Amemboa brevifasciata Miyamoto, 1967
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1210.125611 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6ED50927-CFF7-4795-8C05-DF78D85C848F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13327489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB065B7A-B0CA-5116-92D2-FB357057A52F |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Amemboa brevifasciata Miyamoto, 1967 |
status |
|
Amemboa brevifasciata Miyamoto, 1967 View in CoL
Figs 2 C View Figure 2 , 3 B View Figure 3 , 6 B View Figure 6 , 7 B View Figure 7 , 8 B View Figure 8 , 9 B View Figure 9 , 10 B View Figure 10 , 11 B View Figure 11 , 12 C View Figure 12 , 18 View Figure 18
Material examined.
1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ (apterous), China, Guangxi Province, Lai-bin City , Jin-xiu County; 24 ° 8 ' 40.2 " N, 110 ° 4 ' 49.1 " E; 565 m a. s. l.; 25 Jul. 2019; Zhen Ye leg. ( NKUM) GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂ (apterous), China, Guangxi Province, Fang-cheng-gang City, Shang-si County, Shi-wan-da-shan ; 21 ° 54 ' 4.0 " N, 107 ° 54 ' 22.0 " E; 300 m a. s. l.; 13 Jul. 2019; Zhen Ye leg. ( NKUM) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
Color pattern as shown in Figs 2 C View Figure 2 , 3 B View Figure 3 , 12 C View Figure 12 . Males: profemur moderately incrassate; ventral side of the profemur with two tufts of dark setae on apical 1 / 2 (Fig. 6 B View Figure 6 ); protibia slightly curved and with an indistinct tumescence on basal 1 / 3 (Fig. 6 B View Figure 6 ); abdominal segment VIII relatively short (Fig. 7 B View Figure 7 ); pygophore posteriorly with a digitate median process in ventral view, without other special modifications (Figs 8 B View Figure 8 , 9 B View Figure 9 ); median process of pygophore relatively broad in lateral view (Figs 10 B View Figure 10 , 11 B View Figure 11 ); lateral arm of proctiger moderately curve and slender in ventral view (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ), with a weakly developed subapical process in lateral view (Fig. 10 B View Figure 10 ).
Comparative notes.
A. brevifasciata Miyamoto, 1967 is most similar to A. fumi Esaki, 1925 , see comparative notes in Polhemus and Andersen (1984).
Distribution.
China: Hainan ( Zettel et al. 2007), Guangxi (Fig. 18 View Figure 18 ). Thailand; Vietnam; Peninsular Malaysia; Singapore; Indonesia: Sumatra ( Polhemus and Andersen 1984).
Remarks.
This species was previously recorded in Hainan ( Zettel et al. 2007), but we have not found it in this
distribution. New record for China
NKUM |
Nankai University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.