Acanthopharynx dormitata Leduc & Zhao, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.970.2755 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D69E85B6-D756-4862-AA0B-43C33A442CB8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14278120 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C12787EB-E53F-F15A-FE0D-FC80F761F832 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acanthopharynx dormitata Leduc & Zhao, 2016 |
status |
|
Acanthopharynx dormitata Leduc & Zhao, 2016 View in CoL
Fig. 13 View Fig , Table 4 View Table 4
Diagnosis
Acanthopharynx dormitata characterised by cephalic capsule with crown of 14 setae (four cephalic and ten subcephalic setae) and 24 additional subcephalic setae arranged in eight longitudinal rows, unspiral amphidial fovea, buccal cavity with crown of denticles, female reproductive system with spermatheca, male with nine precloacal and two postcloacal supplements, and gubernaculum surrounding spicules distally.
Material examined
NEW ZEALAND • 1 ♂; Kermadec Islands , Raoul Island (Homestead); 29.23660° S, 177.92683° W; depth 19 m; 22 Nov. 2021; coarse sand and gravel sediments, voyage TMOR2021 , station 84; NIWA 154953 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Type habitat and locality
Red seaweed partially covered in sediments and growing on boulders of the lower intertidal zone, Greta Point, Wellington, New Zealand (174.80489° E, 41.30356° S).
Remarks
The male Raoul Island specimen agrees well with the description of the species based on the Wellington specimens by Leduc & Zhao (2016) with respect to cuticle ornamentation, arrangement and size of anterior sensilla, buccal cavity armature, amphid shape, pharynx structure, shape of copulatory structures, shape and number of precloacal and postcloacal supplements, and tail morphology. The Raoul Island specimen, however, has a longer body (2954 vs 1809–2311 µm in the Wellington specimens), higher ratio of a (62 vs 38–50 in Wellington specimens) and c (35 vs 22–29 in Wellington specimens), slightly larger amphid (36 vs 25–30% cbd in Wellington specimens) and shorter spicules (49 vs 59–62 µm in Wellington specimens) and gubernaculum (24 vs 27–29 µm in Wellington specimens) ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). It could be argued that the latter discrepancies justify the erection of a new species; however, more specimens need to be observed and molecular data need to be obtained before to inform this decision. For the time being, the Raoul specimen is considered to belong to Acanthopharynx dormitata .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |