Harpedona Distant, 1904

Yeshwanth, H. M. & Konstantinov, Fedor V., 2021, Review of the plant bug tribe Eccritotarsini (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) of India and Sri Lanka with description of two new genera and six new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 745, pp. 1-69 : 9-10

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.745.1311
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C85E664-6DE6-442A-9410-D94254E429F5
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4695073
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BE301C0D-F86C-FF82-FD09-8CE47438FB7D
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Harpedona Distant, 1904
status

Treatment

Harpedona Distant, 1904 View in CoL View at ENA

Figs 2C–D View Fig , 5J–M View Fig , 14–16 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 25A View Fig , 27A–B View Fig

Harpedona Distant, 1904b: 418 View in CoL .

Harpedona View in CoL – Stonedahl 1988: 16–32 (revision).

Type species

Harpedona marginata Distant, 1904 View in CoL (by monotypy; Distant 1904b).

Diagnosis

Recognized by the following combination of characters: body narrow, parallel-sided, pronotum at base less than 1.5× as wide as head ( Figs 2C–D View Fig , 5J–M View Fig ); coloration of dorsum uniform, dirty yellow to black, sometimes with paler embolium, legs contrastingly whitish or reddish yellow, comparatively long and slender, apex of hind femur reaching or surpassing apex of abdomen; dorsum clothed with dense, short, adpressed, silvery simple setae; pronotal collar wide and large; calli medially confluent, dorsally and laterally separated by deep impressed lines giving appearance of three distinct sections of pronotum; genital capsule highly modified, with large, lobate process on right margin, and usually with bulbous, twisted and spinelike outgrowths on dorsal margin ( Figs 14A–C View Fig , 15A–B View Fig , 16A View Fig ); parameres and aedeagus reduced, very small; left paramere with long and thin, twisted apical process ( Figs 14D–E View Fig , 15C–D View Fig , 16B–C View Fig ); right paramere simple, with tapering incurved apex ( Figs 14F View Fig , 15E–F View Fig , 16D–E View Fig ); aedeagus with entirely membranous phallotheca, simple membranous endosoma and sclerotized, spine-like apical part of ductus seminis ( Figs 14G View Fig , 15G–H View Fig , 16F View Fig ).

Distribution

Known from Sri Lanka, southwestern and northern India to Fukien Prov. of China, Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands ( Stonedahl 1988).

Remarks

This genus was revised by Stonedahl (1988) and, with addition of the recently described Harpedona stonedahli Yasunaga & Ishikawa, 2016 , it currently comprises 13 species. Only Harpedona sanguinipes Distant, 1909 was known from India prior to our study; the description of a new species from the Karnataka state of India is given below. Harpedona marginata Distant, 1904 , the most frequently collected and widely distributed species of the genus was originally described from Sri Lanka and may likely be found in India with more sampling effort.

Key to species of the genus Harpedona of India and Sri Lanka

1. Pronotum dirty orange, with distinct punctures ( Fig. 2D View Fig ) ................................ H. vittlaensis sp. nov.

– Pronotum dark brown, smooth or very faintly punctate ( Figs 2C View Fig , 5J, L View Fig ) ......................................... 2

2. Frons in males with a distinct longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 5J View Fig ). Labium at most reaching mesocoxa. Femora pale yellow. Phallotheca with a large sclerotized sac ( Fig. 14G View Fig ) .......................................... ................................................................................................................. H. marginata Distant, 1904 View in CoL

– Frons without sulcus. Labium surpassing metacoxae. Femora with a distinct reddish tinge ( Fig. 2C View Fig ). Phallotheca membranous, without a sclerotized sac ( Fig. 15G–H View Fig ) ..... H. sanguinipes Distant, 1909 View in CoL