Otostigmus multidens Haase, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3889.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F5294390-C1C6-4011-89F7-76BBCE641919 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5661017 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C95387E9-407F-F150-B8D7-0F7FC7F9F8F2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Otostigmus multidens Haase, 1887 |
status |
|
Otostigmus multidens Haase, 1887 View in CoL
(Figs 41–44)
Otostigmus multidens Haase, 1887 View in CoL , 75. Celebes [Sulawesi].
Nec Otostignus ruficeps Pocock, 1890 , 247. India. (Incorrectly synonymised under O. multidens View in CoL by Lewis, 1996, 828, Figs 20 View FIGURES 12 – 20 –23).
Otostigmus latidens Pocock, 1894 View in CoL , 313. Java.
Otostigma modiglianii Silvestri, 1895 , 715. Mentaway Island, Sumatra.
Otostigmus multidens: Kraepelin, 1903 View in CoL , 121, Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55 – 62 .
O. (O.) multidens: Attems, 1930 View in CoL , 141, Fig. 172. Tawarin Island, New Guinea, [ Papua].
O. multidens: Attems, 1938 View in CoL , 336. Vietnam.
O. multidens carens Attems, 1938 View in CoL , 336. Syn. nov. Vietnam. (See below).
O. armatus Attems, 1953 View in CoL , 146. Laos.
O. (O.) multidens: Lewis, 1982 View in CoL , 392, Figs12–16 View FIGURES 12 – 20 . Sarawak.
O. (O.) multidens: Lewis, 1984 View in CoL , 36, Fig. 3.14. Sarawak.
O. (O.) multidens: Lewis, 1991 View in CoL , 340, Figs 8–10. Krakatau.
O. multidens: Schileyko, 1992 View in CoL , 8 (in table). Vietnam.
O. multidens multidens: Schileyko, 1995 View in CoL , 71 (in key).
O. (O.) multidens: Lewis, 2001 View in CoL , 19, Figs 34–36. Sumatra, Kalimantan. O. armatus: Lewis 2004 View in CoL , 27, Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 4 –7. Laos.
O. multidens multidens: Tran et al., 2013 View in CoL , 225 (checklist). Vietnam.
Diagnosis. (Incorporating data for O. loriae ). Length up to 60 mm. (19) 21–22 (23, 24) antennal articles, the basal 2–2.5 glabrous. Each forcipular coxosternal tooth-plate with 6–10 teeth generally with an inner group of three main teeth an outer of two or three (Fig. 41). Tergites sometimes with low lateral ridges, with ( loriae ) or without spinules, with complete paramedian sutures from 5, 6 or 7 (8), marginate from 7–11 (14). Sternites with short anterior paramedian sutures. Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment trapezoidal. Coxopleural process of moderate length with two or three apical (two apical+one subapical), (0), 1, 2 (3) lateral spines. A tibial spur on legs 1–15, 16, 17, 18. Two tarsal spurs on legs 1–(14), 16, 17, 18, 19 (20), the rest to 20 with one. Ultimate leg prefemoral spines VL 3–4 (5), VM 2–4, M 0 (2) DM 0, 1, 2, CS 1. In total (6) 7–12 plus a corner spine.
Material examined and descriptions. BMNH. Otostigma latidens Pocock co-type 96.10.6.8. Buitenzorg [Bogor], Java. 58 mm. 21 antennal articles, the 2.33 basal glabrous. 6+6 coxosternal teeth (very worn). With complete paramedian sutures from 7, marginate from 11. Coxopleural process with two apical and one or two lateral spines. Legs 1-17 with two tarsal spurs (18–20 missing). Tibial spurs abnormally absent on 1–16 but present on 17. Ultimate leg prefemoral sapines VL 4, VM 2, DM 1, CS 1.
Ot. latidens . Nab River Borneo Hose 95.7.13.18 = O. multidens Haase. 44mm. Antennae damaged, the basal 2–2.25 articles glabrous. 7+6 coxosternal teeth. Tergites with complete paramedian sutures from T7, marginate from 11. Coxopleural process with three apical, no lateral spines. Legs 1–18 with one tibial spur, 1–17 with two tarsal spurs, 18–20 with one, ultimate leg without. Ultimate leg prefemoral spines VL 3, VM 2, DM 2, CS 1.
Otostigma latidens Pocock , [Mount] Salak [Java] R. Kirkpatrick. 91.4.30.4 (Java). = O. multidens Haase. 47 mm. Antennal articles 22, the basal 2.5 glabrous. 8+9 worn forcipular coxosternal teeth. With complete paramedian sutures from 7, marginate from 11. Coxopleural process with three apical, one or two lateral spines. Leg 1 missing, 2–18 with one tibial spur, 2–18 with two tarsal spurs, 19 and 20 with one. Ultimate legs missing.
O. multidens . Peat swamp forest nr. Kereng Benkiavi, Sungai Sabangan, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, 09/08/ 94. P. Jenkins. Bucket trap. Two incomplete specimens. Antennal articles 22[d], the basal 2.2 glabrous. 7+7 and 6+6 forcipular coxosternal teeth. With complete paramedian sutures from T8 and 7, marginate from 7 and 9. Leg 1 with a femoral spur, legs 1–16 with a tibial spur, legs 1–18 with two, 19 with one, 20 without tarsal spurs. Ultimate legs missing.
SMNH. Otostigma orientale Porat Java, Salak 1000 m Juni 1897, Colleg Hj Möller Determ. Attems. 49 mm. Antennal articles 22, the basal 2.5 glabrous. 9+6 forcipular coxosternal teeth (Fig. 42). With complete paramedian sutures from 6, marginate from 9. Coxopleural process with three apical and one lateral spine. Legs 1–18 with one tibial and two tarsal spurs, leg19 with one tarsal spur, 20 and 21 without. Right ultimate leg (probably regenerated) with prefemoral spines VL 6, VM 2, 2, DM 2, CS 1 (Fig. 43), the left VL 3, VM 3, DM 1, CS 1 (Fig. 44).
ZSM. Otostigmus spinosus Porat. Java coll. Verhoeff. 59 mm. Antennal articles 21, the basal 2.25 glabrous. 8+8 forcipular coxosternal teeth. With complete paramedian sutures from T6, marginate from 10. Coxopleural process with two or three apical and one lateral spine. Legs to 15 with one tibial, to 16 with two tarsals, 17–20 with one tarsal, ultimate legs without tarsal spurs. NB no dorsodistal spine on prefemur of leg 20. Ultimate leg prefemoral spines VL 3, VM 3, DM 0, CS 1.
Remarks. Haase (1887) described O. multidens as having a single tibial spur on legs 1–7 rather than on 1–17, 18 or 19. This may represent geographical variation but is probably an error and has been excluded from the diagnosis. Attems (1938) described O. multidens from Vietnam with ultimate leg prefemur spines as VL 3 or 4, VM and M 7 without clear division. This is atypical, probably due to regeneration. Otostigmus multidens appears to be highly variable with respect to the number of forcipular coxosternal teeth and the number of ultimate prefemoral spines but, despite this, cannot be clearly subdivided into separate populations using morphological data.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Otostigmus multidens Haase, 1887
Lewis, John G. E. 2014 |
O. multidens multidens:
Tran et al. 2013 |
O. armatus:
Lewis 2004 |
O. (O.) multidens:
Lewis 2001 |
O. multidens multidens:
Schileyko 1995 |
O. multidens:
Schileyko 1992 |
O. (O.) multidens:
Lewis 1991 |
O. (O.) multidens:
Lewis 1984 |
O. (O.) multidens:
Lewis 1982 |
O. armatus
Attems 1953 |
O. multidens:
Attems 1938 |
O. multidens carens
Attems 1938 |
O. (O.) multidens:
Attems 1930 |
Otostigmus multidens:
Kraepelin 1903 |
Otostigma modiglianii
Silvestri 1895 |
Otostigmus latidens
Pocock 1894 |
Otostignus ruficeps
Pocock 1890 |
Otostigmus multidens
Haase 1887 |