Periclimenes dardanicola, Bruce & Okuno, 2006

Bruce, Alexander J. & Okuno, Junji, 2006, Periclimenes dardanicola n. sp., a new species of hermit crab associated shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae) from the western Pacific, Zoosystema 28 (2), pp. 367-377 : 368-376

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5401754

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B92E87B4-FFF7-FF81-FCC2-FD8E7FF4F9CD

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Periclimenes dardanicola
status

sp. nov.

Periclimenes dardanicola View in CoL n. sp.

( Figs 1-4 View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG )

Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus View in CoL – Holthuis 1952: 40, figs 9, 10. Not Periclimenes parvus Borradaile, 1898 View in CoL .

Periclimenes parvus View in CoL – Bruce 1977: 3 (in part). — Li 2000: 221, fig. 288 (in part). — Bruce 2003: 239 (in part).

Periclimenes soror View in CoL – Takeda 1986: 116, unnumbered fig. in colour. Not Periclimenes soror Nobili, 1904 View in CoL .

Periclimenes imperator View in CoL – Debelius 1999: 235, unnumbered fig. in colour. Not Periclimenes imperator Bruce, 1967 View in CoL .

Pontoniinae sp. – Minemizu 2000: 58, unnumbered figs in colour.

TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype: Japan. Kuryo, Numazu, Izu Peninsula, Suruga Bay, Honshu, 35°01.2’N, 138°49.9’E, 21 m, scuba, associated with Calliactis japonica (Carlgren, 1928) ( Actiniaria , Hormathiidae ) on Tonna luteostoma (Kuster, 1857) (Discopoda, Tonnidae ) occupied by Dardanus crassimanus (H. Milne Edwards, 1836) (Anomura, Diogenidae ), 28.XII.2000, coll. R. Minemizu, ♂ 2.2 mm CL ( CMNH-ZC 01894).

Paratypes: Japan. Ose-zaki, Numazu, Izu Peninsula, Suruga Bay, Honshu, 35°01.6’N, 138°47.2’E, 5 m, scuba, associated with Calliactis japonica on Charonia lampas sauliae (Reeve, 1844) (Discopoda, Ranellidae ) occupied by Dardanus arrosor (Herbst, 1796) (Anomura, Diogenidae ), 22.I.2004, coll. T. Yanagisawa, 1 ♀ 2.4 mm CL ( QM W 27972). — Off Enashi, Nishiura, Numazu, Izu Peninsula, Suruga Bay, Honshu, 35°01.2’N, 138°48.8’E, 12 m, scuba, associated with sea anemone on gastropod shells occupied by Dardanus sp. , 13.IV.2005, coll.H. Watanabe, 1 ♀ 3.6 mm CL ( CMNH-ZC 01895).

Indonesia. Siboga , stn 79b, Kabala dua Island, Borneo Bank, 22 m, 12-13. VI.1899, 1 ♂ ( ZMA De.201484).

Vietnam. Tre Island, Nha Trang Bay, Vietnam, 25 m, scuba, in gastropod shells ( Cassis sp. ) occupied by Dardanus lagopodes (Forskål, 1775) (Anomura, Diogenidae ), without sea anemones, 30. VI.2004, coll. I. Marin, 1 ♂ 3.7 mm CL; 1 ovig. ♀ 4.0 mm CL ( QM W 27971).

ETYMOLOGY. — The specific name is a combination of Dardanus , the generic name of hermit crab of the family Diogenidae , and the Latin cola (dweller), in reference to the association of the new species.

DISTRIBUTION. — Suruga Bay, Honshu, Japan; Vietnam; Borneo, Indonesia.

DESCRIPTION

A small-sized, moderately robust pontoniine shrimp with subcylindrical body form ( Fig. 1A View FIG ).

Carapace ( Fig. 1A, C View FIG ) smooth, glabrous; supraorbital spine absent; orbit feebly developed, inferior orbital angle distinctly produced, tapering distally; antennal spine small, acute, marginal, subequal to level of tip of inferior orbital angle; hepatic spine small, distinctly ventral to level of antennal spine, slightly posterior to level of most proximal rostral dorsal tooth; pterygostomial margin not produced, bluntly angular.

Rostrum ( Fig. 1B, C View FIG ) well developed, 0.8-0.9 of carapace length, slightly directed ventrally, distally acute, reaching or slightly overreaching level of distal margin of antennular peduncle; dorsal carina armed with five or six large, equidistant, acute teeth, interspaced by short setae, most proximal tooth at level of posterior orbital margin; ventral carina obsolete proximally, distinct distally, armed with single small acute subterminal tooth at level of interspace between terminal and preterminal dorsal teeth, distal margin convex; lateral carina conspicuous.

Fourth thoracic sternite without finger-like median process, anterior transverse ridge with shallow median notch. Posterior transverse ridge of fifth thoracic sternite with shallow median notch.

Abdominal somites ( Fig. 1A View FIG ) smooth, glabrous, third somite not posterodorsally produced; pleura of first to third somites truncate; pleura of fourth and fifth somites posteriorly produced, rounded; sixth somite short, 0.4-0.5 of carapace length, posteroventral margin produced, acute. Telson ( Fig. 1D View FIG ) 1.1-1.8 times as long as sixth abdominal somite, feebly tapering posteriorly, lateral margin sub-straight, posterior margin bluntly produced centrally; dorsal surface armed with two pairs of small spines at 0.6 and 0.8 of telson length; posterior margin normally with three pairs of spines, lateral spines small, intermediate spines longest, robust, submedian spines slender, setulose ( Fig. 1E View FIG ); holotype with accessory spine present at posterolateral margin ( Fig. 1D View FIG ).

Eye ( Fig. 1B View FIG ) with large, globular cornea, with distinct ocellus; stalk short, anterior margin convex, maximum width subequal to, or slightly wider than maximum corneal diameter.

Antennular peduncle ( Fig. 1F View FIG ) reaching or falling slightly short of tip of rostrum; proximal segment longer than distal two segments combined; distolateral margin convex, rounded, anteriorly setose, lateral margin slightly convex, terminating in small acute tooth overreaching distolateral margin; ventromedial margin armed with small acute tooth; stylocerite short, slender, acute, falling slightly short of level of mid-length of proximal segment; statocyst normally developed; intermediate segment short, robust, obliquely articulated with distal segment, lateral margin slightly convex, sparsely setose, distomedial margin with long setae; distal segment slightly longer than intermediate segment, non-setose. Upper flagellum biramous, proximal seven segments fused, shorter free ramus with four segments; lower flagellum more slender than upper flagellum.

Antenna ( Fig. 1G View FIG ) with stout basicerite armed with subacute lateral tooth; carpocerite reaching level of proximal two fifths of length of scaphocerite; scaphocerite overreaching tip of rostrum by distal fourth, broad, 2.4-2.6 times as long as maximum width, lateral margin almost straight, terminating in acute tooth falling slightly short of distal margin of lamella, medial margin feebly convex.

Epistome unarmed.

Mandible ( Fig. 2A View FIG ) moderately robust, without palp; molar process obliquely truncated distally, with blunt teeth and small groups of setae; incisor process truncated distally, with three acute distal teeth. Maxillula ( Fig. 2B View FIG ) with feebly bilobed palp, larger lower lobe slightly curved, with small ventral tubercle; upper lacinia slightly expanded, distal margin truncated, armed with five or six simple spines and numerous submarginal short setae; lower lacinia tapering, with numerous long setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 2C View FIG ) with simple palp slightly tapering distally; distal endite developed, deeply bilobed, upper lobe distally semi-quadrate, lower lobe slightly oblique distally, both lobes with distal setae; proximal endite obsolete; scaphognathite well developed, with marginal setae, anterior lobe broad, angular, posterior lobe short, slightly narrower than anterior lobe, medial margin convex. First maxilliped ( Fig. 2D View FIG ) with slender, elongate palp; distal endite with dense marginal setae and row of submarginal setae, proximal endite obsolete, with short marginal setae; exopod with well developed flagellum, caridean lobe well developed; epipod large, triangular, deeply bilobed. Second maxilliped ( Fig. 2E View FIG ) with normal endopod; dactylus moderately broad, medial margin straight; propodus with anteromedial margin bluntly produced; carpus short, anteromedially angulate; ischium and basis completely fused, obliquely articulated with merus, medial surface slightly concave; exopod with well developed flagellum; coxa inflated medially; epipod semi-quadrate, without podobranch. Third maxilliped ( Fig. 2F View FIG ) with endopod slender, slightly compressed, reaching level of distal third of scaphocerite; ultimate segment tapering distally, ventral surface with about seven transverse rows of long setae; penultimate segment longer than ultimate segment, ventrally with long setae, dorsally with sparse short setae, long simple setae dorsodistally; antepenultimate segment twisted proximally, distinctly demarcated from basis, ventral margin with sparse setae; exopod with well developed flagellum, distally with long setae; coxal plate oval; single well developed arthrobranch present.

First pereiopod ( Fig. 3A View FIG ) moderately slender, overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite by chela. Chela ( Fig. 3B View FIG ) with palm subcylindrical, slightly compressed, 1.2-1.3 times as long as dactylus, with four transverse rows of serrulate grooming setae proximally; dactylus and fixed finger tapering, each terminating in small hooked unguis, cutting edges situated laterally, unarmed. Carpus 1.0-1.4 times as long as chela, slightly widening distally, medially with subapical, longitudinal row of serrulate grooming setae, ventral setae long. Merus 1.1-1.2 times as long as carpus, unarmed. Basis with ventral setose carina. Coxa with large linguiform process ventrally.

Second pereiopods ( Fig. 3C View FIG ) well developed, robust, similar, overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite by lengths of carpus and chelae, ventral surfaces of palm, carpi, meri, and ischia usually with several short transverse rows of one to three spinules, bases of spinules forming squamous tubercles ( Fig. 3D View FIG ), dorsal surface of meri and ischia a few rows of spinules similar to ventral surface. Chela with palm subcylindrical, slightly compressed, 2.0-2.1 times as long as dactylus, entire dorsally, both fingers with numerous long setae; dactylus ( Fig. 3E View FIG ) terminating in small hooked unguis, distal three fourths of cutting edge unarmed, proximal fourth armed with single large semi-quadrate tooth; fixed finger ( Fig. 3E View FIG ) with distal cutting edge unarmed, proximal third armed with two large irregular teeth separated by diastema for dactylar tooth. Carpus short, robust, widening distally. Merus 2.0-2.6 times as long as carpus, distoventral lateral margin feebly angulate. Ischium slightly shorter than merus.

Third pereiopod ( Fig. 3F View FIG ) moderately robust, falling slightly short of, or slightly overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite; merus 2.3-2.4 times as long as carpus, unarmed; carpus unarmed, with well marked distolateral lobe; propodus 2.5-2.7 times as long as carpus, with two long distoventral and two subterminal spines, and spaced set of five or six spines on ventral surface, dorsal surface sparsely with short setae; dactylus ( Fig. 3G View FIG ) about 0.2 of propodal length, slightly sinuous, biunguiculate, unguis clearly demarcated. Fourth pereiopod similar to third, falling slightly short of, or slightly overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite. Fifth pereiopod overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite by length of dactylus, generally similar to anterior two pereiopods, but with serrulate grooming setae distally.

Endopod of male first pleopod ( Fig. 3H View FIG ) oblong, feebly widened distally, medial margin with blunt protuberance. Endopod of male second pleopod ( Fig. 3I View FIG ) with long, plumose seta on proximal third of medial margin; appendices interna and masculina arising at proximal two fifths of mesial margin, appendix interna stout, subequal to appendix masculina in length, distally with few cincinnuli, appendix masculina slender, with distalmost and distomesial long setae with setules.

Uropod ( Fig. 1D View FIG ) with protopodite posteroventrally acute; exopod broad, slightly overreaching posterior margin of telson, posterior margin subquadrate, feebly rounded, lateral margin almost straight, terminating in acute tooth, with smaller mobile spine just mesial to distolateral tooth; endopod oblong, feebly oval, slightly tapering distally, subequal to exopod in length.

Colour in life

Dorsal surface of carapace,abdominal somites, telson, and uropods white, submarginally with longitudinal yellowish bands. Carapace and abdominal somites laterally deep red. Rostrum, antennular peduncle, and scaphocerite white.Ground colour of pereiopods yellowish transparent, with red bands ( Fig. 4 View FIG ).

Hosts

Periclimenes dardanicola n. sp. has only been found associated with hermit crabs of the genus Dardanus . Individuals of P. dardanicola n. sp. previously observed at the Japanese diving sites are usually associated with the sea anemone Calliactis japonica , attached on gastropod shells occupied by Dardanus arrosor (see Minemizu 2000). The host hermit crab associated with the holotype of P.dardanicola n. sp., however, was identified with D. crassimanus . In the case of the Vietnamese specimens, some 50-70 diogenids were examined and P. dardanicola n. sp. was only found in association with Dardanus lagopodes (Marin pers. comm.). Debelius (1999) shows the shrimp in association with Dardanus pedunculatus (Herbst, 1804) .

REMARKS

Most of the specimens of P. dardanicola n. sp. show the presence of several short transverse rows of one to three spinules on the ventral surfaces of palm, carpi, meri, and ischia of the second pereiopod ( Fig. 3D View FIG ). Dorsal surfaces of meri and ischia also have the similar transverse rows, but the number of the rows is less than those on the dorsal surface. The bases of these spinules form the squamous tubercles. In one of the female paratypes ( QM W 27972), however, the transverse rows of spinules are obsolete. We regard this morphological gap as intraspecific variation related to growth.

As previously mentioned, P. dardanicola n. sp. is closely similar to P. parvus . Morphologically, the two share the carapace without supraorbital and epigastric spines, the rostrum shorter than the carapace, with single ventral tooth, the short and widened carpus of the second pereiopod, and the biunguiculate dactyli of the ambulatory pereiopods. Periclimenes dardanicola n. sp. is distinguished from P. parvus by the following features: 1) inferior orbital angle more produced ( Fig. 1C View FIG ); 2) pterygostomial angle not markedly produced ( Fig. 1C View FIG ); 3) hepatic spine more posteriorly situated ( Fig. 1C View FIG ); 4) first pereiopod with dactylus shorter than palm, and carpus subequal or slightly longer than chela ( Fig. 3A View FIG ); and 5) fingers of second pereiopod with numerous long setae, distinctly shorter than the palm ( Fig. 3C View FIG ).

From the habitat and characteristic colour pattern, the individuals reported as Periclimenes soror by Takeda (1986), P. imperator by Debelius (1999), and Pontoniinae sp. by Minemizu (2000), are all identifiable without hesitation with the present new species.

Ivan Marin (pers. comm.) has informed us that two further specimens were separately collected from the Vietnamese locality, one from a dardanid living in a gastropod shell ( Cassis sp. ) without an anemone, and another with an anemone. He also remarks that: “All the shrimps were sitting near shell mouth, possibly connecting with crabs. During collecting they attached to the shell more strongly and even hid deeper to the shell mouth. That [is] why I think they are not associated with anemone but with hermit-crab hosts”. The specimens are presently held in the collections of the Laboratory of Evolutional Morphology of Marine Invertebrates, Moscow.

Decapod-decapod associations do not seem to be common. The alpheid shrimp, Aretopsis amabilis De Man, 1910 , is only known as an associate of Dardanus hermit crabs ( Bruce 1969; Kamezaki & Kamezaki 1986). Similar behaviour to that of P. dardanicola n. sp. has been documented by Bruce (1989) for P. poupini Bruce, 1989 , which associates with a sea anemone carried by the hermit crab Trizopagurus sp. in deep waters of French Polynesia (see Bruce 1989).

Periclimenes parvus Borradaile, 1898 ( Fig. 5 View FIG )

Periclimenes parvus Borradaile, 1898: 384 View in CoL ; 1899: 407, pl. 36, fig. 3a-c. — Bruce 1977: 3 (in part); 2003: 239 (in part). — Chace & Bruce 1993: 59 (list). — Li 2000: 221 (in part).

Periclimenes (Cristiger) parvus View in CoL – Borradaile 1917: 363.

Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus View in CoL – Kemp 1922: 149.

? Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus View in CoL – Johnson 1962: 58 (see Remarks).

? Periclimenes parvus View in CoL – Johnson 1976: 33 (list) (see Remarks).

MATERIAL EXAMINED. — New Britain. Rakaiya, Blanche Bay, 1.III.1898, coll. A. Willey, 2 syntypes 1.9 mm CL ( UMZC unnumbered).

DISTRIBUTION. — Known only from the type locality, viz., Rakaiya, Blanche Bay, New Britain, Papua New Guinea ( Borradaile 1898).

REMARKS

The syntypes of P. parvus have the following morphological features: the rostrum is not particularly deep, with a feebly developed ventral carina, arched, with six or seven acute dorsal teeth, all anterior to the postorbital margin; the inferior orbital angle is produced but blunt ( Fig. 5A View FIG ). The carapace appears deeper anteriorly than posteriorly, with the

A new species of Periclimenes from the western Pacific pterygostomial angle produced and the hepatic spine at level of posterior margin of orbit ( Fig. 5A View FIG ). The fourth thoracic sternite is without a median process but bears a low transverse ridge without a median notch posteriorly. The first pereiopod has the fingers of the chela feebly subspatulate, with lateral cutting edges, subequal to the palm length, the carpus distinctly shorter than the chela, about 1.5 times as long as palm, 3.5 times as long as the distal width ( Fig. 5B View FIG ); the coxa bears a large medial process. The chela of the second pereiopod is slightly shorter than the carapace length, with the palm about 2.6 times longer than deep, with the fingers about 0.75 of the palm length ( Fig. 5D View FIG ); the fingers are also sparsely setose, without the numerous long setae ( Fig. 5D View FIG ); the palm, merus and ischium are smooth, and without the remarkable numerous small squamous tubercles and transverse rows with short setae ( Fig. 5C View FIG ). The ambulatory dactylus is about 0.28 of the length of propodus ( Fig. 5E View FIG ).

One specimen is largely disarticulated, with the carapace still attached to the abdomen, but the thoracic sternites are detached, and all the appendages separated. The abdomen is also broken between the fourth and fifth somites. The second specimen is more intact but is considerably distorted, with the left first, third and fourth pereiopods still attached. Two first pereiopods, two major second pereiopods and four detached ambulatory pereiopods are also preserved.

Johnson (1962, 1976) reported the occurrence of P. parvus in Singapore waters on the basis of a single specimen in the Bedford-Lanchester collection, Natural History Museum, but it is no longer extant. No further specimens have since been collected in Singapore waters (Yang Chang Man pers. comm.), and Johnson’s identification must be considered doubtful.

Dedication

Caridean shrimps are rarely associated with hermit crabs, thus, we think that our paper is suitable to be included in a publication in honor of Dr Patsy A. McLaughlin, who is the doyen of hermit crab taxonomy, and who has contributed greatly to the knowledge of their diversity.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

QM

Queensland Museum

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

ZMA

Universiteit van Amsterdam, Zoologisch Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Palaemonidae

Genus

Periclimenes

Loc

Periclimenes dardanicola

Bruce, Alexander J. & Okuno, Junji 2006
2006
Loc

Pontoniinae

MINEMIZU R. 2000: 58
2000
Loc

Periclimenes imperator

DEBELIUS H. 1999: 235
1999
Loc

Periclimenes soror

TAKEDA M. 1986: 116
1986
Loc

Periclimenes parvus

BRUCE A. J. 2003: 239
LI X. 2000: 221
BRUCE A. J. 1977: 3
1977
Loc

Periclimenes parvus

JOHNSON D. S. 1976: 33
1976
Loc

Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus

JOHNSON D. S. 1962: 58
1962
Loc

Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus

HOLTHUIS L. B. 1952: 40
1952
Loc

Periclimenes (Periclimenes) parvus

KEMP S. 1922: 149
1922
Loc

Periclimenes (Cristiger) parvus

BORRADAILE L. A. 1917: 363
1917
Loc

Periclimenes parvus

LI X. 2000: 221
CHACE F. A. JR. & BRUCE A. J. 1993: 59
BRUCE A. J. 1977: 3
BORRADAILE L. A. 1899: 407
BORRADAILE L. A. 1898: 384
1898
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF