Meganola subchionea, László, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D310B8C8-A16F-4B55-B6E6-8FD5EC35DE63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4410685 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B804878C-FFD9-A416-FF69-3C132D5FF99D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meganola subchionea |
status |
sp. nov. |
Meganola subchionea sp. n.
( Figs 34 View FIGURES 21–40 , 76 View FIGURES 75–83 )
Holotype. ♂, Ivory Coast, 174m, Tai NP, Tai Research Station , 05°49’59.8”N, 07°20’32.0”W, 14–23.XI.2015, Light Trap, Aristophanous, M., Moretto, P., Ruzzier, E. leg., ANHRT:2017.16, unique number: ANHRTUK 00009099, slide No.: LGNA 139 ♂ ( ANHRT). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. The new species belongs to the M. chionea species-group, being most closely related to M. chionea ( Hampson, 1911) with its pale greyish white forewing ground colour and the broad, almost straight, obtuse pale grey medial band of the forewing. As the species-group comprises several externally indistinguishable species, examination of the genitalia is required for reliable identification. In the male genitalia, M. subchionea differs clearly from M. chionea by its somewhat broader uncus and considerably narrower harpe and the vesica armed with a pair of short but heavily sclerotized, thorn-like cornuti (the vesica of M. chionea bears a peculiar elongate, crest-like, dentate cornutus). The female is unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |