Wanniyala viharekele, Huber, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4550.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F7D1EC4-D4ED-4FAE-B227-CF7B79EAE833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4581691 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA3B104C-FFBE-FFB6-FF3D-FB66FBAFE252 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Wanniyala viharekele |
status |
sp. nov. |
Wanniyala viharekele View in CoL sp. n.
Figures 141–143 View FIGURES 138–149 , 152–153 View FIGURES 150–155 , 190–196 View FIGURES 190–196 , 217 View FIGURES 213–219
Wanniyala View in CoL SL71: Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data). Huber et al. 2018: fig. 7.
Diagnosis. Males are distinguished from congeners by details of palp (retrolateral sclerite of procursus with sickleshaped dorsal process with obtuse tip and small ventral process; distinctive processes of palpal trochanter, and short curved bulbal apophysis; Figs 190–193 View FIGURES 190–196 ) and by modification of clypeus (pair of small pointed processes and small median process; similar only in W. labugama ). Females are distinguished from known congeners by shape of epigynum (strongly projecting but rounded in lateral view; Fig. 195 View FIGURES 190–196 ) and by details of internal genitalia (narrow anterior ‘valve’; prominent median membranous structure; shapes of fragmented pore plates; Figs 196 View FIGURES 190–196 , 217 View FIGURES 213–219 ).
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the type locality (noun in apposition).
Type material. SRI LANKA: ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 20090), Southern Province, Viharekele Forest (6.099°N, 80.594°E), 120 m a.s.l., 17.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined. SRI LANKA: 1♂ 1♀, NMSL , 7♂ 9♀ 4 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 20091–92), and 1♀ 1 juv. in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL155 About ZFMK ), same data as holotype GoogleMaps . 1♂ 1♀, ZFMK (Ar 20093), and 1♂ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL159 About ZFMK ), Southern Province, Kottawa Forest (6.097°N, 80.308°E), 60 m a.s.l., 17.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♀, RMNH, same locality, “under leaves”, 15.x.1982 (F. Wanless) GoogleMaps . 1♂ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Benj 38), Kombala- Kottawa Forest Reserve (6.098°N, 80.314°E), 60 m a.s.l., 19.v.2010 (S.P. Benjamin, S. Batuwita) GoogleMaps . 2♂, RMNH, Southern Province, Deniyaya [~ 6.34°N, 80.56°E], 400 m a.s.l., secondary forest margin, 25.viii.1981 (C.L. & P.R. Deeleman) GoogleMaps .
Description. Male (holotype). MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.7, carapace width 0.75. Distance PME- PME 110 µm, diameter PME 90 µm, distance PME-ALE 30 µm; AME absent. Sternum width/length: 0.52/0.36. Leg 1: 13.2 (3.2 + 0.3 + 3.3 + 4.9 + 1.5), tibia 2: 1.8, tibia 3: 1.4, tibia 4: 2.0; tibia 1 L/d: 60.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace ochre yellow with median and lateral dark bands; ocular area posteriorly dark; clypeus with pair of dark bands below eye triads; sternum black, without light mark; legs ochre-yellow, with dark rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen ochre-gray with dark marks dorsally and laterally, ventrally also with dark pattern.
BODY. Habitus as in Figs 141–142 View FIGURES 138–149 ; ocular area slightly raised; carapace with shallow but distinct median furrow; clypeus with pair of small pointed processes and small median process; sternum unmodified.
CHELICERAE. Similar to W. mudita (cf. Figs 156–157 View FIGURES 156–164 ), with pair of small apophyses proximally laterally and pair of long apophyses directed forwards, tips of apophyses distally directed downwards, distance between tips of apophyses: 0.61.
PALPS. As in Figs 152–153 View FIGURES 150–155 ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with several distinctive processes ( Fig. 190 View FIGURES 190–196 ); femur with small dorsal apophysis proximally; tibia very long (0.92); procursus with several distinctive elements ( Figs 192–193 View FIGURES 190–196 ); bulb with simple membranous embolus and short, weakly curved and pointed apophysis ( Fig. 191 View FIGURES 190–196 ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; with short vertical hairs in higher than usual density on all metatarsi (especially proximally); retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 13%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~20 pseudosegments, distally distinct.
Male (variation). Tibia 1 in 11 other males: 2.9–3.6 (mean 3.3). Sternum in some males medially lighter. Ventral process of retrolateral sclerite of procursus (arrow in Fig. 193 View FIGURES 190–196 ) slightly more slender in males from Kottawa.
Female. In general similar to male but clypeus unmodified and legs with usual low number of short vertical hairs. Tibia 1 in 12 females: 2.5–2.9 (mean: 2.7). Epigynum as in Figs 194–195 View FIGURES 190–196 , strongly protruding but evenly rounded in lateral view; posterior plate apparently reduced(?) to two lateral sclerites mostly hidden behind epigynal plate and poorly visible in ventral view; internal genitalia as in Figs 196 View FIGURES 190–196 , 217 View FIGURES 213–219 , with narrow anterior ‘valve’, prominent median membranous structure, and pore plates posteriorly fragmented into several smaller platelets.
Natural history. The spiders were found in the leaf litter.
Distribution. Known from three localities in southern Sri Lanka ( Fig. 227 View FIGURES 226–227 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.