Protaxocrinus salteri? ( Angelin, 1878 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2010.0094 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF03720D-FFC5-FFF8-BCB7-F88D2284FDA6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Protaxocrinus salteri? ( Angelin, 1878 ) |
status |
|
Protaxocrinus salteri? ( Angelin, 1878)
Figs. 4C View Fig , 5E View Fig .
Material.—A single specimen (TUG 1395−4) from the Ninase Member, Jaani Formation (Wenlock) at Suuriku Cliff, Saaremaa Island, Estonia is questionably assigned to this taxon.
Description.—The crown is large and expanding ( Fig. 5E View Fig 1 View Fig ). The aboral cup has a low cone shape, the width to height ratio is approximately 1.6 ( Fig. 5E View Fig 2), and external plate sculpturing is not preserved. Infrabasal plates are visible in side view, and the infrabasal circlet is approximately 13% of aboral cup height. The CD basal is the only basal plate fully known; and it is hexagonal, wider than high, and smaller than radial plates. Parts of the C and D radial plates are visible, and they are probably hexagonal and are wider than high. Radial facets are plenary and straight. Three anal plates are in aboral cup ( Fig. 4C View Fig ). The radianal is immediately below the full width of the C radial and smaller than the C radial plate. The anal X is sutured below to CD basal and radianal and sutured laterally to the C and D radials. This fills the entire gap between the C and D radials. One additional anal plate is immediately above the anal X and is sutured laterally with the C radial.
Arms are completely separate above the radial plates and branch. The third primibrachial is axillary on the D−ray arm, and the second primibrachial is axillary on the C−ray arm. The first two or first two and one−half secundibrachials in a ray are sutured medially to the adjacent secundibrachial. On the D−ray arm, the third secundibrachial is axillary and the eighth tertibrachial is axillary. Arm divisions are slightly heterotomous. Brachials are uniserial rectangular, wider than high, with straight sutures. Pinnules are absent.
The column is xenomorphic. The proxistele narrows distally, and proxistele columnals range from approximately 6 to 15 times wider than high. Mesistele columnals are approximately 5 times wider than high.
Discussion.—TUG 1395−4 is an unusual crinoid that is difficult to place systematically. With the radianal occupying the full width beneath the C radial plate, this specimen is most similar to Protaxocrinus , and it probably represents a new species with a distinctive CD basal plate. However, the holotype and only known specimen is severely beach−worn, so that plate sculpturing is not preserved and other aspects of its morphology must be inferred with some question.
The exposed portion of the specimen clearly has a column with a proxistele, a dicyclic aboral cup, and a posterior interray, which are all very similar to Silurian Protaxocrinus . Because this specimen is so deeply weathered, it is impossible to verify whether the unusual anal plate arrangement is portrayed as it would be on a well−preserved specimen. At least one more, well−preserved specimen is needed to confidently describe this taxon.
The unique aspect of this specimen, which needs verification, is that the distal suture of the CD basal plate does not have an indentation to hold the anal X adjacent to the C radial plate and radianal. Instead, the anal X occupies the full width between the C and D radials ( Fig. 4C View Fig ). If this Estonian specimen is a new species, it would be characterized by this unusual plating in the posterior interray.
Protaxocrinus occurs on Gotland. Franzén−Bengtson (1983) listed four species: P. distensis ( Angelin, 1878) , P. interbrachiatus ( Angelin, 1878) , P. ovalis ( Angelin, 1878) ,
http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0094
and P. salteri ( Angelin, 1878) . Protaxocrinus distensis was unlocalized. Protaxocrinus salteri occurs in the Högklint and Slite formations, both Wenlock; P. interbrachiatus is only from the Wenlockian Slite Formation; and P. ovalis is from the Slite and Eke formations, Wenlock and Ludlow, respectively.
TUG 1395−4 is questionably placed in P. salteri because one specimen illustrated by Angelin (1878: pl. 22: 1) appears to have a CD interray quite similar to the Estonian specimen. However, Angelin’s (1878) illustration is not definitive, especially because a certain artistic license was commonly employed on these illustrations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Protaxocrinus salteri? ( Angelin, 1878 )
Ausich, William I., Wilson, Mark A. & Vinn, Olev 2012 |
Protaxocrinus
Springer 1906 |