Folifemurum duplicatum, Che, Yanli, Zhang, Yalin & Wang, Yinglun, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3701.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:76A43D69-813C-4C77-9E62-2553D8D85415 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6150506 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C402C724-D212-FFFA-FF4D-FBC9331A4A6E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Folifemurum duplicatum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Folifemurum duplicatum View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 1–27 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 22 View FIGURES 23 – 27
Description. Length, male (including fore wing) (N=6): 4.0– 4.2 mm, length of fore wing: 3.5–3.6 mm; female (including fore wing) (N=4): 4.1–4.3 mm, length of forewing: 3.6–3.8 mm.
Colouration. Body, pronotum and mesonotum brown with pale yellow tubercles ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Coryphe brown with disc dark brown. Eyes black. Metope blackish brown suffused with pale yellow tubercles; postclypeus blackish brown ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Genae brown with blackish brown fascia ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Rostrum brown, apex blackish brown. Forewings brown, hind wings dark brown ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Legs brown, fore and middle femora blackish brown with pale yellow tubercles ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Venter and dorsum of abdomen dark brown, apex somewhat brown.
Head and Thorax. Coryphe ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) approximately pentagonal with disc depressed, apical margin slightly convex and basal margin suddenly concave, posterior angles acuminate, 1.8× wider at posterior angles than long at midline. Metope ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) granulose with disc slightly elevated, suffused with tubercles, median carina present, 1.8× longer at mid-length than widest part, 1.1× wider at widest part than at base. Genae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) with fascia directed towards corresponding eye near antenna. Metopoclypeal suture slightly arched. Postclypeus smooth, without carina. Pronotum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) with anterior margin distinctly convex and posterior margin nearly truncate; disc a little depressed with median carina two pits and scattered small tubercles. Mesonotum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) granulose with tubercles, short and stout, with pit on lateral margin; disc slightly elevated with median carina, 2.2× wider at the widest part than medial length. Forewings nearly elliptical, 2.3× longer than widest part; Sc+R vein forking near base, M and CuA veins simple; lots of indistinct and irregular transverse veinlets scattered on the forewing; CuP absent, claval vein Pcu and A1 fused distinctly before half of length ( Figs. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 22 , 23 View FIGURES 23 – 27 ). Hind wings small, shorter than half of forewings, 0.3 times length of forewing, veins indistinct ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Fore and middle femora slightly foliate ( Figs 6– 7 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Spinal formula of hind leg 8-8-2 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ).
Male genitalia. Anal tube ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ) in dorsal view mushroom-like and moderately large; latero-apical angle bearing a curved finger-shaped process directed ventrad; apical margin strongly convex in middle forming a big protrusion; in lateral view anal tube relatively wide, latero-apical angles long cylindrical and recurved. Anal column short, located at the middle of anal tube ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Genital styles ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 4 – 22 , 24 View FIGURES 23 – 27 ) moderately long, nearly triangular, almost same width near base as at apex; basal margin rounded, dorso-lateral margin producing a large tapering inward lobe, near middle hind margin exceedingly concave medially, caudoventral angle obtusely convex. Capitulum of style ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ) narrow and long with a large lateral tooth. Aedeagus deeply curved medially in lateral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Phallus ( Figs 12–14 View FIGURES 4 – 22 , 25–27 View FIGURES 23 – 27 ) with a pair of spiniform processes ventrally directed cephalad near middle; dorsolateral lobe of phallobase with a short tapering laminar process, with apex directed cephalad in dorsal view; ventral phallobase lobe with apical margin slightly concave medially, shorter than dorsolateral phallobase lobes. Pygofer with laterodorsal angles prominent; anterior margin slightly concave medially, longer than posterior margin, which is almost straight ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ).
Female genitalia. Anal tube in dorsal view nearly rectangular, apical margin nearly straight with angles obtuse and rounded; anal foramen in basal half ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Gonoplac nearly rectangular in lateral view, median area slightly elevated, third gonoplac lobes fused at base ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Lateral fields of posterior connective laminae of gonapophyses IX narrow and not projecting, lateral margins slightly obtusely convex in dorsal view; median field with shallow notch in apical part, lateral margins arched and slightly sclerised and pigmented, median portion membranous ( Figs 19, 20 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Gonospiculum bridge large, flattened laterally, spade-shaped ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Anterior connective lamina of gonapophysis VIII with three teeth in apical group and four short keeled teeth in lateral group, distal parts of posterior connective laminae angularly bent, median part weakly convex with apical margin slightly concave ( Figs 19, 20 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Gonocoxa VIII approximately rectangular ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ). Sternum VII with posterior margin nearly straight medially ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 4 – 22 ).
Material examined. Holotype ♂ (NWAFU) China, Sichuan Prov., Xiangcheng, 2900–3500 m, 28 June 1982, coll. Wang Shuyong.
Paratypes: 3♂♂1♀ (NWAFU), same data as holotype; 2♂♂1♀ (NWAFU), Sichuan Prov., Xiangcheng, 2900 m, 18 June 1982, coll. Wang Shuyong; 1♀ (NWAFU), Sichuan Prov., Xiangcheng, 2900 m, 28 June 1982, coll. Zhang Xuezhong; 1♀ (NWAFU), Yunnan Prov., Deqin, Benzilan, 2180 m, 23 August 1981, coll. Wang Shuyong.
Diagnosis. This species resembles Neodurium hamatum Wang & Wang (both without claval suture), but can be distinguished by the following characteristics: 1) coryphe with carina absent (both median and lateral carinae present in N. hamatum ); 2) mesonotum with only median carina present (median and 5 lateral carinae present in N. hamatum ); 3) metope, pronotum and mesonotum densely scattered with pale yellow tubercles (only pronotum sparsely scattered with tubercles in N. hamatum ); 4) phallus with a pair of spiniform processes ventrally directed cephalad near middle (2 hook-like processes at mid directed laterad in N. hamatum ).
Etymology. The Latin term “duplicatus” means double and refers to the fore and middle femur being slightly foliately dilated.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Fulgoroidea |
Family |
|
Genus |