Armillipora nawak, Jaume-Schinkel, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/evolsyst.8.124213 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8FFA1CD5-BAD6-455E-AF56-C13A25262059 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12186460 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BBEA1DBA-DC8E-549F-805D-C43A81F0CBA7 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Armillipora nawak |
status |
sp. nov. |
Armillipora nawak sp. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5
Differential diagnosis.
Armillipora nawak sp. nov. belongs to the suapiensis group (gonostyli not fused). It can be easily differentiated from all the species in the group by the digitiform gonostyli with rounded apex (apex of gonostyli bifurcated in A. bifida sp. nov., and apex of gonostyli pointed and sickle-shaped in A. suapiensis ); the gonostyli are as long as the aedeagus (shorter than the aedeagus in A. bifida sp. nov., and A. suapiensis ); the apex of the aedeagus with two digitiform sclerotized structures (apex of the aedeagus pointed without sclerotized structures in A. bifida sp. nov., and in A. suapiensis ).
Etymology.
The species epithet nawak derives from the Cabécar word: “ ña ̱ ́ wák ”, commonly used to refer to synanthropic psychodines. To be treated as a name in apposition.
Examined material.
Costa Rica – San Jose Moravia • 1 ♂; Zurqui de Moravia; - 10.0492 ° N, - 84.0037 ° W; alt. 1600 masl; 22 Oct. – 01 Nov. 2012; ZABDI project leg.; Malaise Trap ZABDI- 186 ; LACM [ INB 0004346462 - INBIOCRI] GoogleMaps . Paratype. Costa Rica – Punteras • 1 ♂; Coto Brus, Las Tablas, Estacion Biologica Las Alturas ; - 8.9519 ° N, - 82.8322 ° W; 1500 masl; 01 Jan. – 07 Jan. 2013; ZABDI project leg.; Malaise Trap ZABDI- 544 ; LACM [ INB 0004415321 ] GoogleMaps .
Description.
(N = 2). Wing length: 3.02, width: 1.09. Head length: 0.50, width: 0.60. Antennal segments: scape: 0.12); pedicel: 0.07; flagellomeres 1–4 0.17, flagellomeres 5–14 missing in examined material. Palpal segment 1: 0.10, palpal segments 2–4 missing in examined material.
Male. Head (Fig. 4 A View Figure 4 ). About 1.20 times wider than its length; eye bridge separated by about half facet’s diameter, with four rows of facets; interocular suture absent; the frontal patch of alveoli is divided. Antennal scape almost cylindrical, about 1.66 times the length of the spherical pedicel; flagellomeres fusiform and longer than the scape, with scattered alveoli in the surface; each flagellomere with two rows of alveoli; flagellomeres after the fourth absent in examined material; ascoids undistinguishable in examined material. First palpal segment cylindrical; labium without any strong sclerites; labella elongated and teardrop-shaped, with 5–6 scattered setae on the surface and with one apical spiniform tooth on each.
Thorax (Fig. 4 B View Figure 4 ). It does not present allurement organs, with a single patch of alveoli in the paraterguite and antepronotum; all coxae with a stripe of one to two rows of alveoli. Wing (Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 ) length about three times its width; wing membrane hyaline, with darkened spots in the apex of longitudinal veins (as seen in Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 ); Sc vein short ending at the origin of R 1; radial fork basal to medial fork; R 2 + 3 not joining R 4; R 5 ending at the wing apex; CuA ending at wing margin.
Terminalia (Figs 4 D – E View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 ). Hypandrium on ventral view band-like, sclerotized and joining the base of the reduced gonocoxites; gonostyli not fused with gonocoxites and clearly divergent, digitiform with a rounded apex (as in Fig. 4 D – E View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 ), each gonostylus with two apical and one subapical alveoli; aedeagus on ventral view straight, basal 2 / 3 rds looking like a single shaft, while apical third as two distinct heavily sclerotized digitiform structures, the aedeagus ends beyond the apex of the gonostyli; ejaculatory apodeme slightly shorter than the aedeagus, broader on the base, and tapering towards its apex, in ventral view the basal margin is rounded, and the width of the basal margin is the same as the length of the ejaculatory apodeme; parameral sclerites seem absent; gonocoxal apodemes (Figs 4 D View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 ) fitting in a concavity on the underside of the ejaculatory apodeme, and joining the reduced gonocoxites; epandrium rectangular (Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ), about 3 times wider than its length; hypoproct tongue-shaped and covered in setulae, epiproct not observed; epandrial appendages (Figs 4 D – E View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 ) barely hemispherical, prolonged and tapering distally, covered with setae; epandrial appendages with one preapical, tip-folded and short tenacula (Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ) with a basal darkened patch of accessory tenacula, the accessory tenacula varies in length, from shorter to longer than the epandrial appendages (Figs 4 D View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 ).
Female. Unknown.
Distribution.
The species is only known from the type locality in Costa Rica (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
LACM |
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Psychodomorpha |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Psychodinae |
Genus |