Urodeta

Prins, Jurate De & Sruoga, Virginijus, 2012, A review of the taxonomic history and biodiversity of the genus Urodeta (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae: Elachistinae), with description of new species, Zootaxa 3488, pp. 41-62 : 58

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.210188

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6169136

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B63787F8-0A29-FFF3-66CC-A18EFA29FB4A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Urodeta
status

 

Key to the species of Urodeta View in CoL based on female genitalia*

1. Corpus bursae with signum............................................................................ 2

- Corpus bursae without signum......................................................................... 10

2. Both pairs of apophyses (anteriores and posteriores) present.................................................. 3

- Apophyses anteriores absent........................................................................... 8

3. Apophyses posteriores very short, about 4.5 times longer than wide ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 42–49)...... U. bucera

- Apophyses posteriores long, more than 9 times longer than wide............................................... 4

4. Signum formed by weakly sclerotized plate with four large teeth in row (Kaila 2011, fig. 98).................. U. inusta View in CoL

- Signum without four teeth in row....................................................................... 5

5. Ductus bursae not coiled, gradually broadened cephalically, almost smoothly continued to corpus bursae............... 6

- Ductus bursae coiled or not coiled, much narrower than corpus bursae.......................................... 7

6. Dorsal wall of antrum covered by small spines; ductus bursae with longitudinal folds; signum sickle-shaped (figs 6–10).............................................................................................. U. acinacella

- Dorsal wall of antrum without small spines; ductus bursae without longitudinal folds; signum not sickle-shaped ( Koster & Sinev 2003, fig. 55)........................................................................ U. hibernella

7. Ductus bursae coiled, with internal spines; signum formed by one sickle-shaped spine and weakly sclerotized transverse plate covered with tiny spines ( Sruoga & De Prins 2009, figs 41–43)...................................... U. falciferella View in CoL

- Ductus bursae not coiled, without internal spines; signum formed by two weakly connected plates, each with a large spine and few smaller ones (figs 14–16)................................................................ U. quadrifida

8. Apophyses posteriores present, very short; ductus bursae not coiled............................................ 9

- Apophyses absent; ductus bursae coiled ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 77–82).............................. U. talea

9. Signum formed by weakly sclerotized plate with four long teeth in row; corpus bursae without internal spines ( Mey 2007, figs 30, 31).................................................................................... U. maculata View in CoL

- Signum formed by oval sclerotized plate with one large and several small spines; corpus bursae with internal spines, arranged in rows of 3–8 ones (figs 24–28)................................................................ U. trilobata

10. Apophyses posteriores vestigial, apophyses anteriores absent (Kaila 2011, fig. 99)....... U. sp. reared from Terminalia View in CoL sp.

- Apophyses posteriores and anteriores present............................................................. 11

11. Corpus bursae divided by narrow prolonged constriction into two parts ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 29–32).... U. acerba

- Corpus bursae not divided............................................................................ 12

12. Corpus bursae narrow and long, about 4 times longer than wide ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 21, 22)........ U. absidata

- Corpus bursae rounded............................................................................... 13

13. Antrum with strongly sclerotized longitudinal folds ( Sruoga & De Prins 2009, figs 48, 49)................. U. spatulata View in CoL

- Antrum without strongly sclerotized longitudinal folds..................................................... 14

14. Colliculum about 3 times longer than wide; antrum long and weakly sclerotized ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 66–71)................................................................................................... U. faro

- Colliculum as long as wide; antrum short and strongly sclerotized ( Sruoga & De Prins 2011, figs 85–88)....... U. tortuosa

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Momphidae

SubFamily

Elachistinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF