Megachile (Maximegachile) maxillosa

Gess, Sarah Kathleen & Roosenschoon, Peter Alexander, 2017, Notes on the nesting of three species of Megachilinae in the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve, UAE, Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54, pp. 43-56 : 44-47

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.11290

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B68BE62E-69C4-40D9-87BE-27D604E6DD61

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BE7F8CD9-BE70-6C37-63E9-63673C6D329B

treatment provided by

Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft

scientific name

Megachile (Maximegachile) maxillosa
status

 

Megachile (Maximegachile) maxillosa

Taxonomy.

In their phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Megachilini Trunz et al. (2016) found that the subgenus Maximegachilae with the subgenus Neglectella formed a monophyletic group representing an isolated lineage.

Distribution.

Senegal, Namibia, Botswana, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and the DDCR ( Gess and Roosenschoon 2016).

Flower visiting.

There are no records for flower visiting by Megachile maxillosa in the DDCR ( Gess and Roosenschoon 2016) nor as far as could be established are there any flower visiting records for this bee from elsewhere in the UAE. However, it has been commonly collected visiting flowers in the semi-arid to arid areas of South Africa and Namibia ( Gess and Gess 2003) where it was collected from flowers of Acanthaceae, Apocynaceae ( Asclepiadoideae), Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae ( Caesalpinoideae, Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae), Pedaliaceae and Polygalaceae, although in Namibia it was most commonly visiting Papilionoideae, most notably species of Crotalaria . No distinction was made between pollen collection and nectar uptake. Though clearly polyphagous, a preference for Fabaceae is suggested, possibly indicating some degree of specialization.

Nesting.

The only published mention of the nesting of the subgenus Maximegachile appears to be a comment by Kronenberg and Hefetz (1984, page 178) stating that " Megachile maxillosa nests in canes apparently without any further lining".

Four nests of Megachile maxillosa were constructed in trap-nests. Two of these trap-nests, both of 12.7 mm bore were part of the bundle suspended from the branch of the Calotropis procera tree at Tawi Ruwayyan and two of 9.5 mm bore were part of the bundle attached near the base of a date palm at the Camel Farm.

The walls of the cells, the cell closures and the nest closure were constructed from a mixture of sand and resin. The average length of the cells is 26.4 mm (sample of 12 cells). In three of the nests the first cell was initiated in contact with the inner end of the boring and in the fourth, one of the two from the Camel Farm, the first cell was initiated 25 mm from the inner end beyond a nest of Pseudoheriades grandiceps (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 , trap-nest 3).

In completed nests the opening of the boring had been sealed with a 3 mm thick plug of sand and resin in consistency similar to that of the cell walls and closures. The empty space, the vestibular cell, between the last cell and the closure varied from 12 to 40 mm. In one of the nests the vestibular cell had been divided into two and in another three compartments (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 , trap-nests 3 and 1).

Nesting progress. At Tawi Ruwayyan on 23 April a female Megachile maxillosa was provisioning a newly constructed cell in one of the trap-nests (trap-nest 1). By 27 April this nest consisted of two completed and sealed provisioned cells. After the second cell had been completed a leaf-cutting megachilid had usurped the nest (Fig. 9 View Figures 8–15 ) and Megachile maxillosa had initiated cell construction in the neighbouring trap-nest (trap-nest 2) (Fig. 8 View Figures 8–15 ). By the following day the walls of this cell had been completed and provisioning was in progress (Fig. 10 View Figures 8–15 ). When taken in later during May the nest in trap-nest 2 had four completed cells and that in trap-nest 1 three completed cells, a large sub-divided vestibular cell and an outer seal, indicating that the usurper had been ousted (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 , trap nest 1).

At the Camel Farm on 23 April Megachile maxillosa was provisioning a cell in trap-nest 4 (Fig. 11 View Figures 8–15 ). By 28 April she had constructed, provisioned and sealed two cells and was busy constructing a third cell (Fig. 12 View Figures 8–15 ). When inspected on 30 April there were 4 cells, all provisioned and closed. During May Megachile maxillosa had constructed, provisioned and sealed three cells in the neighbouring trap-nest 3 beyond a nest of Pseudoheriades grandiceps (Fig. 13 View Figures 8–15 ). An empty vestibular cell had then been constructed subdividing the vestibular area between the last cell and the opening of the trap-nest, which had been sealed (Fig. 14 View Figures 8–15 ).

When PAR inspected the nests in early April 2016 no imagines had emerged but by 11 May five females and four males had emerged (Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 15 View Figures 8–15 ).

Provision. The provision was a bright yellow, moist mixture of pollen and nectar (Figs 9-12 View Figures 8–15 ).

The identity of the pollen was not established. In order not to damage the nests the Perspex sheets were not removed until after the imagines had emerged.

Cocoon. The cocoons were brown, smooth and papery on the inside and lightly covered with silk spinnings on the outside. Each cocoon occupied the inner two thirds of a cell, the outer third being closely packed with fecal pellets.

Associated insects.

A bombyliid larva was found in nest 1, suggesting that it had been responsible for the failed cell.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Megachilidae

Genus

Megachile