Lynx rufus (Schreber 1777)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316519 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11343805 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C5E0D0F1-37C0-EAE7-13A6-21572048F562 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Lynx rufus (Schreber 1777) |
status |
|
Lynx rufus (Schreber 1777) View in CoL
[Felis] rufus Schreber 1777 View in CoL , Die Saugethiere, Vol. 3, 25: pl. 109. B [1777]; see also text 3 (24): 412 [1777].
Type Locality: "Provinz New York in Amerika".
Vernacular Names: Bobcat.
Subspecies: :
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. rufus Schreber 1777
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. baileyi Merriam 1890
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. californicus Mearns 1897
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. escuinapae J. A. Allen 1903
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. fasciatus Rafinesque 1817
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. floridanus Rafinesque 1817
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. gigas Bangs 1897
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. oaxacensis Goodwin 1963
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. pallescens Merriam 1899
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. peninsularis Thomas 1898
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. superiorensis Peterson and Downing 1952
Subspecies Lynx rufus subsp. texensis J. A. Allen 1895
Distribution: Canada (S British Columbia to Nova Scotia), Mexico (south to Oaxaca), USA.
Conservation: CITES – Appendix II; U.S. ESA – Endangered as L. rufus escuinapae . IUCN – Least Concern.
Discussion: Reviewed by Lariviere and Walton (1997). Mattern and McLennan (2000) demonstrated that a rufus lynx clade would be paraphyletic. Synonyms allocated according to Hall (1981) and Larivière and Walton (1997).
ESA |
Universidade de São Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.