Tissahamia karuna, Huber, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4550.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F7D1EC4-D4ED-4FAE-B227-CF7B79EAE833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4581668 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA3B104C-FF8F-FF81-FF3D-FF39FBF5E6B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tissahamia karuna |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tissahamia karuna View in CoL sp. n.
Figures 97–98 View FIGURES 93–102 , 107–111 View FIGURES 103–109 View FIGURES 110–115 , 116–117 View FIGURES 116–119 , 120–121 View FIGURES 120–125
Diagnosis. Males are easily distinguished from most similar species ( T. maturata Huber, 2011 ) by details of palp: coxa with finger-shaped ventral process ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 103–109 ); prolateral process of main bulbal process (‘appendix’) small and weakly sclerotized ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 116–119 ); procursus shorter, without sclerotized prolateral process between proximal and distal elements and with larger distal elements ( Fig. 110 View FIGURES 110–115 ). Females are barely distinguishable from T. maturata but seem to have consistently more weakly sclerotized epigyna and the anterior epigynal margin more curved ( Fig. 120 View FIGURES 120–125 ).
Etymology. The species name is derived from the Pāli word karuṇā, one of the four Buddhist virtues or brahmavihāras (identifying the suffering of others as one's own); noun in apposition.
Type material. SRI LANKA: ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 20065), Western Province, Labugama Forest (6.846°N, 80.175°E), 150 m a.s.l., 20.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined. SRI LANKA: 1♂ 1♀, NMSL , 6♂ 8♀, ZFMK ( Ar 20066–67), and 4♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL167 About ZFMK ), same data as holotype GoogleMaps . 3♂ 3♀, ZFMK ( Ar 20068), and 1♂ 2♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL97 About ZFMK ), Western Province, Mitirigala Forest (6.997°N, 80.175°E), 70 m a.s.l., 6.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 2♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL105 About ZFMK ), Sabaragamuwa Province, near Kitulgala (6.985°N, 80.430°E), 170 m a.s.l., 7.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♀, ZFMK (Ar 5088) (this female was erroneously assigned to Pholcus maturat a in Huber 2011), Western Province, Avissawella [6.953°N, 80.218°E], 3.viii.1996 (S.P. Benjamin) GoogleMaps .
Description. Male (holotype). MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 4.4, carapace width 1.0. Distance PME- PME 400 µm, diameter PME 100 µm, distance PME-ALE 40 µm; AME absent. Sternum width/length: 0.63/0.47. Leg 1: 37.9 (8.8 + 0.4 + 9.0 + 17.6 + 2.1), tibia 2: 5.9, tibia 3: 3.3, tibia 4: 5.3; tibia 1 L/d: 113. Femora 1–4 width (at half length): all 0.09.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace mostly dark brown to black, including ocular area and clypeus, only lateral margins and beside ocular area whitish; sternum brown; legs pale ochre-yellow, patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints dark brown to black; abdomen pale with dark marks dorsally and laterally, ventrally monochromous.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 97 View FIGURES 93–102 ; ocular area slightly raised, each triad on short stalk, with curved pointed process (~100 µm long) arising from median margin of each PME; with small process (~20 µm long) in place of AME; carapace without median furrow; clypeus and sternum unmodified.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 116 View FIGURES 116–119 , with pair of weakly sclerotized processes proximally, without distal modification.
PALPS. As in Figs 107–109 View FIGURES 103–109 ; coxa with finger-shaped ventral process (longer than in T. maturata and T. kottawagamaensis ; cf. Huber 2011: figs 805–806; Dong et al. 2016: figs 5A–B); trochanter with short retrolaterodorsal and longer pointed retrolatero-ventral apophyses, very similar to T. kottawagamaensis ; femur with dorsal hump and ventral process pointing toward proximal; tarsus with whitish elongation with tarsal organ at its tip; procursus complex ( Figs 110–111 View FIGURES 110–115 ), with bifid dorsal process partly covered retrolaterally by transparent membrane, prolateral tip of bifid process connected to strong ridge that leads to ventral ‘knee’ and borders ventral pocket; distally with ventral hinged sclerite; genital bulb with simple membranous embolus and large heavily sclerotized bulbal process (‘appendix’) with small weakly sclerotized prolateral process ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 116–119 ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 pseudosegments not seen.
Male (variation). Tibia 1 in 9 other males: 6.8–9.0 (mean 8.2). Males from Mitirigala with slightly wider tip of appendix and with small conical process on proximal part of bifid dorsal process of procursus (asterisk in Fig. 110 View FIGURES 110–115 ).
Female. In general similar to male but carapace mostly light with small U-shaped dark mark ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 93–102 ), triads closer together (distance PME-PME 210 µm), without processes arising from near PME, without small process in place of AME. Tibia 1 in 13 females: 6.4–7.2 (mean 6.8). Epigynum as in Fig. 120 View FIGURES 120–125 ; with weakly sclerotized epigynal plate and finger-shaped semi-transparent process (‘knob’) arising at anterior margin on epigynal plate (not visible in Fig. 120 View FIGURES 120–125 ); whitish rugose area in front of epigynal plate bordered anteriorly by dark internal arc (‘valve’) visible through cuticle. Internal genitalia as in Fig. 121 View FIGURES 120–125 , with pair of oval pore plates.
Natural history. This species built its domed web connected to the underside of live leaves. Webs were sometimes shared with many cecidomyiid flies. At Labugama, the spiders were found in the forest as well as in very disturbed secondary vegetation.
Distribution. Known from four localities in southwestern Sri Lanka ( Fig. 225 View FIGURES 224–225 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |