Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth, 2000 in Thomas, Orth, Horeau & Dominique (2000)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF3616F2-7760-4A21-9872-0A801D71DBA1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4397195 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B8347971-FFBC-FF87-6DE0-825AFEF00AB5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth, 2000 in Thomas, Orth, Horeau & Dominique (2000) |
status |
|
Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth, 2000 in Thomas, Orth, Horeau & Dominique (2000) View in CoL
( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 )
Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth 2000: 50 View in CoL , (nymph); Domínguez et al., 2019: 379–381, figs. 2–3 (male imago); Neto et al. 2020: 345.
Material examined. 1 male subimago; Amapá; M. Amapá; Rio Amapá Grande, Cachoeira Grande ; 3 m alt.; 02º09’43.1”N / 50º55’17.3”W; 07.viii.2011; A. Pes, P. V GoogleMaps . Cruz, A. Fernandes, N. Hamada cols; light trap; INPA .
Diagnosis. Male imago: (1) penis lobes widely separated from each other ( Figure 2c View FIGURE 2 ); (2) base of each penis lobe, on outer margin, without expansion; (3) telopenis broad; (4) inner margin of basal 1/3 of forceps segment I smoothly rounded.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth, 2000 in Thomas, Orth, Horeau & Dominique (2000)
Cruz, Paulo Vilela, Gonçalves, Inês C., Mariano, Rodolfo & Hamada, Neusa 2020 |
Bessierus doloris Thomas & Orth 2000: 50
Neto, J. L. G. & Passos, M. A. B. & Costa, M. P. 2020: 345 |
Dominguez, E. & Cuezzo, M. G. & Clavier, S. 2019: 379 |