Afrotroppopsis risbeci Gumovsky, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3957.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CE91AF19-958E-4659-84AA-ADD90DC9F1CF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5662146 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BD5E87B5-9A6B-280F-FF6D-DD80FCA3C12D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Afrotroppopsis risbeci Gumovsky, 2007 |
status |
|
Afrotroppopsis risbeci Gumovsky, 2007
Described from three females ( Gumovsky 2007). Here below we present the description of the male.
Material examined. Democratic Republic of Congo: 1♀, P.N.A., 22.x.1952, Ac. No. 1361-62, Massif Ruwenzori, Kyandolire, 1700 m, Camp des Gardes, leg. P. Vanschuytbroeck & J. Kekenbosch, in RMCA. Kenya: 3♂, 8♀, Arabuko Sokoke, Mixed forest, 50 m, 05.iv.2001, ex Cremaspora trifolia (Rubiaceae) , 21.iv.2001, host Caloptilia mwamba sp. nov. ( Gracillariidae ), 03°17'S 39°58'E (E8), leg. J. & W. De Prins, in RMCA. GoogleMaps Zambia: 1♀, South Luangwa, ~ 20 km W Mfuwe, riverbank between the “Crock Valley” and “Thorneycroft” camps, 19.xii.2011, leg. A. Gumovsky, in SIZK.
Description. Female, Figs. 27–29 View FIGURES 27 – 32 , 33–38 View FIGURES 33 – 38 . Full description see: Gumovsky 2007. Also: antennae with symmetrical and short ampulliform sensilla; semicircular carina below the shoulder at lateral panel of pronotum ends with a series of small orifices ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 33 – 38 ). Fore wing WIP (Wing Interference Pattern) with a broad blue field along costal margin in Kenyan specimens and paratypes (from RSA, Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 58 ); with narrower blue field in the holotype (larger female from Senegal).
Male. Length 1.8–2.4 mm. Body metallic dark blue-green (smaller specimens, 1.8, 2.2 mm, Figs. 31, 32 View FIGURES 27 – 32 ) or nearly black with weak green tint (larger specimen, 2.4 mm, Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27 – 32 ), except for tibiae and tarsi (but not pretarsi) and base to middle of scape (with dark margins of the scape). Wings transparent with venation pale brown ( Figs. 30–32 View FIGURES 27 – 32 ).
Head dorsally about 2.5× (small specimens, Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39 – 42 )–2.65× (large specimens) as broad as long. Head coarsely reticulate; fronto-vertex with smoother areas at extreme end of occipital margin. Occipital margin sharp ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39 – 42 ), with short elevation at each side near place of contact with compound eye ( Figs. 40 View FIGURES 39 – 42 , 46, 48 View FIGURES 43 – 48 ), the latter densely pubescent ( Figs. 40 View FIGURES 39 – 42 , 48 View FIGURES 43 – 48 ). Frontofacial sulcus missing (as for the genus), but may be traced by changes in sculpture: the face coarsely reticulate above the virtual transverse line reachable by upper end of antennal scape, and slightly reticulate all below, up to tentorial pits. Clypeus slightly but notably produced, mouth opening about 1.7× as long as malar space. Mandible bidentate, with two equal-sized teeth and minute dentation at inner surface of the upper tooth. Antenna ( Figs. 46 View FIGURES 43 – 48 , 51 View FIGURES 49 – 54 ) with widened scape, drop-shaped pedicel, 3 anelli ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 54 ), 3-segmented funicle and 2-segmented club. Scape about 3× as long as broad, with ventral part flattened and bearing a ventral sensorial area along entire scape. Pedicel slightly longer than broad. Anelli with indentations at their posterior edges ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 54 ). Funicle with long peduncles: F1 4.0–4.5×–3.7× as long as broad, and at least 2– 3 x as long as pedicel, F2 about 3– 4× as long as broad, slightly shorter than F1, F3 about 3–4× as long as broad, and about 1.0–1.3× as long as F2. Club about 5–7× as long as broad; its 1st segment about 3–4.5× longer than 2nd. Spicula just slightly shorter than 2nd segment of club, about 0.1× of the length of entire club. Mesosoma about 1.6–1.8× as long as broad. Pronotum and mesoscutum with characteristic “lateral shoulders”. Lateral panel of pronotum with series of minute orifices and a semicircular carina (as for the genus, Fig. 47 View FIGURES 43 – 48 , arrowed). Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum densely reticulate. Mesoscutum 1.5–1.8× as broad as long; mesoscutellum slightly longer than broad, as long as mesoscutum, with raised or nearly straight median part of anterior margin. Mesopleuron with all lines traceable as grooves ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 49 – 54 ). Propodeum similar to the propodeum of female: with median smooth stripe delimited by somewhat posteriorly divergent carinae and bordered anteriorly by a groove subdivided by short transverse setae (smaller specimens, Figs. 39–41 View FIGURES 39 – 42 ), or the median stripe is diverged anteriorly and surface reticulated (larger specimens, Fig. 42 View FIGURES 39 – 42 ). Spiracular openings in the shape of elongate orifices ( Figs. 39, 41, 42 View FIGURES 39 – 42 ).
Fore wing 2.2–2.5× as long as broad, venation similar to female. WIP similar to females: with wide (small specimens, Figs. 57, 58 View FIGURES 55 – 58 ) or narrower (larger specimens, Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55 – 58 ) blue field along anterior wing margin.
Metasoma about as long as or slightly shorter than head plus mesosoma, about 1.8–2.3× as long as broad. Petiole spherical, 1.2–1.9× as broad as long, with protruding lateral flanges bearing one short spine at each side ( Figs. 39, 41, 42 View FIGURES 39 – 42 ).
Host. Caloptilia mwamba sp. nov. ( Gracillariidae ) (new record). Earlier it was recorded from unidentified leaf miners from Senegal mahogany, Khaya senegalensis (Desv.) A. Juss. [ Meliaceae ] in Senegal, and Ochna pulchra Hook. [ Ochnaceae ] in South Africa ( Gumovsky 2007: 7).
Distribution. Democratic Republic of Congo (new record), Kenya (new record), Senegal ( Gumovsky 2007: 7), South Africa ( Gumovsky 2007: 7), Zambia (new record).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |