Ginglymodesmus, Mesibov, Robert, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170198 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6264589 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BE3E427E-D544-2111-0913-9C16FD98FE47 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ginglymodesmus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Ginglymodesmus View in CoL n. gen.
Type species: Ginglymodesmus tasmanianus n. sp.
Diagnosis: Small (56 mm long) dalodesmids with a head + 19 segments; high, smooth paranota with rounded corners; reduced tergites 2, 3 and 4; no lateral pit on the underside of segment 2; long, slender gonopod telopodites reaching legpair 3 when retracted, in two sections more or less equal in length, the distal section pivoting around a hingelike structure.
Etymology: Greek ginglymos (“hinge”) + desmus (commonly used combining form for Polydesmida ), for the hingelike structure on the gonopod telopodite; masculine.
Remarks: I am currently unable to identify females of any of the Ginglymodesmus species, which cooccur with very similar dalodesmids in other genera.
Like dalodesmids in at least four other Tasmanian genera ( Mesibov 1997, 2003a, 2003b, 2004), the three known species of Ginglymodesmus seem to have a tightly fitted mosaic distribution ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ), with G. penelopae and G. tasmanianus recorded from sites only 10 km apart near the town of Waratah. Documenting the mosaic in detail would be difficult. Ginglymodesmus are very hard to find in the field and may be naturally uncommon. The arclike shape of the G. tasmanianus distribution ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ) is possibly a collecting artifact, as the species may occur further south in the relatively littlesampled central western districts.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |