Polynoncus vazdemelloi Huchet & Costa-Silva, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4524.5.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B069290-C9B6-4289-AB91-DD11B9E3812C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5985374 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB0D9818-F467-6017-18FD-792F51568F88 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polynoncus vazdemelloi Huchet & Costa-Silva |
status |
sp. nov. |
Polynoncus vazdemelloi Huchet & Costa-Silva View in CoL , new species
( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1–3 , 11 View FIGURES 10–12 , 13 View FIGURE 13 )
Type specimens. HOLOTYPE (1♂ CEMT): BRAZIL: Pernambuco, Araçoiaba , CIMNC [= Campo de Instrução Marechal Newton Cavalcanti], 116m, V.2010, L. Iannuzzi leg. PARATYPES [15♂, 5♀ , and 44 unsexed]: BRAZIL: Pernambuco, Araçoiaba, CIMNC, 23. III.2010, Llannuzzi leg. (4♂ and 3 unsexed CJBH; 1♂, 2♀, and 13 unsexed CEMT; 1♂ and 1♀ ZUEC; 3 CJBH; 4 MNHN; 2♂ CVMD); Araçoiaba, CIMNC, 21.IV.2010, LIannuzzi leg. (8 CEMT; 1♂ and 1♀ MZSP; 1♂ and 1♀ CVMD); Araçoiaba, CIMNC, V.2010, LIannuzzi leg. (3 CEMT) ; Araçoiaba, CIMNC, 19.I.2010, R.S. Correa leg. (1 CEMT) ; Camaragibe, Aldeia , 01-30.V. 2016, 100m, - 7.977°S, - 35.006°W GoogleMaps , I.V.P.C. Grossi leg. (2♂, 1♀ and 1 unsexed CEMT; 6 unsexed CERPE); Camaragibe, Aldeia, 01- 31.VII. 2016, 100m, - 7.977°S, - 35.006°W, I.V.P.C. Grossi leg. (1 CEMT) GoogleMaps ; Camaragibe, Aldeia , 01-03.VII. 2016, 100m, - 7.977°S, - 35.006°W, I.V.P.C. Grossi leg. (3 CERPE) GoogleMaps ; Recife, Dois Irmãos, UFPE [= Universidade Federal de Pernambuco] (1♂ CEMT) ; Igarassu, RECD [= Refúgio Ecológico Charles Darwin], 10.VII.2007, Silva et al leg. (1♂ CEMT) . Alagoas: Ibateguara (Dois Braços) 3.XI.2007, B.K.C. Filgueiras col. (carcaça) (2♂ CEMT) ; Ibateguara (Varjão), 19.IX.2007, B.K.C. Filgueiras col. (carcaça) (1♂ CEMT) ; Ibateguara, Serra Grande , 900'01S, 3551'19W, 05.X.2011, pitfall, Mata Atlântica, Interior, B.K.C. Filgueiras leg. (1 CEMT) . Paraíba: João Pessoa, DSE/ UFPB [= Universidade Federal da Paraíba], A.A Endres leg. (1♂ CEMT) .
Description. Male. Length: 8.0–9.0 mm, width: 5.5–6.0 mm. Oblong, convex, dorsal surface of the head, pronotum, and elytra velutinous; color uniform, light brown, reminiscent of a walnut. Elytral outline distinctly convex, maximum width posterior of middle. Winged, macropterous. Male genitalia specifically distinct ( Figs. 2– 3 View FIGURES 1–3 ). Head: transverse, dorsal surface velutinous, the tegument finely microreticulate with sparse punctures, barely perceptible; anterior deflexed portion of clypeus triangular, sharp apically and emarginate in dorsal view; the anterior margin distinctly upturned; genae acutely pointed laterally. Front with 2 prominent, bulbous, median tubercles extending forward; flanked on both sides by 1 small additional, blunt tubercle, thus appearing quadrituberculate. Mentum subquadrangular, densely setose, surface roughly punctuate; gula convex, smooth and shiny. Eyes globose, weakly prominent from above. Antenna with dark-brown scape bearing long, orange setae; funicle inserted behind the apex; pedicel with 1 concentric row of long setae; flagellum glabrous, with the exception of a single seta located on the penultimate antennomere; club yellow with minute, golden tomentosity. Thorax: transverse, about 1.45 times as wide as long; pronotal surface sparsely but distinctly punctate; punctures small to medium, shallow. Anterior margin regularly convex, anterior angles obtusely rounded, distinctly projecting forward; base widely projecting backward in obtuse lobe; sides bulbous in front of middle, then slightly convergent in the basal half to a small protrusion located in front of the posterior angle (see Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–12 : Abp). Pronotal disc with 2 moderately elevated, median longitudinal ridges; extending over anterior 2/3 of pronotum; median depression shallow, distinctly constricted at middle. Median longitudinal bulge extending from the front edge to base, fused medially with the longitudinal ridges (this longitudinal bulge more-or-less marked according to the individual specimens). Median basal tubercles well differentiated, suboval, slightly laterally offset, narrowly spaced from apices of median ridges; anterior and lateral basal tubercles round apically merged together, faintly elevated. Scutellum elongate, almost twice as long as wide, sub-hastate apically. Prosternal apophysis a pointed subconical projection; metasternal depression large, distinctly concave. Elytra: suboval, almost 3 times as long as pronotum, sides convex; lateral outline smooth with sparse, short bristles; greatest width posterior to middle of elytra. Humeral callus bulbous, prominent. Odd-numbered costae with raised, oval, convex elongate tubercles, their surface with few sparse, microscopic, setiferous punctures with minute, golden bristles; each tubercle separated from each other by a distance about equal to their length. Sutural margin with widely spaced narrow tubercles; even-numbered costae with barely raised, small, round tubercles; intercostae with round, darkened punctures separated by a distance about equal to their diameter; dorsal profile visibly convex, strongly declivous apically, greatest convexity posterior of middle. Abdomen: 5 visible sternites (IV–VIII); sternite IV with rough surface; ventral surface velutinous with the exception of the median region. Legs: protibia very narrow, slightly bidentate at apex, apical portion imperceptibly dilated; outer margin with a minute anteromedian tooth, inner margin slightly arched inward; apical spur pointed forward, slightly sinuate apically, length equal to the first 4 tarsomeres combined; mesotibia slightly arched, the outer margin with a postmedian tooth; metatibia roughly straight; both mesotibia and metatibia slightly indented apically; mesotarsi and metatarsi with sparse, short, pale setae both dorsally and ventrally. Male genitalia ( Figs. 2–3 View FIGURES 1–3 ): aedeagus symmetrical; parameres rather simple, thin, poorly sclerotized apically. Median lobe symmetrical, narrow, expanded apically, the apophysis barely dilated at apex.
Habitat and natural history. According to the localities mentioned on the labels, this new species seems to be restricted to the Atlantic Forest and Restinga, a distinct type of coastal tropical moist broadleaf forest with sandy soil. Like other members of the genus, this species can be easily collected using decaying organic matters (carcass, liver, gizzard, or feces) as bait in all seasons.
Distribution. This new species is known from littoral areas of Northeast Brazil (Nordeste): Paraíba, Pernambuco, and Alagoas ( Fig 13 View FIGURE 13 ).
Etymology. This species is dedicated to our colleague Fernando Zagury Vaz-de-Mello of Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), a Brazilian specialist of Scarabaeoidea.
Differential diagnosis. Externally, P. vazdemelloi is most similar to P. juglans ( Ratcliffe, 1978) ( Figs. 4–6 View FIGURES 4–6 ) and P. gemmingeri ( Harold, 1872) ( Figs. 7–9 View FIGURES 7–9 ). It can be reliably distinguished from both species by the lateral outline of the pronotum and the shape of the antero-basal projection (Abp), being very reduced ( Figs. 10–12 View FIGURES 10–12 ). Moreover, the general outline of the elytra is convex (subparallel in P. juglans and P. gemmingeri ), and the elytral tubercles distinctly less raised (the latter rounded rather than oval in P. gemmingeri ). Protibia very narrow, barely indented apically in P. vazdemelloi (enlarged apically in P. juglans , dilated and strongly bidentate in P. gemmingeri ). Mesotarsomeres and metatarsomeres distinctly longer than wide (length/width = 1.4) in P. gemmingeri , the claws well developed, mesotarsomeres and metatarsomeres subquadrangular (length/width = 1.1), the claws visibly reduced in P. vazdemellloi and P. juglans . The male genitalia of the three species are very distinctive: in P. juglans , the apophysis of the median lobe is spatulate apically ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4–6 ), asymmetrical within P. gemmingeri ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–9 ), the apophysis simply extended and barely dilated at apex in P. vazdemelloi ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–3 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |