Centris (Paracentris) pallida Fox
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17161/jom.i104.13782 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8057535 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C92A87E8-FFDA-FFF5-FE5A-F9B714F3FAEB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Centris (Paracentris) pallida Fox |
status |
|
Centris (Paracentris) pallida Fox View in CoL View at ENA
Gynandromorph
( Figs. 1–10 View Figures 1–5 View Figure 6–9 View Figures 10–12 )
DESCRIPTION: Body length 8.3 mm; head height 3.9 mm (w/labrum: 5.0 mm), head width 5.4 mm; mesosoma width 6.2 mm; metasoma width 5.9 mm.
Head. General appearance male-like; 11 flagellomeres on each antenna and clypeus yellow ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–5 ). Pubescence mostly white on labrum, vertex, and parocular area, sides of head pale grey, pubescence on frons darker brown or tan around ocelli; no distinct morphological differences between sides ( Figs. 1–4 View Figures 1–5 ).
Mesosoma. Mix of male and female features. Bilateral split in pubescence coloration on the mesoscutum and mesoscutellum, right side generally pale in coloration like large male morph, except for a tan spot near tegula, left side pubescence tan, more similar to a small morph male or female in coloration ( Figs. 2–4 View Figures 1–5 ). Fore and middle legs generally female in appearance. Hind right leg female, hind left leg a mix of male and female features ( Figs. 6–9 View Figure 6–9 ). Medial side of leg appears female – darker colored, bushy scopal hairs on tibia and basitarsus ( Fig 7 View Figure 6–9 ). Lateral side of leg appears male – pubescence light grey and less dense in appearance on tibia and basitarsus ( Fig. 8 View Figure 6–9 ). Hind right leg with smaller than normal (for females) basitibial plate, centered towards the medial side of the tibia ( Figs. 2, 4 View Figures 1–5 ).
Metasoma. Not strongly sexually dimorphic in the first four terga/sterna, greyish-brown dorsally, with overall shape, and ventral setae density patern female-like. The specimen has seven exposed terga as in males (terga 1–5 easily visible in figure 5, terga 6 and 7 most visible in figure 10); terga 5 and 6 more closely match a male morphology, missing the heavily raised pygidial plate, and darker pygidial and prepygidial fimbria, of a female ( Figs. 10–12 View Figures 10–12 ). The genitalia appear to be female; on T6, there is a sting that may only be partially developed (recessed; Fig. 10 View Figures 10–12 ) along with sting sheath (clearly visible surrounding the female sting in figure 12), however these could also be weakly developed male gonostyli (see figure 11 for comparison to a large male morph). To preserve the integrity of the specimen, dissection of the genitalia was not possible.
MATERIAL EXAMINED: The specimen is at the University of Arizona Insect Collection, Number UAIC 1052985.
UAIC |
University of Alabama, Ichthyological Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |