED. — Turkey • Adıyaman, Yazıbaşı village ; alt. 2000 m; 30.IX.2001; K.KietIk F.S. 1027 (Herbarium of Balıkesir University) [image!] .
NOTES
Satureja boissieri was reported from Iran in Flora Iranica ( Rechinger 1982) from a single locality in North of Iran, Golestan Province, 14 km E Chaman Bid. Later, this species was also reported from Iran in Flora of Iran ( Jamzad 2012) based on three specimens collected from the same area as well as Golestan Province, Tang-e Rah to Tang-e Gol and Gilan Province, Amlash, Blourdakan, Khasildasht. Satureja boissieri is morphologically close to S. mutica in the characteristics of the flowers such as the color of corolla and the size of calyx but the former species markedly can be identified by its terminal inflorescence. By the exploring of this species in North and NE of Iran and with the study of herbarium materials deposited in TUH, IRAN, and MIR, we do not confirm the occurrence of S. boissieri in Iran, and therefore, it is excluded from the flora of Iran. The specimens from Khasildasht, Tang-e Gol and Chaman Bid are all belong to Satureja mutica . We conclude that its report from Iran was a misidentification for S. mutica .
G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
JE |
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |