Hymenoptera

Baumann, Julia, 2018, Tiny mites on a great journey - a review on scutacarid mites as phoronts and inquilines (Heterostigmatina, Pygmephoroidea, Scutacaridae), Acarologia 58 (1), pp. 192-251 : 208-209

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20184238

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B0E18B48-D388-4E7E-89FC-08224D78E42B

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BA54A568-FF83-FFB1-AFB7-FEC2BD23C4AF

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Hymenoptera
status

 

Hymenoptera View in CoL View at ENA : ants

The majority of scutacarid mites living in associations with other animals can be found with another family of Vespoidea, the Formicidae , or ants (214 spp.). Most associated scutacarids belong to the genera Scutacarus and Imparipes ( Figures 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12 ; Annex V-VII). A great variety of different mite taxa can be found as guests of ants (e.g. Vitzthum 1919, Campbell et al. 2013), and it is also common to encounter more than one scutacarid species within one single ant nest (e.g. Friedl 2000). Scutacarids are either phoretic on the ants or they live in ant nests, or both. Inside the ants’ nests, nest debris and (in army ants) temporary provisions are available ( Okabe 2013), both of which can become moldy and then serve as food sources for scutacarids. On the ants, scutacarids can be found on the thorax, between the coxae, but also on rather exposed parts like the ant’s legs or on the head (e.g. Paoli 1911, Rettenmeyer 1961a, Ebermann 1982, Elbadry et al. 1976).

From not further determined “ants”, 51 scutacarid species have been reported: Archidispus haarloevi ( Karafiat, 1959) , 13 Imparipes species , Pygmodispus calcaratus Paoli, 1911 and

36 Scutacarus species (e.g. Karafiat 1959, Mahunka 1981, 1986, Dobrev 1992; for other references see Annex V). For all other reports of associations between ants and Scutacaridae View in CoL , at the least the subfamily of the host was given. Most scutacarid species occur together with Formicinae and Myrmicinae View in CoL ( Figure 12 View Figure 12 ; Annex VI, VII).

In the subfamily Formicinae , Archidispus intermissus ( Karafiat, 1959) , 28 Imparipes species , 2 Lophodispus species , 58 Scutacarus species and Thaumatopelvis reticulatus are present as associates (e.g. Karafiat 1959, Mahunka 1972b, 1977c, Khaustov 2008, Ebermann and Krisper 2014; for other references see Annex VI). The scutacarids could be detected in 5 ant genera, and the majority of all mite species (52 species) was present in the genus Lasius View in CoL . Ants of this genus can occur in high population densities (e.g. L. alienus View in CoL or L. niger View in CoL ), they frequently are social parasites of other ants and often feed through trophobiosis in symbiosis with aphids ( Seifert 1996). Scutacarids can also often be found in associations with zoophagous Formica View in CoL ants, further with the genera Camponotus View in CoL and Paratrechina View in CoL . There are even species associated with desert ants of the genus Cataglyphus, which are highly thermophilic scavengers feeding mostly on dead arthropods ( Lenoir et al. 2009).

Thirty-four Imparipes species , Lophodispus irregularis and 38 Scutacarus species have been reported from the subfamily Myrmicinae View in CoL (e.g. Ebermann 1979, 1980a, b, Khaustov 2008, Ebermann and Krisper 2014; for other references see Annex VII). The mites have been found in association with ants belonging to 10 genera, and the largest number of mites (25 species) was present in the genus Myrmica View in CoL . The genera accepted as hosts are characterized by different life styles, ranging from harvester ants feeding on seeds (e.g. Messor View in CoL ) to zoophagous (e.g. Myrmica View in CoL ) and omnivorous ants (e.g. Solenopsis View in CoL ). The colony sizes of the hosts also vary, ranging from 40- 120 workers in Stenamma View in CoL to some thousand workers in Aphenogaster ( Seifert 1996).

Scutacarids can also be associated with army ants of the subfamily Dorylinae (following the taxonomic classifaction by Brady et al. 2014). These ants are carnivorous, they raid for food in large groups, build extremely large colonies and the whole colonies emigrate periodically ( Rettenmeyer et al. 2011, Okabe 2013). Colonies of Dorylinae are home to several animals belonging to a variety of taxa, but their most abundant guests are mites ( Gotwald 1996, Rettenmeyer et al. 2011). Accordingly, Dorylinae also serve as hosts for scutacarids: 39 scutacarid species belonging to seven genera have been reported from five army ant genera (Annex V). The respective mites are 4 Archidispus species , 24 Imparipes species , Pygmodispus dorylini Mahunka, 1977 , Rettenmeyerella petropolitana solenifera Mahunka, 1977 , 2 Scutacaropsis species , 5 Scutacarus species and 2 Thaumatopelvis species ( Rettenmeyer 1961a, Mahunka 1977a,b, Ebermann 1980b, Berghoff and Franks 2007, Berghoff et al. 2009, Rettenmeyer et al. 2011). Within ants, Dorylinae display the highest diversity of scutacarids on genus level.

Six scutacarid species (3 Imparipes , Lophodispus tapinoma Sobhi & Hajiqanbar, 2017 and 2 Scutacarus ) were found in association with ants of the subfamily Dolichoderinae , either with members of the genus Tapinoma or with members of Liometopum ( Mahunka 1977c, 1982, Khaustov 2008; Annex V). Tapinoma ants are omnivorous and not sedentary, instead they often change the location of their nests, while Liometopum ants are sedentary, associated with trees and shrubs and they can also be minor pests in housing areas ( Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013). Only one scutacarid, Imparipes malus Khaustov, 2008 , has been reported from Ponera coarctata of the subfamily Ponerinae ( Khaustov 2008; Annex V). The concealed life style of this thermophile ant species makes it difficult to sample ( Seifert 1996, Wagner 2014), so intensified collections may reveal a higher number of associated scutacarids.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Loc

Hymenoptera

Baumann, Julia 2018
2018
Loc

Thaumatopelvis reticulatus

Ebermann 1980
1980
Loc

Rettenmeyerella

Mahunka 1977
1977
Loc

Pygmodispus dorylini

Mahunka 1977
1977
Loc

Rettenmeyerella petropolitana solenifera

Mahunka 1977
1977
Loc

Parascutacarus

Baker & Delfinado 1975
1975
Loc

Thaumatopelvis

Mahunka 1973
1973
Loc

Lophodispus

Kurosa 1972
1972
Loc

Reductacarus

Mahunka 1963
1963
Loc

Nasutiscutacarus

Beer & Cross 1960
1960
Loc

Messor

Forel 1890
1890
Loc

Paratrechina

Motschoulsky 1863
1863
Loc

Camponotus

Mayr 1861
1861
Loc

Solenopsis

Westwood 1840
1840
Loc

Stenamma

Westwood 1839
1839
Loc

Myrmicinae

Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau 1835
1835
Loc

Myrmicinae

Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau 1835
1835
Loc

Dorylinae

Leach 1815
1815
Loc

Dorylinae

Leach 1815
1815
Loc

Dorylinae

Leach 1815
1815
Loc

Dorylinae

Leach 1815
1815
Loc

Lasius

Fabricius 1804
1804
Loc

Myrmica

Latreille 1804
1804
Loc

Myrmica

Latreille 1804
1804
Loc

Formica

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF