Lepus nigricollis F. Cuvier, 1823
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353088 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7281158 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C061D547-FFC3-005C-FF2E-C5FA8A64F915 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Lepus nigricollis F. Cuvier, 1823 |
status |
|
Lepus nigricollis F. Cuvier, 1823 View in CoL . Diet. Sci. Nat., 26:307.
TYPE LOCALITY: "Malabar" [Madras, India].
DISTRIBUTION: Pakistan; India; Bangladesh, except Sunderbands; Sri Lanka; introduced into Java (?) and Mauritius, Gunnera Quoin, Anskya, Réunion and Cousin Isis in the Indian Ocean. Considered native to Java by McNeely (1981:931).
STATUS: Mainland (and Sri Lankan?) populations secure ( Flux and Angermann, 1990). If nigricollis is native to Java (rather than an introduced population), its numbers are now very low there.
SYNONYMS: aryabertensis Hodgson, 1844; cutchensis Kloss, 1918 ; dayanus Blanford, 1874 ; joongshaiensis Murray, 1884 ; macrotus Hodgson, 1840 ; mahadeva Wroughton and Ryley, 1913 ; rajput Wroughton, 1917 ; ruficaudatus Geoffroy, 1826 ; sadiya Kloss, 1918; simcoxi Wroughton, 1912 ; singhala Wroughton, 1915; tytleri Tytler, 1854 .
COMMENTS: Placed in Caprolagus (Indolagus) by Gureev (1964:139). Includes ruficaudatus ; see Prater (1980) and Angermann (1983), but see Gureev (1964: 142); ruficaudatus is closer to capensis according to Petter (1961), and nigricollis may include whytei, crawshayi , pequensis and siamensis; but also see comments under pequensis and saxatilis . Also includes dayanus , given specific status by Gureev (1964:139).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.