Cottus pitensis Bailey and Bond 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5154.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0590A223-BD2D-4B9E-8850-BEE818CA4D08 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6672358 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C14A87D6-FFD3-FFE6-2792-F92D5145FD7C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cottus pitensis Bailey and Bond 1963 |
status |
|
Cottus pitensis Bailey and Bond 1963 View in CoL .
Pit Sculpin
( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Cottus pitensis is described in detail by Bailey and Bond (1963), a description that largely overlaps that of C. gulosus . Diagnostic features are given below.
Holotype. UMMZ 130558 View Materials , adult male 83 mm SL, from North Fork , Pit River, 1934.
Paratypes. UMMZ 130559 View Materials , six specimens 55–76 mm SL .
Diagnosis. “Distinguished from gulosus by consistent absence of palatine teeth, the usually better-developed lateral line, and the typical complement of two preopercular spines ( Bailey and Bond 1963, p. 21). According to Bailey and Bond (1963), C. gulosus has 2–4 preopercular spines but usually 3, while C. pitensis has 1–3, but usually 2. In the original description, Girard (1854) noted that C. gulosus has two preopercular spines. All other characteristics show broad overlap ( Bailey and Bond 1963). Genomic studies ( Baumsteiger et al. 2014, this study) confirm its species status, as does the distinct distribution. See Table 1 View TABLE 1 for meristic counts on specimens used in this study (n=8).
Distribution. Endemic to the Pit River watershed in northeastern California and southeastern Oregon. Oregon populations are found in tributaries to Goose Lake, including Drews, Cottonwood, and Thomas creeks (Lake County, Oregon). In California, the Pit Sculpin is found in tributaries to Goose Lake (Lassen and Willow Creeks) and then south in streams throughout the Pit River watershed (Modoc and Shasta counties) to Squaw Valley Creek, now a tributary to Shasta Reservoir. Kinziger et al. (2016) note that the complex geologic history of the region has resulted in some population structure in the Pit Sculpin, suggesting further investigation of its taxonomic relationships is needed.
Etymology. Named after the Pit River, which encompasses its distribution. The Pit River was so named because early Euro-American visitors were impressed by the deep pits dug by the native peoples to trap wildlife ( Gudde and Bright 1998).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |