Diptilomiopidae, Keifer Nalepa

Khan, Eid Muhammad, Kamran, Muhammad & Alatawi, Fahad Jaber, 2023, A new species of the genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa and a key to diptilomiopid species (Prostigmata; Eriophyoidea; Diptilomiopidae) associated with Moraceae plant family, Zootaxa 5375 (1), pp. 93-102 : 99-100

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:55AA33AF-56BE-4EA9-8383-EEA56D4B902B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10248386

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B93DD90E-FFA0-FFF3-FF70-FC73B99AFD00

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Diptilomiopidae
status

 

Key to species of the family Diptilomiopidae View in CoL View at ENA associated with the plant family Moraceae

1. Empodium entire................................... Subfamily Rhyncaphytoptinae ......................... 2

- Empodium deeply divided........................ Subfamily Diptilomiopinae .............................. 12

2. Coxae setae 1b absent................................. Genus Chakrabartiella C. ficusis (Chakrabarti, Ghosh & Das)

- Coxae setae 1b present................................................................................. 3

3. Femoral setae absent from leg I......................... Genus Catarhinus ....................... C. mori Huang

- Femoral setae present on both legs........................................................................ 4

4. Dorsal annuli uneven, laterally irregular serrate......................... Genus Quadracus ....... Q. cudraniae Kaung

- Dorsal annuli uniformly even, laterally not serrate........................................................... 5

5. Prodorsal shield separated from 1 st dorsal annulus by deep cleft, lateral annular margin with strong pointed projection......................... Genus Peralox .............................................. P. cudraniae Kuang and Hong

- Prodorsal shield not separated from 1 st dorsal annulus; lateral annular margin not as above........................... 6

6. Dorsal annuli subequal dorsoventrally......................... Genus Rhinophytoptus ....... R. broussonetiae Kaung

- Dorsal annuli broader than ventral annuli......................... Genus Rhyncaphytoptus ...................... 7

7. Median, admedian and submedian lines incomplete............................................ R. ficifoliae Keifer

- Median, admedian and submedian lines complete............................................................ 8

8. Median and admedian are connected by transverse lines....................................................... 9

- Median and admedian are without transverse lines.......................................................... 10

9. Two transverse lines joining median and admedian lines............................... R. zhongshani Zhao & Kaung

- Single transverse line joining median and admedian lines................................ R. taihangensis Xue & Hong

10. Coxal areas without granules, annuli with spines like micortubercles......................... R. caricae Zhao & Kuang

- Coxal areas with granules, annuli with rounded micortubercles or absent........................................ 11

11. Dorsal annul without micortubercles, h 1 present............................................ R. mori Liu & Kuang

- Dorsal annuli with rounded micortubercles, h 1 absent.................................... R. papyriferae Xue & Hong

12. Scapular setae present; minute in size.................................................................... 13

- Scapular setae absent................................................................................. 14

13. Genu setae absent from leg II......................... Genus Neorhynacus ....... N. lakoochii Pandir & Chakrabarti

- Genu setae present on both legs......................... Genus Apodiptacus ................. A. cordiformis Keifer

14. Legs genu segment absent......................... Genus Diptilomiopus ................................... 15

- Legs genu segment present............................................................................ 27

15. Scapular setal insertion absent.......................................................................... 16

- Scapular setal insertion present......................................................................... 18

16. Female coverflap with longitudinal lines; central cell with admedian lines.............. D. ficusis Chakrabarti & Mondal

- Female coverflap smooth; central cell without median and admedian lines....................................... 17

17. Female genital area anteriorly granulated; second medial row with 13 cells............... D. indicus Chakrabarti & Pandit

- Female genital area anteriorly smooth; second medial row with 7 cells.................. D. ficifolius (Boczek & Oleczek)

18. Central cell with median lines.......................................................................... 19 - Central cell without median lines........................................................................ 21

19. Each branch of empodium multi-rayed......................................... D. broussonetus Liu, Yuan, & Xue

- Each branch of empodium 5-6 rayed..................................................................... 20

20. Leg tarsal seta (ft’, ft’’) divided................................................... D. sabahus Liu, Yuan, & Xue

- Leg tarsal seta (ft’, ft’’) simple............................................................ D. ficivorus Sarkar

21. Coxal area smooth................................................................................... 22

- Coxal area granulated/punctate......................................................................... 23

22. Second row of mid shield with 5 cells; genital area with few granules.............................. D. cumingis Huang

- Second row of mid shield with 3 cells; genital area entirely smooth...................... D. asperis Gosh & Chakrabarti

23. Genital shield entirely smooth........................................... D. benjaminae (Boczek & Chandrapatya)

- Genital shield granulated.............................................................................. 24

24. Dorsal annulai smooth................................................................................ 25

- Dorsal annulai with pointed micortubercles................................................................ 26

25. Only coxae I granulated,................................................ D. racemosae (Chandrapatya & Boczek)

- Both coxae granulated................................................... D. bahaensis sp. nov. Alatawi & Khan

26. Setae h 1 absent; empodium 6 rayed................................... D. indogangeticus Chakrabarti, Sur, & Sarkar

- Setae h 1 present; empodium 8 rayed............................................................ D. ficus Attiah

27. All coxal setae present......................... Genus Asetadiptacus ........................ A. emiliae Carmona

- Coxal setae 1b absent......................... Genus Vimola .................... V. artocarpae (Mohanasundaram)

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF