Urodeta
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.210188 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6169136 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B63787F8-0A29-FFF3-66CC-A18EFA29FB4A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2016-04-13 07:26:21, last updated 2024-11-29 11:34:56) |
scientific name |
Urodeta |
status |
|
Key to the species of Urodeta View in CoL based on female genitalia*
1. Corpus bursae with signum............................................................................ 2
- Corpus bursae without signum......................................................................... 10
2. Both pairs of apophyses (anteriores and posteriores) present.................................................. 3
- Apophyses anteriores absent........................................................................... 8
3. Apophyses posteriores very short, about 4.5 times longer than wide ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 42–49)...... U. bucera
- Apophyses posteriores long, more than 9 times longer than wide............................................... 4
4. Signum formed by weakly sclerotized plate with four large teeth in row (Kaila 2011, fig. 98).................. U. inusta View in CoL
- Signum without four teeth in row....................................................................... 5
5. Ductus bursae not coiled, gradually broadened cephalically, almost smoothly continued to corpus bursae............... 6
- Ductus bursae coiled or not coiled, much narrower than corpus bursae.......................................... 7
6. Dorsal wall of antrum covered by small spines; ductus bursae with longitudinal folds; signum sickle-shaped (figs 6–10).............................................................................................. U. acinacella
- Dorsal wall of antrum without small spines; ductus bursae without longitudinal folds; signum not sickle-shaped ( Koster & Sinev 2003, fig. 55)........................................................................ U. hibernella
7. Ductus bursae coiled, with internal spines; signum formed by one sickle-shaped spine and weakly sclerotized transverse plate covered with tiny spines ( Sruoga & De Prins 2009, figs 41–43)...................................... U. falciferella View in CoL
- Ductus bursae not coiled, without internal spines; signum formed by two weakly connected plates, each with a large spine and few smaller ones (figs 14–16)................................................................ U. quadrifida
8. Apophyses posteriores present, very short; ductus bursae not coiled............................................ 9
- Apophyses absent; ductus bursae coiled ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 77–82).............................. U. talea
9. Signum formed by weakly sclerotized plate with four long teeth in row; corpus bursae without internal spines ( Mey 2007, figs 30, 31).................................................................................... U. maculata View in CoL
- Signum formed by oval sclerotized plate with one large and several small spines; corpus bursae with internal spines, arranged in rows of 3–8 ones (figs 24–28)................................................................ U. trilobata
10. Apophyses posteriores vestigial, apophyses anteriores absent (Kaila 2011, fig. 99)....... U. sp. reared from Terminalia View in CoL sp.
- Apophyses posteriores and anteriores present............................................................. 11
11. Corpus bursae divided by narrow prolonged constriction into two parts ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 29–32).... U. acerba
- Corpus bursae not divided............................................................................ 12
12. Corpus bursae narrow and long, about 4 times longer than wide ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 21, 22)........ U. absidata
- Corpus bursae rounded............................................................................... 13
13. Antrum with strongly sclerotized longitudinal folds ( Sruoga & De Prins 2009, figs 48, 49)................. U. spatulata View in CoL
- Antrum without strongly sclerotized longitudinal folds..................................................... 14
14. Colliculum about 3 times longer than wide; antrum long and weakly sclerotized ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 66–71)................................................................................................... U. faro
- Colliculum as long as wide; antrum short and strongly sclerotized ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 85–88)....... U. tortuosa
Koster, S. & Sinev, S. (2003) Momphidae, Batrachedridae, Stathmopodidae, Agonoxenidae, Cosmopterigidae, Chrysopeleiidae. In: Huemer, P., Karsholt, O. & Lyneborg, L. (Eds) Microlepidoptera of Europe, 5, 1 - 387.
Mey, W. (2007) Microlepidoptera: Smaller families. In: Mey, W. (Ed.) The Lepidoptera of the Brandberg Massif in Namibia. Part 2. Esperiana Memoir, 4, 9 - 30.
Sruoga, V. & De Prins, J. (2009) The Elachistinae (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae) of Kenya with descriptions of eight new species. Zootaxa, 2172, 1 - 31.
Sruoga, V. & De Prins, J. (2011) New species of Elachistinae (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae) from Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Zootaxa, 3008, 1 - 32.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Elachistinae |
1 (by plazi, 2016-04-13 07:26:21)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2016-12-19 19:20:35)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2016-12-19 19:22:20)
4 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-06-14 00:22:06)
5 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-06-14 00:32:28)
6 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-06-14 12:05:39)
7 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-06-14 12:17:37)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 18:59:22)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-18 09:24:59)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-18 16:00:22)
11 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-30 11:23:13)
12 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-19 18:03:56)
13 (by plazi, 2023-10-26 10:25:53)