Wanniyala ohiya, Huber, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4550.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F7D1EC4-D4ED-4FAE-B227-CF7B79EAE833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4581689 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA3B104C-FFBC-FFB0-FF3D-FDA1FB16E192 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Wanniyala ohiya |
status |
sp. nov. |
Wanniyala ohiya View in CoL sp. n.
Figures 138–140 View FIGURES 138–149 , 181–189 View FIGURES 181–186 View FIGURES 187–189 , 216 View FIGURES 213–219
Wanniyala SB063: Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data).
Wanniyala View in CoL SL61: Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data). Huber et al. 2018: fig. 7.
Diagnosis. Males are distinguished from congeners by details of palp (retrolateral sclerite of procursus with massive sickle-shaped dorsal process; distinctive processes of palpal trochanter, and slender weakly curved bulbal apophysis; Figs 183–186 View FIGURES 181–186 ). Females are easily distinguished by shape of epigynum (divided into anterior and posterior parts; Figs 187–188 View FIGURES 187–189 ) and by internal genitalia (distinctive shape of median structures; pore plates in very lateral position; Figs 189 View FIGURES 187–189 , 216 View FIGURES 213–219 ). Males and females also differ from most species (except W. agrabopath ) by absence of dark lateral bands on carapace ( Figs 138, 140 View FIGURES 138–149 ).
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the type locality (noun in apposition).
Type material. SRI LANKA: ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 20088), Uva Province, near Ohiya (6.807°N, 80.848°E), 2000 m a.s.l., 15.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined. SRI LANKA: 1♂ 1♀, NMSL , 4♂ 15♀ 1 juv., ZFMK ( Ar 20032, 20089), and 3♀ 1 juv. in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL146 About ZFMK ), same data as holotype GoogleMaps . 1♂ 3♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( Benj 45), and 1♂ in pure ethanol (not examined but photos of male palp kindly provided by S.P. Benjamin), NIFS (Pho-063), Uva Province, Badulla District, along Passara-Ella road (B113), Namunukula (6.867°N, 81.117°E), litter, 27.ii.2015 (S.P. Benjamin, N. Atukorala) GoogleMaps .
Description. Male (holotype). MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.4, carapace width 1.05. Distance PME- PME 125 µm, diameter PME 110 µm, distance PME-ALE 25 µm; AME absent. Sternum width/length: 0.74/0.64. Leg 1: 22.7 (5.5 + 0.4 + 5.6 + 9.0 + 2.2), tibia 2: 3.5, tibia 3: 2.6, tibia 4: 3.5; tibia 1 L/d: 66.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace pale ochre yellow with black median band including ocular area and clypeus; sternum mostly black, with ochre-yellow median mark; legs ochre-yellow, with dark rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen ochre-gray with dark marks dorsally and laterally, ventrally with anterior and posterior brown marks and three black marks in transversal row in-between.
BODY. Habitus as in Figs 138–139 View FIGURES 138–149 ; ocular area barely raised; carapace with shallow but distinct median furrow; clypeus with median process and pair of lateral processes, all rounded in frontal view, pointed in lateral view ( Figs 181–182 View FIGURES 181–186 ); sternum unmodified.
CHELICERAE. As in Figs 181–182 View FIGURES 181–186 , with pair of small apophyses proximally laterally and pair of long apophyses directed forwards, distance between tips of apophyses: 0.73.
PALPS. In general very similar to known congeners (cf. Figs 150–155 View FIGURES 150–155 ); coxa unmodified; trochanter with several distinctive processes ( Fig. 183 View FIGURES 181–186 ); femur with indistinct small dorsal apophysis proximally; tibia very long (1.14); procursus with several distinctive elements ( Figs 185–186 View FIGURES 181–186 ); bulb with simple membranous embolus and relatively long, weakly curved apophysis with rounded tip ( Fig. 184 View FIGURES 181–186 ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; with short vertical hairs in higher than usual density on all metatarsi; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 9%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~30 pseudosegments, fairly distinct.
Male (variation). Tibia 1 in five other males from type locality: 4.9–5.8 (mean 5.4). Males from Namunukula are smaller in all respects (e.g., tibia 1: 4.6; palpal tibia length 0.94) but have almost identical genitalia (only ‘prolateral sclerite 2’ of procursus distally without dorsal protrusion; arrow in Fig. 185 View FIGURES 181–186 ); in addition, sternum uniformly light brown and abdomen ventrally without dark marks.
Female. In general similar to male ( Fig. 140 View FIGURES 138–149 ) but clypeus unmodified and legs with usual low number of short vertical hairs. Tibia 1 in 15 females from type locality: 4.1–4.9 (mean 4.5). Epigynum as in Figs 187–188 View FIGURES 187–189 , weakly protruding in lateral view, anterior and posterior parts of epigynal plate divided by distinct furrow; width of epigynal plate (posterior part): 0.8; posterior plate apparently reduced(?) to two lateral sclerites partly hidden behind epigynal plate and poorly visible in ventral view; internal genitalia as in Figs 189 View FIGURES 187–189 , 216 View FIGURES 213–219 , with distinctive pair of median structures and pore plates in very lateral position. Females from Namunukula are slightly smaller in all respects (e.g., tibia 1: 3.5, 4.0, 4.1; epigynal plate width: 0.60–0.62) and differ (like males from Namunukula) by uniformly light brown sternum and absence of dark marks ventrally on abdomen.
Natural history. The spiders were found on overhanging rocks, always in a unique position, lying flat on their sides ( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 138–149 ). They were extremely well camouflaged and very reluctant to move when disturbed. Distribution. Known from two high-elevation localities in central Sri Lanka ( Fig. 227 View FIGURES 226–227 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.