Arthromelodes crassicornis, Yin, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5111.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:836B0F69-037C-4D0F-80DB-94FE454F48E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6964214 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C822F213-FFD2-246C-CB88-A36E71B6229A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arthromelodes crassicornis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Arthromelodes crassicornis View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 , 77C View FIGURE 77 , 97C View FIGURE 97 , 100A View FIGURE 100 )
Chinese common name: ÝOnjà甲
Type material ( 59 exx.). HOLOTYPE: CHINA: ♂, ‘China: Xizang, Nyingchi City, Pailong Country , 30°0’34.71”N, 94°57’57.64”E, 2190 m, 2019.vii.17, leaf litter, Z.-W. Yin leg., [ƱẪffżḦË 318 Ǟdzƛḡ]’ ( SNUC). GoogleMaps PARATYPES: CHINA: 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀, same data as that of holotype; GoogleMaps 9 ♂♂, same locality and collector, except vii.15– viii.1, FIT; GoogleMaps 13 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀, same locality, except ‘ 2069 m, 30°1’11.1”N, 95°0’0.46”E, 15.viii.2017, X.-B. Song leg.’; GoogleMaps 4 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀, same locality, except ‘ 30°0’35”N, 94°57’58”E, 2180 m, 10.vii.2021, Z. Peng, Z. Yin & W. Zhang leg.’; GoogleMaps 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀, ‘China: Xizang, Mêdog County, near 80K, 29°41’09”N, 95°30’10”E, alt. 2330 m, mixed leaf litter, sifted, 09.vii.2018, Cheng, Peng & Shen leg.’ (all paratypes in SNUC). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Male. Body length 1.92–1.94 mm. Head sub-rectangular at base; vertexal foveae large and asetose, lacking sulcus connecting them; antenna short; antennomeres moniliform, 9–11 enlarged and with dense short setae on dorsal surface. Discal stria of elytron extending to apical 2/5 of elytral length. Legs almost simple, only mesotibia with small apical spur. Metaventrite with dense setose area admesally. Sternite 2 (IV) with pair of trichomes lateral to midline. Aedeagus strongly asymmetric; median lobe with large basal capsule and triangular foramen, dilated at apex; dorsal lobe curved, apical part strongly bent downwards, with pointed apex. Female. Body length 1.85–1.92 mm; antennal club and metaventrite lacking modifications, mesotibia lacking apical spur, genitalia as in Fig. 5I View FIGURE 5 .
Description. Male. Body ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) length 1.92–1.94 mm; color dark reddish-brown, tarsi and mouthparts lighter. Dorsal surface of body covered with moderately long pubescence.
Head ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ) sub-rectangular at base, approximately as long as wide, length 0.40–0.43 mm, width across eyes 0.41–0.44 mm; vertex finely punctate, with two exceptionally long setae near base and normal ones, with large, asetose vertexal foveae (dorsal tentorial pits), lacking U-shaped sulcus connecting foveae or mediobasal carina, with T-shaped sulcus at middle and few large punctures anterior and lateral to anterior margin of sulcus; antennal tubercles hardly raised; frons slightly impressed medially, confluent with clypeus; clypeus with smooth surface, its anterior margin carinate and moderately raised; ocular-mandibular carina present. Venter with two small gular foveae (posterior tentorial pits) originating from shared transverse slit, with distinct median carina extending from foveae anteriorly to mouthparts. Eyes moderately prominent, composed of approximately 35 ommatidia. Antenna relatively short, length 0.86 mm, apical three antennomeres forming distinct club; antennomere 1 thick, subcylindrical, 2–8 each moniliform, 9 much larger than 8, 10 slightly longer and broader than 9, 11 largest, as long as 9 and 10 combined, truncate at base and narrowed apically, dorsal surface of antennomeres 9–11 ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ) covered with short, dense setae.
Pronotum ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ) approximately as long as broad, length 0.42–0.46 mm, width 0.44 mm, widest at middle; lateral margins rounded; disc slightly convex, finely punctate, with few exceptionally long setae at base and lateral areas of disc and normal ones, median longitudinal sulcus slightly shorter than semicircular lateral sulci in dorsal view, the latter extending from dorsal surface laterally and posteriorly and then fusing with lateral ends of antebasal sulcus; lacking median antebasal fovea, lateral antebasal foveae connected by transverse antebasal sulcus; outer and inner pair of basolateral foveae distinct. Prosternum with anterior part as long as coxal part, with large lateral procoxal foveae; hypomeral ridge present at basal 2/3, with punctiform lateral antebasal hypomeral pit; margin of coxal cavity weakly carinate.
Elytra much wider than long, length 0.57–0.64 mm, width 0.69–0.75 mm; each elytron with two large, asetose basal foveae, lacking subbasal fovea; discal stria extending from outer basal fovea to apical 2/5 of elytral length; humerus weakly prominent, with small subhumeral fovea, sulcate marginal stria extending from fovea to posterior margin of elytron.
Mesoventrite short, demarcated from metaventrite by ridged anterior edges of impressed areas where lateral mesocoxal foveae situated at mesal margins, with pair of thin admesal carinae; setose median mesoventral foveae widely separated, lateral mesoventral foveae large and setose, broadly forked internally; intercoxal process short. Metaventrite ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ) broadly impressed at middle, lateral areas of impression with long, dense setae; with large, setose lateral mesocoxal foveae and pair of smaller, setose lateral metaventral foveae, posterior margin with small and narrow split at middle.
Legs moderately elongate, lacking distinct modifications. Mesotibia ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ) with tiny apical tubercle.
Abdomen widest at lateral margins of tergite 1 (IV), length 0.46–0.49 mm, width 0.65–0.67 mm. Tergite 1 (IV) longer than tergites 2–4 (V–VII) combined in dorsal view, setose basal sulcus separated by mediobasal and one pair of basolateral foveae, lacking discal or marginal carinae; tergites 2–4 (V–VII) tightly compressed, each with one pair of basolateral foveae, tergite 4 longer than 2 and 3 combined along middle, tergite 5 (VIII) broad and slightly transverse, posterior margin roundly emarginate at middle. Sternite 2 (IV) with large mediobasal and two pairs of basolateral foveae in broad setose basal impression; midlength of sternite 2 (IV) approximately as long as 3–6 (V–VIII) combined, 3–5 each with one pair of indistinct basolateral foveae. Sternite 7 (IX) ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ) transverse, posterior margin with scattered setae.
Aedeagus ( Fig. 5G, H View FIGURE 5 ) 0.37 mm long, strongly asymmetric; median lobe with large basal capsule and sub-triangular foramen, ventral stalk in ventral view with broadened apex; dorsal lobe elongate and strongly curved, apically strongly bent downwards and pointed at apex; parameres absent.
Female. Similar to male in external morphology; antenna shorter; antennal club ( Fig. 5I View FIGURE 5 ), metaventrite and sternite 2 (IV) lacking modifications; each compound eye composed of approximately 20 ommatidia; humeral angle rounded; mesotibia lacking apical spur, tergite 5 (VIII) not emarginate medially. Measurements (as for male): body length 1.85–1.92 mm; length/width of head 0.40–0.42/ 0.41 mm, pronotum 0.43/ 0.43–0.44 mm, elytra 0.51– 0.55/ 0.70 mm; abdomen 0.51–0.53/ 0.65–0.68 mm; length of antenna 0.77–0.79 mm; maximum width of genitalia ( Fig. 5J View FIGURE 5 ) 0.25 mm.
Comparative notes. The new species can be readily identified by the unique modifications of the male antennal clubs and the form of the aedeagus. The setose posterior area of the metaventrite of the male is similarly shared with A. nepaeformis and A. lebus , which may indicate close relationships between these species.
Distribution. Chagyib District (Nyingchi) and Mêdog County, Tibet, SW China ( Figs 77C View FIGURE 77 , 97C View FIGURE 97 , 100A View FIGURE 100 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is formed by the Latin words ‘ crassus -a -um (dense, thick, solid)’ and ‘ cornis (horned)’, referring to the relatively short antennae and stout male antennal clubs of this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |