Lomechusoides suensoni ( Bernhauer, 1936 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3683.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC8FFCCA-001C-4B3E-876B-07F5A3B2405D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5243607 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C6421214-A41E-FFEC-FF5A-D9A0FDBDF97E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lomechusoides suensoni ( Bernhauer, 1936 ) |
status |
|
Lomechusoides suensoni ( Bernhauer, 1936) View in CoL
( Figs. 32–41 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L , 51 View FIGURES 51 – 52. 51, L )
Lomechusa Suensoni Bernhauer, 1936: 323 View in CoL . Type data: ein einziges Stück von (Nordalpen von Japan), 5000 ft. Lomechusa suensoni Bernhauer View in CoL : Schilow, 1981: 218, synonymy to Lomechusa amurensis View in CoL
Lomechusa hosodai Sawada, 1994: 363 View in CoL . Type data: Mt. Hoozan, Yamanashi Pref., central Japan, synonymy confirmed Lomechusoides hosodai ( Sawada, 1994) View in CoL : Maruyama & Hlaváč, 2004: 112 (new combination)
Lomechusoides hosodai ( Sawada, 1994) View in CoL : Hlaváč & al., 2011: 9 (synonymy to L. amurensis View in CoL due to the synonymy of L. suensoni View in CoL )
Type material studied. HOLOTYPE, 1Ƥ: (h) Kamikochi 5000 f. North. Alps Japan / (h) E. Suenson 16.IX.1934 / (h) Nothern Alps Japan /(h) Suensoni Brn. Typ un. / (h) Suensoni Bernh. Typus unic. Lomechusa / (p) Chicago NHMus M. Bernhauer Collection / (h) L. amurensis W. (p) W. Schilov 19 / red label (p) Lomechusa suensoni Bernhauer det. Maruyama 2001 / red label (p) Holotype Lomechusoides suensoni Bernhauer, 1936 , T. Jászay & P. Hlaváč det., 2012. ( FNHM). Other material: 13: (p) Japan: Hon Shu, Hoo goya Hoo-san, Yamanashi Pref.. 2.IX.1987, K. Hosoda leg. /(h) same locality and collector as Ƥ / Topotypes of L. hosodai , PHKS; 1Ƥ: (p) Houou [Hôô] lodge, Yamanashi, 16.IX.1991, K. Hosoda / slide no. 0 0 86, M. Maruyama, 1999, PHKS; 13: (p) Houou lodge, Yamanashi, 20.IX.1991, K. Hosoda / Yasuhiko Hayashi, Collection, Aleocharinae , KUEC; 1Ƥ: (h) Near Shibunoyu, Kita-Yatsugatake, 11.IX.1977, Hideo Yada leg. / Shibata coll., KUEC; 1Ƥ: (h) Nomugi-Pass, Nagano Pref., 18.IX.1987, S. Tsuyuki leg. / Shibata coll. / slide no.0088, M. Maruyama 1999, KUEC; 13: Mugikusa-toge (2050–2100), Sakuho-chô, Nagano-ken, 8.VI.2008, R. Shimoyama leg., KUEC; 13, 1Ƥ: Mugikusa-toge (2050– 2100), Sakuho-chô, Nagano-ken, 8.V.2010, R. Shimoyama leg., KUEC; 13: Hôô-goya (2400 m), Hôô-san, Yamanashi-ken, 5.X.1988, K. Hosoda leg., KUEC; 13: Jônen-goya (2400 m), Jônen-dake, Hodaka-machi, Minamiazumi-gun, Nagano-ken, 29.IX.2000, Y. Ôshima leg., KUEC; 13: Kurumijima, Asahi-chô, Takayama-shi, Gifu-ken, 20/ 21.VIII.1992, Y. Takai leg., KUEC; 1Ƥ: Shôgen-toge (1800 m), Tabayama-mura, Yamanashi-ken, 18.VII.1951, S. Tsuyuki leg., KUEC; 13: Sawabi-daira/Chichibu-zawa (1600 m), Hida-sanmyaku, Gifu-ken, 15.IX.1988, Y. Takai leg., KUEC.
Redescription. Body lighter reddish-brown ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 51 – 52. 51, L ), head, and wide basal margin of tergites darker.
Head quadrate, longer than wide (HW/HL=0.86), with shallow median, sparsely microsculptured frontal triangular depression, anterior part shining, length of eyes 0.25 that of head; temples in middle slightly narrowed, extended posteriorly, postoccipital process well-defined ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L ). Antennae ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L ) longer, scape 1.65 times as long as wide and 2.35 times as long as pedicel, all antennomeres elongate, pedicel 1.1 times as wide as long, antennomeres III 1.16 and and IV 1.10 as long as wide, terminal antennomere thin and acute, 1.10 times as long as scape, relative length of antennomeres from base to apex: 20: 10: 13: 15: 17: 17: 17: 16: 16: 16: 22.
Pronotum ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L ) bicoloured, pronotal disc slightly darker, with clearly convex anterior margin, sides straight, extended posteriorly, round in posterior third with deep lateral depressions, surface of this depressions with weak microsculpture, disc smooth, with dense, uneven puncturation, basal median lobe broadly rounded, pronotum in hind corners as wide as humeral width of elytra; ratio: PW/PL =1.52. Metaventrite with metaventral process with anterior corners sharply angled, anterior margin straight, lateral margins convex ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L ), metaventral process in anterior part with weakly defined lens-like depression bounded with rounded groove, surface unevenly punctured and with short setae, setae reaching margin of next puncture, metaventral disc with sparse microsculpture.
Elytra finely punctured, distance between punctures longer than puncture diameter, 1.13 times shorter than pronotum on median line, ratio: EW/EL=1.71.
Abdomen with tergite II densely punctured and setaceous, distance between punctures on posterior margin greater than double of puncture diameter, tergites III–IV with fine puncturation and setation on posterior margin, tergites V–VII sparsely but finely punctured at base, densely punctured on lateral parts, tergites II–VIII lacking microsculpture, only tergites V–VI with microsculpture on lateral sides, tergite and sternite VIII as in Fig. 36 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L a, 36b, 37a, 37b.
Aedeagus as in Fig. 38 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L median lobe robust, basal bulb wide with well-developed distal crest and basal bridge, internal structures weakly-defined, apical lobe tube-like, markedly thicken, apical part sharp, with many pseudopores. Paramera ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L ) with oval paramerit, velum smaller than paramerit, apical lobe subparallel, hookshaped bent backwards, apex with about four setae and couple of pseudopores.
Spermatheca as in Fig. 40, 41 View FIGURES 32 – 41. L , basal part V-shaped, apical part one half shorter but almost twice as wide as basal part, internal wall in apical part densely wrinkled.
Measurements. (Holotype), body length 5.45 mm; forebody length 2.90 mm; head length: 0.87 mm; head width: 0.75 mm; antennal length 2.50 mm; pronotal length 1.15 mm; pronotal width 1.75 mm; elytral length 1.05 mm; elytral width 1.80 mm; foretibial length 1.12 mm; midtibial length 1.40 mm; hindtibial length 1.70 mm
Differencial diagnosis. L. suensoni can be readily separated from other species of the group by markedly broad antennomeres, shallow frontal triangular depression, by characteristic shape of metaventral process and spermatheca, apical part of middle lobe of aedeagus markedly thicken, antenomeres III–IV in males lacking setae.
Host ant. Formica lemani Bondroit, 1917
Distribution. Japan (Honshu)
KUEC |
Kyushu University Entomology Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lomechusoides suensoni ( Bernhauer, 1936 )
Jászay, Tomáš & Hlaváč, Peter 2013 |
Lomechusoides hosodai (
Hlavac 2011: 9 |
Lomechusa hosodai
Maruyama 2004: 112 |
Sawada 1994: 363 |
Lomechusa Suensoni Bernhauer, 1936 : 323
Schilow 1981: 218 |
Bernhauer 1936: 323 |