Mesitiinae, Kieffer, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.960.2679 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D1577FA1-1E52-4A2F-A1BE-7A40C46E178F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13982956 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C604E518-AE53-1D75-FF66-84626E45A4A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mesitiinae |
status |
|
Key to the genera of the subfamily Mesitiinae from China (modified after Azevedo et al. 2018)
1. Female ............................................................................................................................................... 2
– Male .................................................................................................................................................. 3
2. Median mesonotal sulcus well developed on apical half of mesoscutum ( Fig. 12E View Fig ); anterior ocellus usually entirely anterior to imaginary top line of eyes in antero-dorsal view ( Fig. 10B View Fig ) ............................................................................................... Sulcomesitius Móczár, 1970
– Median mesonotal sulcus absent, mesoscutum broadly impressed in middle of apical half ( Figs 6E View Fig , 7E View Fig ); anterior ocellus usually crossing imaginary top line of eyes in antero-dorsal view ( Fig. 5B View Fig ) ............................................................................................... Heterocoelia Dahlbom, 1854
3. PPP absent ................................................................................................ Metrionotus Móczár, 1970
– PPP present ....................................................................................................................................... 4
4. Posterior margin of hypopygium incurved with branches broad and short, less than 0.3× length of hypopygium ( Figs 3H View Fig , 8G View Fig , 9H View Fig ) ........................................................................................................ 5
– Posterior margin of hypopygium deeply incurved with branches narrow and long, usually more than 0.4 × length of hypopygium ( Figs 11H View Fig , 13H View Fig , 14H View Fig ) .......................................................................... 6
5. Antennal setae long, longer than width of flagellomere ( Figs 8B View Fig , 9C View Fig ); aedeagus usually with apical sickle process ......................................................................................... Incertosulcus Móczár, 1970
– Antennal setae short, about one-third width of flagellomere ( Fig. 3C View Fig ); aedeagus without apical sickle process ................................................................................................. Heterocoelia Dahlbom, 1854
6. Dorsal pronotal area usually with anterolateral corner distinctly projected ( Fig. 16D View Fig ); basal part of hypopygium with lateral margin distinctly incurved and posterior branches of hypopygium usually filamentary ( Figs 17I View Fig , 18I View Fig ) .................................................................... Zimankos Argaman, 2003
– Dorsal pronotal area usually with anterolateral corner weakly projected ( Fig. 11D View Fig ); basal part of hypopygium with lateral margin usually parallel and posterior branches of hypopygium lobose ( Fig. 15H View Fig ) .............................................................................................. Sulcomesitius Móczár, 1970
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |