Aloe × nobilis Haworth (1812: 78)

Smith, Gideon F., Figueiredo, Estrela, Verloove, Filip, Klopper, Ronell R. & Silva, Vasco, 2023, An annotated catalogue of Aloe and Aloiampelos (Asphodelaceae subfam. Alooideae) naturalised and escaped in continental Portugal, Phytotaxa 629 (1), pp. 35-52 : 41-43

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.629.1.3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10257589

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B5213461-455D-FFD2-99A8-FAECFD220E78

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Aloe × nobilis Haworth (1812: 78)
status

 

3. Aloe × nobilis Haworth (1812: 78) View in CoL pro sp. ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ).

Locally used synonyms:—None recorded.

Common name(s):— Portuguese: None recorded. English: golden tooth aloe.

Description:—Plants acaulescent or with short stem up to 0.2 m long; rosettes profusely suckering from the base to form large , dense, mound-shaped clusters. Leaves generally densely rosulate, erectly spreading to slightly in- or recurved, 10–15 × (2–) 4–6 cm, lanceolate-triangular to lanceolate-deltoid, dark green, white maculations generally lacking, both ad- and especially abaxial surfaces sometimes with scattered teeth on white base; margin concolorous; marginal teeth ± 10 mm apart, (3–) 5 mm long, firm, white to slightly yellowish. Inflorescence 0.5–0.8 m high, erect, sometimes 1-branched. Racemes 10–20(–30) cm long, cylindrical-conical, subdense. Floral bracts ± 15–18 × (5–) 6 mm. Pedicels 25–30 mm long. Flowers: perianth 35–40 mm long, 6–8 mm across ovary, of ± even diameter throughout, very slightly narrowing towards mouth, ± straight, cylindric, bright orangey red; outer segments free for 10–12 mm; stamens exserted 2–4 mm; style exserted to 5 mm. Capsules not seen.

Flowering time:—(May–)June–July(–September).

Habitat:—Coastal dunes.

First mention of the species as naturalised in Portugal:—Not previously recorded.

Localities recorded:—Ag (Praia do Amado, near Portimão).

Country / region of origin:—A hybrid that very likely originated in Europe.

Secondary distribution range:— Aloe × nobilis is very rarely reported as an escape, doubtlessly owing to it being confused with A. mitriformis Miller (1768 : first page headed “ALO-ALO”, species # 1), one of its alleged parents. It can be reasonably assumed that at least some of the naturalised populations of the latter in fact refer to A. × nobilis . Guillot Ortiz & Laguna Lumbreras (2019) published the first Spanish (and European) record of A. × nobilis in the wild. Its status in Spain is uncertain; however, in Catalonia it is considered to be merely ephemeral ( Aymerich & Sáez 2019).

Status in Portugal:—Naturalised.

References:— Smith & Figueiredo (2015a: 156, 2015b: 75).

Notes:— Aloe × nobilis View in CoL is most often misidentified as A. perfoliata Linnaeus (1753: 319–320) View in CoL . The name A. perfoliata View in CoL is variously interpreted, with, most recently, the proposal having been made that the name applies to what has been known consistently as A. microstigma View in CoL Salm-Reifferscheid-Dyck (1854: 6, § 26, f. 4) ( Mottram 2013; see also Klopper et al. 2016). However, the true identity of A. perfoliata View in CoL remains uncertain ( Klopper et al. 2016).

Reynolds (1950: 385) and Grace et al. (2011: 110) suggest A. arborescens View in CoL and A. mitriformis View in CoL as possible parents of A. × nobilis View in CoL . Based on its comparatively small stature, Smith & Figueiredo (2015a: 156, 2015b: 75) speculate that A. brevifolia Miller (1768 View in CoL : first erratum page) and A. mitriformis View in CoL could be the parents of this hybrid. However, the leaves of the latter two species, especially those of A. brevifolia View in CoL , are generally variously glaucous green, while those of Aloe × nobilis View in CoL are a deep green colour ( Fig. 4A, C–D View FIGURE 4 ). The subdense, cylindrical-conical inflorescences of A. × nobilis View in CoL are reminiscent of those of A. brevifolia View in CoL ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). All three putative parents have been in cultivation in Europe for several centuries ( Cullen 1986: 159 [ A. brevifolia View in CoL ], 160 [ A. mitriformis View in CoL , in error as A. perfoliata View in CoL ], 161 [ A. arborescens View in CoL ]). Aloe × nobilis View in CoL itself was not mentioned in Webb (1980) nor in Cullen (1986) though. Note that reference to A. perfoliata View in CoL in Webb (1980: 20 [species # 6]) is in fact to A. mitriformis View in CoL , as evidenced by, inter alia, mention of “Racemes […] subcapitate”.

Aloe × nobilis View in CoL is clearly an old hybrid that has remained well-known in European horticulture. In the late-1700s, it was for example illustrated by the Bauer brothers for Father Boccius’s Liber regni vegetabilis, also known as Codex Liechtenstein, some years before it was formally named by Adrian H. Haworth in 1812 ( Mabberley 2017: 3). This nothospecies has remained popular in outdoor cultivation in parts of southern Europe with a mild-climate ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ), but also thrives under glass in more severe climates.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Liliopsida

Order

Asparagales

Family

Asphodelaceae

Genus

Aloe

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF