Otostigmus orientalis Porat, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3889.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F5294390-C1C6-4011-89F7-76BBCE641919 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5661027 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C95387E9-4064-F14D-B8D7-0B0EC4AFFF6A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Otostigmus orientalis Porat, 1876 |
status |
|
Otostigmus orientalis Porat, 1876 View in CoL
( Figs 50–53 View FIGURES 50 – 53 )
O. orientalis Porat, 1876 View in CoL , 19. India.
O. splendens Pocock, 1890 View in CoL , 245. India.
O. morsitans Pocock, 1890 View in CoL , 246. India.
O. orientalis: Pocock, 1894 View in CoL , 312. Flores: Maumerie (list only).
O. orientalis: Pocock, 1895 View in CoL , 347. Manilla (list only).
Nec O. orientalis Brölemann, 1895 View in CoL , 527. Seychelles.
O. orientale: Attems, 1897 , 478. Borneo, Halmahera (list only).
O. seychellarum Attems 1900 View in CoL , 136. (Not a synonym of O. insularis Haase, 1887 , itself a synonym of O. scaber Porat, 1896 View in CoL , as proposed by Kraepelin, 1903).
O. orientalis: Kraepelin, 1903 View in CoL , 120, Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55 – 62 .
O. orientalis: Chamberlin: 1920 View in CoL , 14.
O. (O.) orientalis: Attems, 1930 View in CoL , 139.
O. orientalis: Yadav, 1993 View in CoL , 171. India.
O. (O.) splendens: Lewis, 1996 View in CoL , 823, Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 4 –8.
O. (O.) morsitans: Lewis, 1996 View in CoL , 825, Figs 9–13.
O. splendens: Sureshan et al. 2006, 2286 View in CoL . India (doubtful).
Nec O. (O). orientalis View in CoL : Lewis, 2007, 12, Fig. 5–10.
Nec O. (O). orientalis View in CoL : Lewis, 2010b, 389, Figs 7 & 8.
Diagnosis. (Based on syntypes and Pocock’s O. morsitans and O. splendens ). Length 36–65 mm. Antennal articles 17, the basal 2.25–2.33 (atypically 3) glabrous. Forcipular coxosternal teeth (3)4+4(5). Tergites with complete paramedian sutures from 5 or 6, with or without weak lateral corrugations and very rarely with spinules on posterior tergites, marginate from 7 or 8. Sternites with very short anterior paramedian sutures or none. Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment trapezoidal, ratio of length to width varying from 0.91:1 to 1.3:1 the posterior margin slightly concave or straight. Coxopleural process with two apical and one lateral spine. Two tarsal spurs on first 4 or 5 pairs of legs, the remainder to 20 with one, 21 without. Ultimate leg prefemoral spines typically VL 3, VM 2, M 0, DM 0 or 1, CS 0.
Material examined. SMNH. Otostigmus orientalis v Por, Bombay 1845 Colleg ..... Determ C. O. v Porat. Three specimens 63, 62 and 60 mm, presumably syntypes.
Description of syntypes. (Data from Kraepelin’s (1903) redescription in parentheses). Length 60–63 (70) mm. Antennae (long) of 17 articles, the basal 2.25–2.33 glabrous dorsally. Forcipular coxosternal teeth 4+4 ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 50 – 53 ) or 4+3. Specimen 2 has, atypically, 6+4 ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 50 – 53 ) (4+4 large teeth).
Tergites with complete paramedian sutures from 5 or 6 (5), marginate from 7 or 8 (7) with or without weak lateral corrugations and without spinules. Ultimate tergite a little longer than wide.
Sternites without paramedian sutures but with three weak obscure depressions, or only one, or none (two weak lateral depressions in middle of sternite and one small median at hind margin). Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment ratio of length to width: 1.17:1 to 1.3:1 (1½ times as long as wide) with sides converging and posterior margin slightly concave ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 50 – 53 ) or straight ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 50 – 53 ) (posterior corners almost rectangular). Coxopleural process moderately long with two apical and one lateral spine. No dorsal spine.
Two tarsal spurs on first four or five pairs of legs (only one or two with two tarsal spurs), the remainder to 20 with one, 21 without. Ultimate leg prefemoral spines VL 3, VM 2, DM 0 or 1, CS 0 (VL 3, VM 2-3, M 0–1, DM 0 or with minute spine, CS 0). Typically five spines in two rows in normal legs. Regenerated legs show higher numbers.
Remarks. The specimens from the Seychelles which Lewis (2007, 2010b) identified as O. orientalis are here assigned to O. seychellarum which is cautiously reinstated (see below).The Indian records of O. splendens (a junior synonym of O. orientalis as noted above) given by Sureshan et al. (2006) require confirmation as neither of the diagnostic characters given by the authors namely “coxopleural process with dorsal spine, anal legs with prefemoral process" are characters of O. orientalis . Pocock’s 1894 and 1895 records from Flores and Manila respectively and Attems’ 1897 record from Borneo and Halmahera seem unlikely and require confirmation. Otostigmus orientalis is currently only known for certain from India.
SMNH |
Saskatchewan Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Otostigmus orientalis Porat, 1876
Lewis, John G. E. 2014 |
O. orientalis:
Chamberlin 1920: 1920 |